Free and Premium Cisco 300-740 Dumps Questions Answers

The SCAZT documentation emphasizes that when Cisco Secure XDR identifies a high-risk threat (e.g., risk score 8 out of 10 for malware distribution, as shown in the exhibit), the first priority is to prevent lateral movement and data exfiltration. The recommended first response action is to isolate the affected endpoint from the network.

Cisco Secure Endpoint and XDR allow you to trigger an "isolate" response directly from the dashboard, cutting off all non-management communication from the compromised device. This preserves the environment and enables forensic analysis before removing malware or taking destructive actions like rebuilding the system.

In IKEv1 policy configuration for Cisco ASA, two key commands are required to define the encryption and hashing algorithms:

A: encryption aes-256 defines the encryption method for the IKE SA.

E: hash sha-256 ensures SHA-256 is used as the integrity mechanism during IKE phase 1.

According to Cisco documentation and SCAZT (Section 1: Cloud Security Architecture, Pages 19–22), these two components are essential to negotiating a secure VPN tunnel. The provided config uses group 1 (modp768), which is weak by today’s standards and could also lead to negotiation failure. However, from the available options, encryption and hash are the two required for tunnel success.

A drive-by compromise occurs when malicious code is automatically downloaded and executed simply by visiting a compromised website—often through malicious advertising scripts (malvertising). According to SCAZT Section 4: Application and Data Security (Pages 85–87), ad blockers help prevent drive-by downloads by blocking these third-party ad scripts and redirections, which are commonly used in such attacks.

VPNs and private browsing modes (e.g., Incognito) do not provide protection against malicious content hosted on web pages.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a globally recognized knowledge base that catalogs adversary behavior. One of its most crucial components is its matrix of Tactics and Techniques.

“Techniques for accessing credentials” is a key example of the Techniques layer within the MITRE ATT&CK matrix.

These techniques describe how adversaries achieve tactical objectives—such as gaining access to credentials for lateral movement or privilege escalation.

In the SCAZT guide under Threat Response, organizations are advised to map telemetry and detection tools (like Cisco Secure Analytics, SecureX, and Secure Endpoint) to the MITRE ATT&CK framework to enhance visibility and accelerate threat response.

The Secure Cloud Analytics alert indicates suspicious heartbeat-based connections from an internal server (ip-10-201-0-16) to multiple suspicious IPs over UDP/port 53 (DNS). This behavior suggests command-and-control (C2) activity or botnet communications.

B: Alerting the incident response (IR) team is a critical next step in escalating a verified threat as per SCAZT Section 6 (Threat Response, Pages 114–117).

D: Blocking the identified malicious IPs on perimeter firewalls or network access control devices is an appropriate containment step to disrupt communication.

Reinstallation (A/E) is premature without a full forensic investigation. Validating IDS logs (C) is useful but not immediate response-focused compared to actions B and D.

According to the SCAZT documentation, web application firewalls (WAFs) designed to protect against zero-day Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks leverage adaptive and behavioral-based algorithms. These algorithms dynamically analyze traffic patterns, baseline normal behavior, and detect anomalies that could indicate novel or zero-day attacks. Unlike signature-based detection, adaptive and behavioral methods adjust in real-time to emerging threats, learning from ongoing traffic without relying on pre-defined rules. This proactive approach enables rapid detection and mitigation of unknown DDoS vectors, critical for cloud and network security where threats evolve constantly.

From the firewall access rules provided, Rule 1 allows traffic from 20.1.1.10 (GCP VM) to 20.1.1.1 using HTTPS. However, this destination is not the actual mail server—the mail server resides at 192.168.200.10 (inside network). Therefore:

A: Rule 1 must be updated to reflect the correct destination: 192.168.200.10. Without this change, traffic is not permitted to the mail server.

D: NAT (Network Address Translation) is needed to translate the external address (e.g., 20.1.1.10) to access internal addresses (like 192.168.200.10). As per SCAZT and Cisco firewall policies, NAT enables proper packet delivery from public to private zones.

Rule 2, which denies all other traffic, is correctly placed after the specific allow rule. Therefore, moving it (Option B) would not help, and Options C and E are unrelated to resolving the immediate firewall access and routing issue.

After Cloudlock is integrated with Salesforce, full visibility into objects and data requires that Cloudlock has the “View All Data” permission enabled on the connected Salesforce account. This permission allows the Cloudlock API connection to access all user data, regardless of individual field-level or sharing rules. Without it, Cloudlock will be limited in its visibility scope.

As per SCAZT (Section 4: Application and Data Security, Pages 86–89), integration with SaaS platforms like Salesforce must include enabling comprehensive data visibility to perform effective risk analysis and policy enforcement.

Rule 3 allows all traffic (including SSH) from 10.1.0.0/30 during the hours of 18:00–08:00, which directly conflicts with Rule 1 that is intended to deny SSH at those same hours. Since firewall rules are evaluated top-down and Rule 3 allows traffic during the exact period where SSH should be blocked, deleting Rule 3 will allow Rule 1 to apply correctly.

This behavior is explained in SCAZT Section 3 (Network and Cloud Security, Pages 72–75), where rule precedence and time-based evaluation logic are discussed.

According to the SCAZT guide, the “Always-on” deployment mode for Cisco Secure DDoS (including integration with Secure Web Application Firewall solutions) provides continuous protection for both volumetric and application-layer attacks. This deployment model ensures that all traffic flows through the scrubbing and WAF infrastructure without requiring traffic redirection only during attack events. It provides real-time mitigation and immediate detection, which is essential to address both volumetric attacks (e.g., SYN floods) and Layer 7 (application-layer) attacks such as HTTP floods and injection-based threats.

While “Hybrid” and “On-demand” modes are useful for specific use cases, only “Always-on” offers continuous and comprehensive protection required for environments that demand consistent uptime and threat prevention.

Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) use rate-based rules as one of the primary mechanisms to detect and mitigate Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks. According to the SCAZT Study Guide, Section 3 (Network and Cloud Security, Pages 74–77), rate-based rules dynamically detect unusual spikes in traffic and can throttle or block connections exceeding predefined thresholds. This form of protection is more adaptive and intelligent than standard ACLs or static filtering, enabling protection against zero-day and volumetric attacks that may not follow known patterns.

The Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) uses TCP port 3389. Cisco Umbrella includes a cloud-delivered firewall that can be used to block outbound traffic by port. In this case, since the RDP communication needs to be prevented regardless of application name resolution, the best approach is to use a Firewall policy in Umbrella to block port 3389 traffic across the tunnel.

The screenshot from Cisco Secure Cloud Analytics shows a Role Violation alert. According to the “Supporting Observations” pane, the device with IP 10.201.0.15 is assigned the role of Domain Controller but has demonstrated traffic behavior matching an FTP client, connecting to ports 20, 21, 115, 152, 989, and 990. This discrepancy triggered the alert.

Cisco SCAZT documentation emphasizes that devices acting outside their expected network roles (e.g., a domain controller acting as an FTP client) indicate potential compromise or misuse. Role-based anomaly detection is part of Visibility and Assurance mechanisms where baseline behaviors are continuously monitored and flagged when changes occur outside expected policy or operational norms.

When integrating Duo Authentication Proxy with Active Directory for multifactor authentication (MFA), you must:

Configure the Identity Source in the Duo Admin Panel as Active Directory (not SAML), since it’s using the Authentication Proxy.

Configure the authentication proxy settings in the [sso] section to communicate with both AD and the Duo cloud.

This setup allows Active Directory to be the primary identity store while Duo provides the second authentication factor.

A screenshot of a phone number AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Automation of containment and response actions—such as isolating compromised endpoints and applying predefined security policies—is a critical capability of Cisco’s XDR and SecureX platform. According to SCAZT Section 6: Threat Response (Pages 112–117), automating threat containment allows security teams to rapidly limit the blast radius of incidents and improve mean time to respond (MTTR), without relying solely on manual intervention.

The policy includes three rules under the Apps scope. Rule #1 allows HR to communicate with IT on TCP port 23 (Telnet), but it is marked as “Default.” Rule #2 denies the same HR-to-IT Telnet traffic and is marked as “Absolute,” which takes precedence over any default rule. In Cisco Secure Workload (Tetration), an “Absolute” rule will override both “Default” and inherited rules. Therefore, even though there’s an allow in Rule #1, the deny in Rule #2 prevents HR from using Telnet to connect to IT.