Cisco 400-007 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

When a service provider does not support multicast over their Layer 3 VPN, the enterprise can useGRE tunnels between Customer Edge (CE) devicesto transport multicast traffic. This method allows the customer to encapsulate multicast packets in unicast GRE packets, which are routable through the provider’s non-multicast core.

In this scenario, the most scalable and immediate solution is to establish a GRE tunnel betweenC2 (in the head office CE router path)andC4 (at the branch office). This setup ensures that multicast traffic originating at the head office is tunneled directly to the multicast receivers, bypassing the service provider’s non-multicast-aware core.

This strategy is directly aligned with CCDE v3.1 principles, which emphasize:

Minimizing service provider dependency

Providing a scalable, customer-controlled overlay solution

Ensuring protocol compatibility across domains

Why other options are incorrect:

A: Tunnel between CE1 and CE2 is less optimal, as it may not originate or terminate at the exact multicast endpoints.

C: Tunnel between C1 and C4 is less aligned with CE-to-CE design expectations and may bypass required edge security/policy controls.

D: 2547oDMVPN is more complex and intended for full-scale VPN overlays, not quick multicast solutions.

E: Draft Rosen requires service provider support, which is currently unavailable, hence not a valid short-term option.

This solution ensures operational simplicity and future scalability with minimal provider dependency, which are core principles outlined in the CCDE v3.1 design methodology.

A: FabricPath assigns a specific multicast (S,G) flow to one tree. A single (S,G) does not get load-balanced across multiple trees.

E: Overall multicast traffic across multiple (S,G) groups is distributed across multiple FabricPath trees, providing general load balancing and efficient link utilization across the fabric.

Why other options are incorrect:

B: Traffic load per tree may not be uniform due to different group distributions.

C: The assignment is done by the ingress switch based on hashing, not all leaf nodes assign the same tree.

D: Individual (S,G) flows do not get load-balanced across trees.

—

C (Class-Based Weighted Fair Queuing - CBWFQ): CBWFQ allows assigning bandwidth limits (in this case, 2 Mbps) to specific traffic classes, effectively controlling scavenger traffic without dropping excess packets unnecessarily.

Other options explained:

A: Policing drops excess traffic immediately rather than queuing.

B: LLQ is for delay-sensitive traffic, not scavenger control.

D: Shaping is useful but typically applied at interface level, not specific traffic classes.