Blue Prism AD01 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

This must be an environment issue. The Blue Prism environment must be consistent and persistent, and an element that worked one day and does not work the next day suggests the environment is changeable. The IT team supporting the environment needs to be contacted to fix the problem.

The Blue Prism product support team should be contacted to report the issue. This signifies an inconsistency in how the Blue Prism product is working which needs to be fixed.

This suggests that Best Practice exception handling has not been implemented in the object. A retry loop around the object stages that are using the element will probably fix the problem

It is common for consistency issues to be found during configuration/development testing. The most likely cause is that an attribute has been selected for the element that is changeable, such as a window title with a date, or a URL The developer needs to ensure that any changeable attributes are unticked.

The flow shown in the diagram is correct, the wart stages are all adding a high level of robustness to the action

The wait stages after read and write stages should be removed they are not required and are lowing the flow down

The wait stages after read stages should be removed, the wart stages after write stages should be left because the application will have been changed

Only the first wait stage in this flow is required, all the other wait stages should be removed.

Sub-pages should not have retry logic, exception handling should be in the object level rather than in the process.

The resume stage must also be within the exception block

The retry loop logic does not include any navigation after the resume stage to ensure the application is ready to try the 'Search Screen -Perform Search' action again.

The retry loop logic shown in the image is incorrect because it uses multiple action stages. There should be a retry loop around every action.