IIA IIA-CIA-Part3 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

To enable management to receive timely feedback and mitigate unforeseen risks, it is critical to have a performance measurement system in place. Measuring product performance against an established standard is a key control mechanism that allows management to identify deviations, take corrective actions, and mitigate risks proactively.

Performance Monitoring & Timely Feedback: Comparing actual product performance against set standards helps in detecting quality issues, inefficiencies, or process failures early.

Risk Mitigation: Ensures that any deviations from expected performance can be addressed before they become major problems.

Internal Control Best Practices: Measuring against standards aligns with IIA’s risk management principles to ensure continuous monitoring and improvement.

Option B (Develop standard methods for performing established activities): While standardization improves efficiency, it does not provide ongoing feedback or mitigate unforeseen risks in real-time.

Option C (Require the grouping of activities under a single manager): Centralizing activities may improve coordination, but it does not directly provide timely performance feedback.

Option D (Assign each employee a reasonable workload): Managing workloads ensures efficiency but does not provide risk mitigation through performance monitoring.

IIA’s Standard 2120 – Risk Management: Requires internal auditors to assess whether an organization’s risk management processes enable timely risk identification and mitigation.

COSO’s Internal Control Framework (Performance Monitoring Component): Emphasizes measuring actual performance against expected outcomes as a fundamental internal control.

Why Option A is Correct:Why Other Options Are Incorrect:IIA References:Thus, the most appropriate answer is A. Measure product performance against an established standard.

Understanding Data Recovery and Security Risks:

Data must be protected, recoverable, and accessible when needed while maintaining security.

The best practice is to store encrypted backups offsite while keeping encryption keys separate but accessible.

Why Option D is Correct?

Storing encrypted data offsite (a few hours away) ensures protection against disasters (e.g., fire, cyberattacks, physical damage).

Keeping encryption keys at the organization ensures that recovery is quick and controlled without risking unauthorized access.

This aligns with the IIA's IT Audit Practices and ISO 27001 (Information Security Management), which emphasize separate storage of encrypted data and encryption keys for security and recoverability.

IIA Standard 2110 – Governance requires internal auditors to assess whether IT governance ensures the availability and security of critical data.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect?

Option A (Encrypted physical copies and keys stored together at the organization):

If both data and keys are in the same location, a disaster or breach would make recovery impossible.

Option B (Encrypted copies and keys stored in separate locations far away):

While secure, if encryption keys are stored too far, recovery could be delayed, impacting business continuity.

Option C (Encrypted usage reports in a cloud database):

This does not ensure full data recovery; it only provides logs and structure changes, not the actual data.

Storing encrypted data offsite while keeping encryption keys accessible onsite follows best IT security and disaster recovery practices.

IIA Standard 2110 supports evaluating IT governance, including data security and recovery controls.

Final Justification:IIA References:

IPPF Standard 2110 – Governance

ISO 27001 – Information Security Management

NIST SP 800-34 – Contingency Planning Guide for IT Systems

COBIT Framework – Data Security & Recovery Controls