SnowPro Advanced Certification DAA-C01 Full Course Free

When working within the Snowsight interface, the transition from a standalone worksheet to a dashboard component involves a change in how the underlying SQL and its associated metadata are managed. When a worksheet is converted or used to create a dashboard, the ownership and sharing model shifts to the dashboard level.

According to Snowflake's documentation on Snowsight collaboration, when a user creates a dashboard from a worksheet that was previously shared with others, the original worksheet's individual share settings are essentially superseded by the dashboard's own permissions. In many workflow scenarios within the UI, once the worksheet is finalized into a dashboard tile, the direct, independent access to that specific worksheet is severed for the original "sharees." Their permissions on that specific worksheet are revoked to prevent conflicting edits between the standalone version and the dashboard-integrated version.

Evaluating the Options:

Option A is incorrect because Snowsight manages the lifecycle of worksheets used in dashboards as part of the dashboard object; independent sharing of the underlying worksheet is typically disabled or revoked.

Option B and C are distractors; there is no mechanism in Snowsight that grants "additional" access or "temporary" loss during the creation process.

Option D is the 100% correct answer based on the SnowPro Data Analyst standard regarding Snowsight object ownership and sharing lifecycle. To allow others to see the work, the Analyst must now share the Dashboard itself, rather than relying on the previous worksheet-level permissions. This ensures a "single source of truth" for the visualization's logic.

In Snowflake, "spilling" occurs when the intermediate data required to process a query exceeds the available memory (RAM) of the virtual warehouse. When this happens, Snowflake "spills" the data first to the warehouse's local SSD and, if that fills up, to remote storage (e.g., S3 or Azure Blob). This significantly degrades performance due to increased I/O latency.

To resolve this without increasing costs (i.e., without scaling up to a larger warehouse size), an analyst must reduce the memory footprint of the query.

CTEs vs. Temporary Tables: While Common Table Expressions (CTEs) are excellent for readability, they are often treated as logical entities that the optimizer may re-evaluate multiple times or struggle to keep in memory during massive joins.

Batch Processing: By splitting a single monolithic query into multiple steps and storing intermediate results in temporary tables, the analyst forces the engine to clear its memory between steps. This process acts as a "checkpoint," effectively processing the data in smaller, more manageable batches that fit within the current warehouse's memory limits.

Evaluating the Options:

Option A is incorrect because spilling is a compute-resource issue, not a storage-lock or contention issue.

Option B is incorrect because materialized views and clustering incur background credit costs for maintenance, violating the "without increasing costs" constraint.

Option C is incorrect because external tables are generally slower than native Snowflake tables due to the lack of proprietary metadata and micro-partitioning.

Manually defining table structures for complex semi-structured files like Parquet can be error-prone and time-consuming. Snowflake provides a specific automation workflow to handle this, involving the detection of the file's internal schema and the dynamic creation of a matching table.

The process starts with the INFER_SCHEMA function. Because Parquet files are self-describing, they contain metadata about their columns and data types. INFER_SCHEMA reads this metadata from files in a stage and returns a list of column names and types. To turn this list into an actual table, the analyst uses the CREATE TABLE ... USING TEMPLATE syntax. This command takes the output of INFER_SCHEMA as an input and automatically builds a table with the corresponding definition.

Evaluating the Options:

Option A is incorrect because CREATE TABLE LIKE is used to copy the structure of an existing table, not to build a new one from file metadata.

Option C and D are incorrect because GENERATE_COLUMN_DESCRIPTION is a helper function used to create a formatted string of column definitions, but it is not the primary command used with USING TEMPLATE for automated table creation.

Option B is the Correct answer. The combination of INFER_SCHEMA (to find the columns) and USING TEMPLATE (to build the table) is the standard Snowflake pattern for schema-on-read automation in Data Ingestion workflows.

To predict future values based on historical data, an analyst must determine the mathematical relationship between two variables—typically time (independent variable) and revenue (dependent variable). This is the foundation of linear regression.

The REGR_SLOPE function is a linear regression function that calculates the slope of the "least squares" regression line for non-null pairs in a group. In the context of sales forecasting, the "slope" represents the rate of change in revenue over time. By calculating the slope, an analyst can project that trend forward to estimate what the revenue will be at a future date (the end of the year).

Evaluating the Options:

Option A (CORR) measures the correlation coefficient, which tells you how strongly two variables are related (between -1 and 1), but it does not provide a mathematical formula to predict a specific future value.

Option C (COVAR_SAMP) calculates the sample covariance, which indicates the direction of a linear relationship but not the magnitude or slope required for prediction.

Option D (VARIANCE) is a descriptive statistic that measures data spread (how far numbers are from the mean) and is not used for trend projection or prediction.

Option B is the 100% correct answer. Along with REGR_INTERCEPT, REGR_SLOPE allows the analyst to build the linear equation $y = mx + b$ to perform predictive analytics.