The engineer is working on a workflow implementation.
After a form step, the workflow can transition to three steps:
Stop if the Reject (back) button is used,
Audit if the Approve (next) button is used and the field named comment is returned from the form to the workflow variable comment and has a value,
Provision otherwise.
The engineer writes the transitions in XML code.
Is this a valid implementation?
Proposed Solution:
< Transition to= " Stop " when= " !ref:approved " / >
< Transition to= " Audit " when= " script:sailpoint.tools.Util.isNotNullOrEmpty(comment); " / >
< Transition to= " Provision " / >
An engineer is assigned to configure an account attribute. The requirements are:
Purpose: Flag privileged accounts
Read from: Financial application, privileged attribute
Calculate from: Keystore application, responsibility-code attribute
Usage 1: Display as option in Advanced Analytics
Usage 2: Use when writing rules
Usage 3: Include in policies
Does the engineer need to set this configuration option on the account attribute to meet the requirements?
Proposed Solution:
Attribute Name
Is this a benefit of using the Run Rule feature of the Debug-Object page?
Solution: It can be used to create/modify/delete SailPoint database objects.
Is the following statement about IdentityIQ rule inputs and outputs correct?
Proposed Solution:
The default description of a Rule, which originates from the Rule Registry, usually provides information about the Rule ' s purpose and its expected output.