Pass Using PF1 Exam Dumps

In Quebec, employer-paid premiums (contributions) to a group insurance plan, including a private health services plan (which commonly covers items like dental and prescription drugs), are treated as a taxable benefit for the employee for Quebec purposes. Revenu Québec explicitly states that contributions (premiums) an employer pays under a group insurance plan for coverage received by an employee constitute a taxable benefit.

Because the employer is paying the premium directly to the insurer (the employee receives coverage rather than cash), this is treated as a non-cash taxable benefit in payroll classification terms. The payroll impact is that this taxable benefit must be included in the employee’s Quebec taxable income and reported on the RL-1 (and handled according to Quebec source deduction rules).

Outside Quebec, employer-paid health/dental plan premiums are generally not treated the same way for provincial taxable benefit purposes, which is why the correct answer among the options is Quebec.

Even though the question uses the word “reimbursed,” the key fact isno receipts. In CRA terms, when an employee is paid a set amount or is not required to substantiate the expense, the payment functions like anallowance, not an accountable reimbursement. CRA’s guidance on uniforms/special or protective clothing states these amounts aregenerally taxable, and only in specific circumstances under CRA administrative policy would they be non-taxable.

CRA interpretations also reinforce that where employeesdo not have to provide receipts, a clothing allowance is generally ataxable employment benefit; non-taxable treatment is linked to substantiation and meeting strict conditions (for example, safety footwear with receipts).

So, because Helen’s payment isnot supported by receipts, it is best classified as ataxable allowance(option A). Payroll should include the amount in taxable income, apply required withholdings as applicable, and ensure policy/records support whatever treatment is used.

A retiring allowance is treated as a lump-sum payment for payroll withholding purposes. When part of a retiring allowance is transferred directly to an RRSP/RPP, CRA guidance indicates you do not withhold income tax on the transferred amount (up to the employee’s available limit), because it is not paid to the employee in cash.

Step 1: Determine the portion paid directly to the employee (non-eligible portion):

$25,000 − $15,000 transferred to RRSP = $10,000 paid/remaining.

Step 2: Apply CRA lump-sum withholding rates (outside Quebec):

For total lump-sum payments $5,001 to $15,000, the withholding rate is 20%.

Step 3: Calculate tax to withhold on $10,000:

$10,000 × 20% = $2,000.00.

So the correct option is B ($2,000.00).

Anne has both an automobile standby charge (because the car was made available) and an operating expense benefit (because the employer paid operating costs and she did not reimburse).

1) Standby charge (leased auto): Lease cost for standby charge purposes includes GST and excludes insurance.

Monthly lease incl. GST = $198.60 × 1.05 = $208.53.

Standby charge per month = 2/3 × $208.53 = $139.02.

Days available ÷ 30 = 365 ÷ 30 = 12.17, rounded to 12.

Annual standby charge = $139.02 × 12 = $1,668.24.

2) Operating expense benefit: Personal km = 34,134 − 15,805 = 18,329.

Optional method requires the automobile be used primarily (>50%) for business; Anne’s business use is under 50%, so the optional method does not apply and the fixed rate must be used.

Fixed rate (2026) = $0.34/km → 18,329 × 0.34 = $6,231.86.

Total taxable benefit = $1,668.24 + $6,231.86 = $7,900.10.