PF1 Exam Dumps : Payroll Fundamentals 1Exam

In Quebec, employees must complete a Quebec-specific source deductions form so the employer can calculate Québec income tax to withhold. Revenu Québec identifies Form TP-1015.3-V (Source Deductions Return) as the form employees complete and provide to their employer/payer for this purpose. It is part of the onboarding/payroll setup process in Quebec and is used to determine personal tax credits and any additional withholding instructions for Québec provincial income tax.

The other options are not the standard Quebec source deductions return for new employees: T1213 is a CRA form used to request a reduction in tax deductions at source (federal), TD1-AB is a provincial TD1 for Alberta (not Quebec), and T2222 is not the Quebec source deductions return. From a payroll communication standpoint, the employer should request both the applicable federal TD1 and the Quebec TP-1015.3-V, then retain them on file to support accurate withholding calculations.

Even though the question uses the word “reimbursed,” the key fact isno receipts. In CRA terms, when an employee is paid a set amount or is not required to substantiate the expense, the payment functions like anallowance, not an accountable reimbursement. CRA’s guidance on uniforms/special or protective clothing states these amounts aregenerally taxable, and only in specific circumstances under CRA administrative policy would they be non-taxable.

CRA interpretations also reinforce that where employeesdo not have to provide receipts, a clothing allowance is generally ataxable employment benefit; non-taxable treatment is linked to substantiation and meeting strict conditions (for example, safety footwear with receipts).

So, because Helen’s payment isnot supported by receipts, it is best classified as ataxable allowance(option A). Payroll should include the amount in taxable income, apply required withholdings as applicable, and ensure policy/records support whatever treatment is used.

An ROE is required when an employee experiences an interruption of earnings, such as 7 consecutive calendar days with no work and no insurable earnings (the “7-day rule”), or when earnings fall below 60% of regular weekly earnings for specific reasons (the “60% rule”). That means a 6-week unpaid leave (A) typically triggers an interruption of earnings, and a drop to 40% of normal earnings (B) meets the “below 60%” threshold (when due to the listed leave reasons). A layoff with no recall (D) also triggers an interruption of earnings under the 7-day rule.

However, Service Canada lists a special situation for a change in ownership: the former employer does not have to issue ROEs if (1) there is no actual break in the employee receiving earnings, and (2) payroll records are available to the new owner and the new owner agrees to issue a single ROE covering both periods if needed. That is exactly option C, so no ROE is required in that scenario.