Online 300-615 Questions Video

Cisco troubleshooting logic supports EVPN Type 1-5 as the required fix. In this question the symptoms point to EVPN, and the defect is best handled by correcting the exact control-plane or consistency condition. Nexus platforms can show interfaces or peers as configured while still refusing to forward traffic if a vPC Type-1 parameter, VLAN allowance, MTU, HSRP version, EVPN route, or routing attribute is wrong. Cisco methodology is to avoid broad resets unless the state machine is stuck; instead, correct the mismatched parameter and verify that the resulting operational state becomes stable. The other choices do not remove the root cause, or they modify a setting that is not used by the failing protocol exchange. After the change, the engineer should review the peer status, route or MAC table, and counters for drops or inconsistency messages. That sequence proves that the network fabric is fixed, not merely restarted.

The answer is Correct the configuration of the vPC peer link and the vPC peer keepalive; Match the vPC domain ID between the two devices because Cisco Nexus and ACI forwarding depends on exact agreement between the devices participating in the feature. The scenario references vPC; those technologies fail in predictable ways when required parameters do not match or when the required control-plane advertisement is absent. In DCIT troubleshooting, the engineer should identify the failed dependency, correct that dependency, and then verify the operational table that proves the fix. For example, vPC and EVPN checks focus on consistency, VNI/VRF bindings, peer-gateway behavior, and host-route advertisement; routing checks focus on neighbor state, MTU, timers, authentication, next-hop, and route preference. The selected answer addresses the dependency that blocks forwarding. The distractors are plausible because they touch related features, but they do not resolve the specific failure condition. Post-change validation should include protocol state, learned endpoint or route entries, and a traffic test across the affected path.

The selected option, action 1.0 cli local python Config.py, is correct for the automation path described. Cisco NX-OS requires precision in EEM applets, scheduler jobs, Guest Shell operations, and REST/NX-API syntax. The affected element is EEM; therefore, the fix must be applied to the component that actually executes the action. For EEM, that means a valid event detector and explicit actions, with event-default when the matched CLI command should continue. For Guest Shell and Bash, DNS, proxy, resource allocation, and reboot behavior are local to the Linux container. For REST calls, the class name, method, authentication, and XML/JSON structure must match the APIC or NX-OS object model. The distractors usually change the switch globally or alter an unrelated command. Cisco DCIT automation troubleshooting confirms the fix by checking the returned error, then rerunning the exact job, script, or API operation in the same context.

The selected resolution is VSAN 1 is suspended because the failure is in the Fibre Channel/FCoE control path around MDS, VSAN, Cisco Nexus. Cisco MDS and Nexus platforms separate configuration from operational state: a VSAN, zone, vFC binding, device alias, or port-security entry can exist in configuration but still fail if it is not active, correctly merged, or allowed on the link. The correct option addresses the fabric condition that prevents communication. The incorrect options are technically adjacent but would not repair the specific dependency; for example, changing unrelated databases or resetting ports without correcting policy leaves the same failure to recur. Cisco SAN troubleshooting therefore starts with port role and VSAN checks, then confirms fabric services such as fcdomain, FSPF, zoning, fabric binding, and name-server information. The expected validation is that the port becomes operational, the initiator and target appear in the appropriate databases, and permitted zone members can communicate.