Weekend Sale 70% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: save70

Last Attempt ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Questions

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam Questions and Answers

Question 33

How frequently should surveillance audits be conducted?

Options:

A.

At least once a calendar year, except in recertification years

B.

Every two years

C.

Every three years

Question 34

Question:

Which of the following competencies must at least one of the audit team members possess?

Options:

A.

Teamwork and communication skills

B.

Knowledge of the risk-based approach to auditing

C.

Knowledge of the auditee's language

Question 35

Which statement regarding the confidentiality of documented information related to or collected from the auditee is NOT accurate?

Options:

A.

The certification body notifies the auditee before disclosing information, considering all types of information as confidential unless already public

B.

Confidential information related to the auditee's AIMS can be disclosed without prior notice if legally required or contractually authorized

C.

Information from external sources, like regulators or complaints, is automatically public and can be disclosed without restriction

D.

Auditors and certification bodies must protect the confidentiality of auditee information unless legal or contractual disclosure is required

Question 36

Did the audit team leader thoroughly review all essential components before deciding to close the nonconformity? Refer to scenario 9.

Scenario 9: ImoAl, headquartered in California. USA, provides Al solutions for various industries such as finance, healthcare, retail, and manufacturing. Its clients

include major financial institutions seeking Al powered fraud detection systems, healthcare providers leveraging Al for diagnostics and patient care, retailers

optimizing supply chain management with Al forecasting, and manufacturers enhancing production efficiency through Al-driven automation.

ImoAl has recently undergone a certification audit to ensure that its artificial intelligence management system AIMS is in compliance with ISO/IEC 42001. During the

audit, a major nonconformity related to data security protocols was identified, requiring urgent resolution. ImoAl swiftly initiated corrective actions to address the

major nonconformity. The audit follow-up, in agreement with the auditee, was scheduled six weeks after the initial audit. As part of exploring alternatives to audit

follow-up, the audit team leader chose to verify the effectiveness of the actions taken by the auditee by scheduling a specific visit to ImoAI's premises.

The follow-up audit involved a thorough evaluation of the effectiveness of these actions. The audit team leader thoroughly examined the corrections, corrective actions,

and root cause analysis conducted by ImoAl to assess whether they adequately addressed the nonconformity identified during the initial audit.

In conjunction with the external audit follow-up, ImoAl engaged its internal auditing team to oversee the progress of corrective actions. The AIMS manager of ImoAl

updated Ms. Rebecca Hayes, the internal auditor, on the status of corrections and corrective actions prompted by the nonconformity identified during the external

audit. Subsequently, Ms. Hayes thoroughly reviewed these measures, analyzing the corrections, root causes, and effectiveness of the implemented actions.

Upon satisfactory validation of the action plans, ImoAl was recommended for certification.

Options:

A.

Yes, the audit team leader reviewed all the necessary elements

B.

No, the audit team leader overlooked potential impacts on related processes

C.

No, the audit team leader focused solely on immediate corrective actions without considering long-term prevention strategies