IIBA CCBA Questions Answers

 According to the BABOK® Guide, a business analyst (BA) should manage and maintain the requirements throughout the business analysis process. This includes prioritizing the requirements based on their relative value, risk, difficulty of implementation, and stakeholder preferences. A BA should also document the rationale for the prioritization and communicate any changes to the relevant stakeholders. In this scenario, the BA should update the priority of the five requirements that are now mandatory due to new government regulations, and record the reason for doing so. This way, the BA can ensure that the requirements reflect the current business needs and comply with the external constraints. The BA can also inform the project team and other affected stakeholders about the changes and their implications for the project scope, schedule, budget, and quality. References:

• [BABOK® Guide], section 4.5: Manage Requirements
• CCBA Exam Questions & Answers with Explanations, question 416

The communication method was inappropriate because the BA sent a 600-page document without any summary or explanation to all stakeholders, which is likely to overwhelm and confuse them. The BA should have chosen a more suitable format and level of detail to communicate the status of the requirements management process, such as a dashboard or a report. The business rules, the distribution, and the models were not the main issues in this situation. References: BABOK Guide v3, page 50; CCBA Mock Test, question 17

Explaining that the models are complementation to each other is a technique that helps to resolve the conflict by showing the benefits and limitations of each model, and how they can be used together to provide a more complete and accurate representation of the requirements1. Explaining that the models are complementation to each other can help the BA to satisfy both stakeholders, who may have different preferences or perspectives on how to describe the requirements. This technique can also enhance the quality and clarity of the requirements, as different models can capture different aspects or levels of detail of the requirements2. The other options are not appropriate techniques that the BA should use to resolve the conflict, as they may create or exacerbate issues, gaps, or inconsistencies in the requirements. Allowing both stakeholders to work on the models independently may result in duplication, contradiction, or misalignment of the requirements. Introducing a third model type may confuse or frustrate the stakeholders, who may not be familiar or comfortable with the new model. Suggesting a fusion model may not be feasible or effective, as different models may have different notations, semantics, or purposes. References:

• 1: How to Resolve Conflicts Between Stakeholders Over Requirements Models
• 2: Why Use Multiple Models to Describe Requirements?

 In the context of the Certification of Capability in Business Analysis™ (CCBA®), when examining and analyzing the relationship between a set of requirements, it is crucial to verify that the requirements are unambiguous. This means ensuring that there is a genuine relationship between the requirements and that the type of relationship is clearly described. The BA should look for clear, well-defined connections that contribute to a coherent understanding of the requirements as a whole.

References: The information is based on the standards and guidelines provided by the International Institute of Business Analysis (IIBA®) in the BABOK® Guide and CCBA® certification resources