Free Managing-Cloud-Security Questions Attempt

Threat modeling is the approach that helps developers prepare for common application vulnerabilities in cloud environments. Managing Cloud principles explain that threat modeling is a proactive security activity performed during the design and development phases of an application.

This approach involves identifying potential threats, attack vectors, and weaknesses based on application architecture, data flows, trust boundaries, and usage patterns. By anticipating how attackers may exploit cloud-specific characteristics—such as exposed APIs, shared resources, and identity-based access—developers can design controls to mitigate risks early in the lifecycle.

Sandboxing and application virtualization are isolation techniques rather than preparation methods, and multitenancy describes a cloud architecture characteristic. Threat modeling directly supports secure design by aligning security controls with known vulnerability patterns. Therefore, threat modeling is the correct answer.

Entity relationship and data flow diagrams can significantly speed up the process of identifying a suitable cloud service provider. Managing Cloud guidance explains that these diagrams document how applications, systems, and data interact across the enterprise.

By understanding data sensitivity, integration points, trust boundaries, and workloads, organizations can quickly determine which cloud service models, security controls, and compliance capabilities are required from a CSP. This enables efficient evaluation and comparison of providers.

Physical plant blueprints and egress safety designs are facilities-related documents, while BCDR plans focus on recovery strategies rather than provider selection. Therefore, entity relationship and data flow diagrams are the most useful documents for accelerating CSP identification.

The Information Security Plan is a key requirement of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) designed to protect private customer data. Managing Cloud guidance explains that GLBA requires financial institutions to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive written information security program.

This plan must describe administrative, technical, and physical safeguards used to protect customer information. It includes risk assessment, security controls, monitoring, and incident response procedures. The objective is to ensure the confidentiality and integrity of sensitive financial data throughout its lifecycle.

The other options are not explicit GLBA requirements. Independent audits and gap analyses may support compliance efforts but are not mandated components. Limited scope definition is not a GLBA safeguard. Therefore, the information security plan is the correct requirement.

NIST SP 800-37 provides a detailed guide for implementing the Risk Management Framework (RMF). Managing Cloud documentation explains that this framework offers a structured process for integrating security and risk management into system development and operational activities.

NIST SP 800-37 outlines steps such as categorizing systems, selecting and implementing security controls, assessing effectiveness, authorizing systems, and continuous monitoring. This lifecycle-based approach helps organizations manage risk in cloud and traditional environments consistently.

ISO 31000 provides general risk management principles, ISO 27001 focuses on information security management systems, and PCI DSS is a compliance standard. Therefore, NIST SP 800-37 is the correct guide for implementing the RMF.