Exactprep ITIL-4-Specialist-Create-Deliver-and-Support Questions

This approach is most closely aligned with the guiding principle of progress iteratively with feedback (B). The ITIL 4 Specialist: Create, Deliver and Support guide (Section 2.1.2) states: "Progress iteratively with feedback involves delivering work in smaller increments, using feedback from users to refine and improve services, ensuring alignment with needs and enhancing value stream efficiency." The two-week updates and user input exemplify this principle, contrasting with option A (holistic focus), option C (value focus without iteration), or option D (automation emphasis). The guide adds: "This principle supports rapid adaptation and quality improvement."

Collaborationis fundamentally aboutfocusing on the organization’s goals, ensuring that different teams and individuals work together toward shared outcomes.

Continuous integration (CI) is a practice that involves frequently integrating code changes into a shared repository, allowing teams to detect and resolve issues early. In the context of the scenario, where delays occur due to developers using individual repositories, CI would help by enabling regular integration of code, reducing conflicts, and streamlining the development process. This aligns with the ITIL 4 Specialist: Create, Deliver and Support guidance on optimizing value streams through effective planning and building practices. The official ITIL 4 CDS study guide (Section 2.2.1) emphasizes that CI reduces delays by automating integration and testing, which is critical when managing service creation and changes. Other options like continuous delivery (B) and continuous deployment (C) are subsequent steps that build on CI, while continual improvement (D) is a broader practice not specifically addressing the repository issue.

The best way is to prioritize queues using a combination of criteria to maximize value and minimize risks (B). The ITIL 4 Specialist: Create, Deliver and Support study guide (Section 4.2.3) states: "Prioritization should balance impact, urgency, and value, ensuring efficient resource use and timely resolution, especially in uneven demand scenarios." This approach adapts to fluctuating query volumes, unlike option A which focuses on profit (less relevant for a charity), option C which is costly and may not address root causes, or option D which restricts access. The guide notes: "Dynamic prioritization enhances service desk resilience under variable workloads."