Analytics-Admn-201 Exam Results

Data-driven alerts in Tableau Server allow users to receive notifications when data in a view meets certain conditions (e.g., a sales metric exceeds a threshold). By default, this feature is disabled for a site unless explicitly enabled by an administrator.

Option C (Change the data-driven alerts setting on the new site's Settings page): This is the correct answer. In the Tableau Server web interface, a site administrator can navigate to the site’s Settings > General page and enable the option "Let users create data-driven alerts." This must be done manually because the default setting for a new site is disabled. Once enabled, users with appropriate permissions (e.g., Viewer, Explorer, or Creator roles) can create alerts on views they have access to.

Option A (Enable data-driven alerts on the TSM Configuration page): This is incorrect because the TSM Configuration page (accessed via the TSM web UI or CLI) manages server-wide settings like ports, authentication, and processes, not site-specific features like data-driven alerts.

Option B (Run the tsm configuration set -k dataAlerts.checkIntervalInMinutes -v 60 command): This is incorrect. The dataAlerts.checkIntervalInMinutes key controls how frequently Tableau Server checks alert conditions (default is 60 minutes), but it does not enable the feature itself. The feature must first be turned on at the site level.

Option D (No action is necessary): This is incorrect because the default setting for data-driven alerts is off for new sites, requiring explicit action to enable it.

Tableau Server’s performance and stability depend on dedicated resources and proper configuration. Running additional software on the same server is the most likely to cause problems because:

Resource contention: Tableau Server requires significant CPU, RAM, and disk I/O. Other software (e.g., databases, web servers) can compete for these resources, leading to slowdowns, crashes, or failed tasks.

Port conflicts: Tableau uses specific ports (e.g., 80, 443, 8850), and other applications might interfere.

Security risks: Additional software increases the attack surface, potentially compromising Tableau Server.

Tableau recommends running the server on dedicated hardware without unrelated applications.

Option A (Running additional software on the server): Correct. This is a common cause of performance issues and is explicitly discouraged in Tableau’s best practices.

Option B (Separating the Backgrounder and VizQL processes to different machines): Incorrect. This is a supported multi-node configuration that can improve performance, not cause problems, if properly set up via TSM.

Option C (Configuring the server to use a static IP address): Incorrect. A static IP is recommended for Tableau Server to ensure consistent network access, so it’s unlikely to cause issues.

Option D (Using a non-default installation path): Incorrect. While not default, a custom path is supported (via TSM or installer options) and unlikely to cause problems if permissions and disk space are adequate.

In Tableau Server, projects are containers for organizing and securing content. They help manage permissions and structure content hierarchically. Let’s define what can be contained:

Workbooks: Visualizations and dashboards published to the Server.

Data Sources: Published connections or extracts reusable across workbooks.

Nested Projects: Sub-projects within a parent project, introduced in later versions (e.g., 2018.2) for deeper organization.

Option B (Workbooks): Correct. Workbooks are the primary content type in projects, containing views and dashboards.

Option C (Nested Projects): Correct. Nested projects allow hierarchical structuring (e.g., a "Sales" project with "Q1" and "Q2" sub-projects), with inherited or custom permissions.

Option D (Data Sources): Correct. Published data sources reside in projects, providing reusable data connections.

Option A (Groups): Incorrect. Groups are collections of users managed at the site or server level, not stored within projects. Projects contain content, not user entities.

Why This Matters: Projects are key to content governance—knowing what they hold helps administrators organize and secure assets effectively.

Editing permissions on a workbook in Tableau Server depends on the user’s role and the project’s permission settings. Since permissions are not locked (i.e., "Managed by Owner"), let’s dissect who can edit them:

Permission Model:

Not Locked: Owners of content (workbooks, data sources) can set permissions, and Project Leaders can override at the project level.

Site Roles: Define maximum capabilities (e.g., Viewer, Explorer, Creator).

Capabilities: "Set Permissions" is explicit—only certain users get it.

Option C (The workbook’s owner): Correct.

Details: The owner (typically the publisher) has full control over their workbook when permissions are Managed by Owner:

How: In the UI, go to Content > Workbooks > Actions > Permissions—owners can edit rules (e.g., grant Editor to a group).

Site Role: Minimum of Explorer (can publish) or Creator to publish, ensuring "Set Permissions" capability.

Why: Ownership inherently includes permission management unless locked.

Option D (Users set to Project Leader for the workbook’s project): Correct.

Details: Project Leaders are assigned via Content > Projects > Actions > Permissions > Set Project Leader:

Power: Can edit permissions for all content in the project, even if not the owner.

Site Role: Requires Site Administrator or Server Administrator (Creator/Explorer variants suffice).

Why: Overrides ownership in Managed by Owner mode—ensures project-level governance.

Option A (Users with project and workbook Viewer role): Incorrect.

Why: Viewer role (site-level) limits users to viewing—lacks "Set Permissions" capability, regardless of project/workbook rules.

Option B (Users with workbook Interactor role): Incorrect.

Why: "Interactor" isn’t a standard role—likely a misnomer for Explorer or Viewer with interaction permissions (e.g., Filter). No permission-editing rights exist here.

Why This Matters: Knowing who can edit permissions prevents access control gaps—crucial for collaborative or regulated environments.