RCA Exam Dumps : Relativity Certified Administrator

The correct answer is A. Relativity. Relativity’s Processing throughput guidance states that internal performance testing has shown the Relativity text extraction method to be at least two times faster than the native method on Excel, Word, and PowerPoint file types, and also less error-prone than native extraction. Since the question asks for the best method to get a large Excel-only data set to review as quickly as possible, the documented speed advantage makes Relativity the best answer.

The native-based methods are slower according to that same documentation, even though they may have other use cases. The processing profile documentation also shows that native/failover combinations are available configurations, but the performance guidance specifically favors the Relativity extraction method for speed on Excel files. “Extract and place inline” is not the documented Excel text extraction method choice for this question. Therefore, the fastest and most review-efficient choice for large Excel files is Relativity.

The correct answer is A. The field to use for production numbering. Relativity’s documentation distinguishes between production set settings and production data source settings . The production set defines overarching settings such as document numbering , appearance of numbering, and related production-wide behaviors. By contrast, the production data source page includes settings such as production type , placeholder image format , burn redactions , burn native redactions , burn PDF redactions , and markup set .

This means the field used for production numbering is not configured at the individual data source level; it belongs to the production set itself. The other options are all part of production data source configuration. The documentation explicitly shows Burn Redactions and Markup Set , and placeholder behavior is also configured within the production data source settings.

Therefore, the option that cannot be configured when creating a new production data source is the field to use for production numbering , because that is a production-set-level setting rather than a data-source-level one.

The correct answer is D. Check the box to export multiple-choice fields as nested. Relativity’s official export documentation states that Export Multiple Choice Fields as Nested is the option used to maintain the hierarchy of Relativity multiple-choice lists during export. It further explains that the nested value delimiter is a backslash, which preserves the parent-child structure of those choices in the exported data.

This means the hierarchy is not lost by default if the appropriate export option is selected, so option A is incorrect. Sorting on the field does not preserve the nested hierarchy, making option B wrong. Exporting as CSV for Excel recognition is also not the documented mechanism, so option C is incorrect. From an RCA and data loading standpoint, this setting matters because exported hierarchical values often need to be re-used downstream, re-imported, or validated in a way that preserves their original structure. Without the nested export option, the relationship between parent and child values may not be represented correctly. Therefore, the proper way to maintain multiple-choice hierarchy when exporting a saved search through Import/Export is to check the box to export multiple-choice fields as nested .