NCE-ABE Exam Dumps : National Counselor Examination

Within the Career Development core area, counselors are trained to view work, career, and leisure as integrated components of overall life satisfaction and well-being. A foundational assumption is that:

Individuals can meet psychological needs (e.g., achievement, affiliation, autonomy, creativity, meaning) through both work roles and leisure activities.

Satisfaction in life may arise from a combination of paid employment, unpaid roles, and leisure pursuits, depending on the client’s values and circumstances.

Thus:

Option C reflects the principle that personal need satisfaction and fulfillment can come from either or both work and leisure, which guides holistic counseling around lifestyle, not just employment.

Options A and D overemphasize a rigid “work-first” ethic and are more value-laden than is appropriate for ethical, client-centered counseling.

Option B assumes that leisure is “preferable” for most adults, which is not supported as a universal counseling assumption and may conflict with many clients’ values around meaningful work.

Therefore, the assumption most aligned with CACREP-based career counseling concepts is C. Personal need satisfaction may be derived from either work or leisure activities.

In the Professional Counseling Orientation and Ethical Practice core area, counselors are taught to follow ethical procedures when addressing suspected ethical violations by colleagues, consistent with codes such as the ACA Code of Ethics. These standards state that when a counselor believes that another professional has violated an ethical standard, they should:

First attempt an informal resolution, when appropriate,

Approach the colleague directly, in a respectful, private manner,

Discuss the concern and encourage corrective action.

Only when informal resolution is not appropriate, not effective, or the violation is severe or poses immediate harm are more formal actions (e.g., reporting to supervisors, licensing boards, or professional organizations) recommended. In this situation, Counselor B’s behavior appears to violate confidentiality, but there is no indication that a direct, private conversation would be unsafe or impossible.

Therefore, in line with CACREP-aligned ethics instruction, Counselor A should first attempt to address the concern informally by speaking privately with Counselor B, making B the correct answer.

In the Counseling Skills and Interventions work behavior area, counselors are expected to select interventions that are supported by empirical evidence for the client’s specific concerns, including substance use disorders.

Motivational interviewing (MI) (Option A) is a widely researched, empirically supported treatment modality for individuals with substance use disorders. It is a client-centered, directive approach designed to:

Enhance intrinsic motivation for change,

Resolve ambivalence,

Support clients in moving through stages of change regarding substance use.

Core MI skills often summarized as OARS (open questions, affirmations, reflections, summaries) are used to elicit and strengthen “change talk” and reduce resistance. Research has consistently shown MI’s effectiveness in reducing substance use and increasing treatment engagement across various populations and settings.

Why the other options are less appropriate here:

B. Narrative therapy – While potentially helpful for meaning-making and identity reconstruction, it is not the primary empirically validated front-line modality for substance use disorders.

C. Solution-focused brief therapy – Has some supportive evidence for various problems and can be useful in certain substance-related contexts, but MI has a stronger and more direct evidence base specifically for substance use disorders.

D. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) – Primarily validated for trauma-related disorders, particularly PTSD, rather than as a core, primary treatment for substance use disorders.

NBCC-aligned counselor work behaviors emphasize that practitioners should match interventions to the problem using approaches with strong empirical support, making motivational interviewing the best choice among the options for treating substance use disorders.

Top of Form

Bottom of Form