IEPPE Exam Dumps : Internationally Educated Professional Practice Exam

1. What is Alternative G2?

In this scenario, the professionalrejects the outside job offer but does not inform their employer about the situation.

2. Ethical Problem in Alternative G2

Failure to Communicate:

Even though they areavoiding a direct conflict of interest,they are still withholding important information from their employer.

Transparency is required in professional ethics.

Risk of Misunderstanding:

If the client assumesthey were unfairly turned down,they may form a negative opinion of the employer.

This could damage the employer-client relationship.

3. Real-World Example: Why Transparency Matters

Scenario:

A structural engineering technologistis offered consulting work on a project by a major construction firm.

They reject the offer butdo not disclose it to their current employer.

Later,the employer finds out that the client was upset and lost trust in the company.

4. Why Option D is Correct:

Not disclosing the situation could lead to unintended damage to business relationships.

Transparency is a key part of professional ethics.

Non est factum(Latin for"it is not my deed") is a legal defense used whena person signs a contract but did not understand its nature due to a fundamental mistake.

Step-by-Step Explanation:

Definition of Non Est Factum–

Applies whena person unknowingly signs a contract that is entirely different from what they intended to sign.

The personmust prove they were not carelessin signing it.

When Is It Used?

Used byindividuals with disabilities (e.g., blindness, illiteracy)who were misled about the contract’s nature.

Why Option D Is Correct:

The doctrineprotects individuals who genuinely did not understandwhat they were signing.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A (Unsound mind)– People withmental incapacitymay use a different legal defense.

B (Alcohol or drugs)– Being intoxicateddoes not automatically invalidate acontract.

C (Corporations overstepping charters)– This involvescorporate law, not non est factum.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

In this scenario, Mike is a Certified Technician (C.Tech.) working in a municipal government infrastructure department. As a professional under the Ontario Association of Certified Engineering Technicians and Technologists (OACETT), he is required to adhere to the Code of Ethics and Professional Practice Guidelines.

Ethical and Professional Responsibility:

Public Safety and Welfare:

OACETT’s Code of Ethics explicitly states that certified members must prioritize public welfare and safety over financial or business interests.

The design flaw in the water catchment system makes the area highly susceptible to flooding during severe rainfall, which presents a safety hazard for the community.

Professional Responsibility and Accountability:

As a C.Tech., Mike has a duty to identify and report deficiencies in engineering designs that could result in public harm.

By stamping the flawed design, Mike would be accepting responsibility for a system that he knows is inadequate, which could lead to legal liability, professional discipline, or reputational damage.

Consequences of Stamping the Design:

If Mike proceeds with stamping the design despite knowing its flaws, he could face disciplinary action from OACETT.

The correct answer, B, indicates that the developer (or another stakeholder) could file a professional practice complaint against him with OACETT.

OACETT may then conduct an investigation under its disciplinary procedures, which could result in penalties such as:

Reprimand or Suspension of Certification

Revocation of Membership

Fines or Other Professional Sanctions

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

Option A (Incorrect):

There is a professional practice issue because stamping a flawed design that compromises public safety violates OACETT's ethical and professional standards.

Option C (Incorrect):

While the manager may value Mike’s decision to comply, supporting a flawed design does not align with professional integrity.

Promotions should be based on ethical and competent practice, not on avoiding conflicts with developers.

Option D (Incorrect):

The question does not mention solar panel installation.

Additional technical courses are not an appropriate consequence in this case, as the issue is not a lack of technical expertise but an ethical and professional responsibility failure.

References to Certified Engineering Technologist (CET) Objectives and Documents:

OACETT Code of Ethics: “Members shall regard the welfare of the public, the environment, and the employer as paramount.”

Professional Misconduct under the Ontario Professional Engineers Act and OACETT Bylaws: Stamping or approving a flawed design knowingly can be considered negligence or professional misconduct.

Risk Management in Engineering Practice: Ethical engineers and technologists must identify risks and ensure that public safety concerns are addressed, regardless of business pressures.

By refusing to stamp the design, Mike upholds his professional integrity and protects public safety, fulfilling his ethical obligations as a Certified Technician.