IEPPE Exam Dumps : Internationally Educated Professional Practice Exam

Non est factum(Latin for"it is not my deed") is a legal defense used whena person signs a contract but did not understand its nature due to a fundamental mistake.

Step-by-Step Explanation:

Definition of Non Est Factum–

Applies whena person unknowingly signs a contract that is entirely different from what they intended to sign.

The personmust prove they were not carelessin signing it.

When Is It Used?

Used byindividuals with disabilities (e.g., blindness, illiteracy)who were misled about the contract’s nature.

Why Option D Is Correct:

The doctrineprotects individuals who genuinely did not understandwhat they were signing.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A (Unsound mind)– People withmental incapacitymay use a different legal defense.

B (Alcohol or drugs)– Being intoxicateddoes not automatically invalidate acontract.

C (Corporations overstepping charters)– This involvescorporate law, not non est factum.

Aconflict of interestarises whena professional’s personal or business interests interfere with their public duty. Full disclosureis essentialin maintaining trust and integrity.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:

1. Why Conflicts of Interest Must Be Disclosed:

Acity council member who owns a business that bids on city contractshasinsider influence.

Not disclosing this conflictisunethical and legally questionable.

2. Real-World Example:

Amunicipal engineersits ona public infrastructure boardand their private firmsubmits a bid for a major road project.

They must disclose the conflict and recuse themselves from decisions affecting their company.

3. Why Option B Is Correct:

Transparency and disclosure are required under professional ethics and law.

4. Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A (Public safety is paramount)– Important, butconflict of interest is the core issue.

C (Undertake work only when qualified)–Not the main concern here.

D (Fairness & courtesy)– Fairness is important, butdisclosure of conflicts is the primary requirement.

Anethical problem arises when valid concerns are ignored, leading to preventable failures.

Step-by-Step Explanation:

Ethical Obligation to Address Issues:

Professionalsmust report and advocate for technical fixeswhen risks exist.

Ignoring problems can lead to system failures, data breaches, or unsafe operations.

Why Option D Is Correct:

Themanager dismissed concernsinstead of investigating.

Theorganization suffered negative consequences, proving the issue was valid.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A, B (No serious impact)– Ethical failuresmust lead to negative outcomesto be classified as unsuccessful attempts.

C (Managers addressed the concern)– If concerns are acted upon,this is a successful resolution.