H12-831_V1.0 Exam Dumps : HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology V1.0

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Understanding the LSA Table in the Figure

The LSA Type displayed in the LSDB of R3 is an Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA (Type 9), with the following attributes:

LS Type: Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA (Type 9)

Link State ID: 0.0.0.1

Originating Router: 10.0.2.2 (R2)

Referenced LSA Type: 0x2001 (Router-LSA, Type 1)

Referenced Link State ID: 0.0.0.0

Referenced Originating Router: 10.0.2.2 (R2)

Prefix: 2000:2::/128

Analysis of the Statement

What is an Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA (Type 9)?

Used in OSPFv3 to advertise IPv6 prefixes associated with a Router-LSA (Type 1) or Network-LSA (Type 2).

Each router generates its own Router-LSA (Type 1) and references it in an Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA (Type 9).

How does this apply to R3's LSDB?

The LSA is generated by R2 (10.0.2.2), meaning R2 originated the prefix advertisement.

The referenced LSA is a Router-LSA, indicating that the IPv6 prefix is associated with R2's router advertisement.

Since R3 sees this LSA in its LSDB, it means R2 has advertised its IPv6 prefix (2000:2::/128) into the OSPFv3 domain.

✅ Since the LSA describes an IPv6 prefix associated with R2’s Router-LSA, the statement is TRUE.

Final Conclusion:

✅ The LSA is generated by R2 and describes the IPv6 prefix associated with the Router-LSA.✅ Thus, the correct answer is: A. TRUE.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

To determine the cost value of the route 10.0.35.0/24 in the routing table of R1, let's analyze the possible shortest paths from R1 to R3 (which owns the 10.0.35.0/24 network) based on the given OSPF link costs:

Path 1: R1 → R2 → R3

R1 to R2: Cost = 20

R2 to R3: Cost = 10

Total Cost = 20 + 10 = 30

Path 2: R1 → R4 → R3

R1 to R4: Cost = 10

R4 to R3: Cost = 10

Total Cost = 10 + 10 = 20 ✅ (Lowest cost path)

Path 3: R1 → R5 → R3

R1 to R5: Cost = 10

R5 to R3: Cost = 10

Total Cost = 10 + 10 = 20 ✅ (Equal-cost path)

Final Calculation:

The two best equal-cost paths (R1 → R4 → R3 and R1 → R5 → R3) have a cost of 20.

Since OSPF supports equal-cost multi-path (ECMP) routing and maximum load-balancing 8 is enabled, OSPF will install both routes into the routing table with the same cost of 20.

The path R1 → R2 → R3 has a higher cost (30) and will not be chosen.

Final Answer: ✅ 20 (Option C)

References:

HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology V1.0 – OSPF Route Calculation & Load Balancing

OSPF Equal-Cost Multi-Path (ECMP) and Route Selection

OSPF Fast Reroute (FRR) Mechanism

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Understanding the OSPF Network Structure in the Question:

OSPF Areas & Routers:

Area 3: Contains R5 (which has loopback 10.0.5.5/32).

Area 1: Contains R6.

Area 2: Contains R4.

Area 0 (Backbone Area): Contains R1, R2, and R3 (which interconnect the other areas).

ACL 2000 Filtering Rule:

The ACL rule 2000 explicitly denies 10.0.5.5/32 from being imported.

The filter 2000 import command applies this filter to Area 0, preventing routes from Area 3 (including R5's loopback) from being learned by Area 0 routers (R1, R2, and R3).

Route Distribution Analysis:

R5 (Area 3):

R5 has 10.0.5.5/32 configured on its Loopback0.

Since OSPF is enabled, R5 advertises the route to R6 in Area 1.

R6 (Area 1) → R2 (Area 0, Backbone Router):

Without filtering, R6 would normally propagate 10.0.5.5/32 to R2 (since R2 is a backbone router in Area 0).

However, since ACL 2000 is applied in Area 0, R2 blocks this route from being imported.

Therefore, R2 does not learn 10.0.5.5/32.

R2 → R1 and R3 (Both in Area 0):

R2 would typically share any learned routes with R1 and R3 in Area 0.

But since R2 itself does not have 10.0.5.5/32, neither R1 nor R3 can receive it.

Thus, R1 and R3 also do not have 10.0.5.5/32 in their routing tables.

R4 (Area 2) is Unaffected:

Since R4 is in Area 2, it is not directly impacted by the filter applied in Area 0.

It can still receive the route via another path if redistribution is configured properly.

Final Conclusion:

R1, R2, and R3 do not have the 10.0.5.5/32 route due to the filter 2000 import command applied in Area 0.

R4 may still have the route since it is not affected by the filtering in Area 0.

Thus, the correct answer is:✅ R1, R3, R2 do not have the route 10.0.5.5/32 in their routing tables.