ESRS-Professional Exam Dumps : ESRS Professional Certification Exam

Under the ESRS framework, financial materiality is assessed based on a combination of:

Likelihood of occurrence– The probability that a sustainability matter will have a financial impact.

Potential magnitude of financial effects– The scale of the impact on financial position, performance, cash flows, access to finance, or cost of capital over short-, medium-, or long-term periods​.

This is outlined in ESRS 1, which states that a sustainability matter isfinancially materialif it could reasonably be expected totrigger material financial effectson an undertaking. Financial materiality is not limited to issues under the direct control of the company; it includesdependencies on natural, human, and social resourcesthat could create risks or opportunities​.

Option A:The ESRS framework allows for bothqualitative and quantitative thresholds, not just monetary ones (e.g., revenue or costs)​.

Option C:Reputational risks can be financially material, as they may affect access to finance, cost of capital, or customer trust, ultimately influencing the company’s financial performance​.

Option D:Thefinancial materiality assessmentis conducted for theshort-, medium-, and long-term, not just the short term​.

Why the other options are incorrect:References:

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772​

Compilation Explanations January - July 2024, ESRS 1 on Financial Materiality​

EFRAG Guidance on Double Materiality and Risk Assessments​

TheCorporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)includes specificreporting mandatesthat organizations must comply with. Below is an evaluation of each option:

A. True– The CSRD requires organizations to conduct adouble materiality assessment, considering bothfinancial materiality(impact on the company’s financial position) andimpact materiality(the company’s impact on the environment and society)​.

B. True– Organizations reporting under the CSRD mustfollow a specific reporting format, which includes structured disclosures usingEuropean Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS)​.

C. False– The CSRDapplies to both EU and non-EU companiesthat have operations in the EU and meet the reporting threshold criteria. Non-EU companies generatingmore than €150 millionin annual turnover in the EU and having at leastone EU-based subsidiary or branchare subject to CSRD requirements​.

D. True– The CSRD isinterlinked with other EU legislation, including theEU Taxonomy Regulationand theSustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), ensuring companies align with broader EU sustainability goals​.

E. False– Organizations must report onvalue chain informationas part of theimpact, risk, and opportunity (IRO) management processwithin the ESRS framework​.

F. False– The CSRD mandatesexternal assurancefor sustainability reports, starting withlimited assuranceand progressing towardreasonable assurancein the coming years​.

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, Sections onDouble Materiality, Reporting Format, and Value Chain Information​.

EU Taxonomy Regulation & SFDR– Linkages with CSRD​.

Official References:

According to the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) under the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, stakeholders are defined as individuals or groups who can affect or be affected by the undertaking. The ESRS distinguishes between two main groups of stakeholders:

Affected stakeholders: These are individuals or groups whose interests are affected or could be affected – positively or negatively – by the undertaking’s activities and its direct and indirect business relationships across its value chain.

Users of sustainability statements: These include primary users of general-purpose financial reporting (e.g., existing and potential investors, lenders, and other creditors such as asset managers, credit institutions, and insurance undertakings) and other users, including the undertaking’s business partners, trade unions, social partners, civil society and non-governmental organizations, governments, analysts, and academics​.

Furthermore, engagement with affected stakeholders is a crucial aspect of the undertaking’s ongoing due diligence process and sustainability materiality assessment. This involves identifying and assessing actual and potential negative impacts to inform the materiality assessment process for sustainability reporting​.

Official References:

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 of 31 July 2023 supplementing Directive 2013/34/EU on sustainability reporting standards​.

ESRS 1: General Requirements, Section 3.1 (Stakeholders and their relevance to the materiality assessment process).