Month End Sale 70% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: save70

CAMS-FCI Exam Dumps : Advanced CAMS-Financial Crimes Investigations

PDF
CAMS-FCI pdf
 Real Exam Questions and Answer
 Last Update: Jan 31, 2026
 Question and Answers: 101 With Explanation
 Compatible with all Devices
 Printable Format
 100% Pass Guaranteed
$25.5  $84.99
CAMS-FCI exam
PDF + Testing Engine
CAMS-FCI PDF + engine
 Both PDF & Practice Software
 Last Update: Jan 31, 2026
 Question and Answers: 101
 Discount Offer
 Download Free Demo
 24/7 Customer Support
$40.5  $134.99
Testing Engine
CAMS-FCI Engine
 Desktop Based Application
 Last Update: Jan 31, 2026
 Question and Answers: 101
 Create Multiple Test Sets
 Questions Regularly Updated
  90 Days Free Updates
  Windows and Mac Compatible
$30  $99.99

Verified By IT Certified Experts

CertsTopics.com Certified Safe Files

Up-To-Date Exam Study Material

99.5% High Success Pass Rate

100% Accurate Answers

Instant Downloads

Exam Questions And Answers PDF

Try Demo Before You Buy

Certification Exams with Helpful Questions And Answers

What our customers are saying

Austria certstopics Austria
Allison
Jan 2, 2026
I owe my guaranteed success in the CAMS-FCI exam to certstopics.com's real exams and competent IT experts.

Advanced CAMS-Financial Crimes Investigations Questions and Answers

Question 1

An investigator is reviewing a case generated from the transaction monitoring system, with two large amounts of incoming remittance (IR) to an individual customer. Based on the KYC profile, the customer is a plant manager of a famous multi-national electronics manufacturing firm. As the customer has no similarly large transaction patterns for the past 2 years, the investigator sends an inquiry to the relationship manager (RM) about the nature of the transaction. The RM replies that the transaction is a consultancy fee provided from two different electronics companies with a debit note provided However, there is no detail of service provided on the debit note, and the remitters are two individuals.

Which actions should the investigator recommend to mitigate risk? (Select Two.)

Options:

A.

Exit the relationship with the customer.

B.

Document and maintain a file with the investigative findings.

C.

Discuss the investigation findings with the customer.

D.

Conduct enhanced due diligence.

E.

Re-evaluate the customer risk profile.

Buy Now
Question 2

A client with many personal and business deposits with the financial institution (Fl) seeks a business loan. The client wants to guarantee the loan with a trust for which they are the beneficiary.

An investigator examines the trust. The trust has many layers, including shell companies in known tax havens. The client's ultimate beneficial ownership claim cannot be validated, and the loan is denied.

Two months later, the Fl receives a law enforcement (LE) request on one of the client's business accounts. While reviewing the business account, the Fl receives another LE request on the same account from another agency. The requested information is shared.

Three months later, a branch manager receives a request to open a business deposit account related to a complex trust. The manager forwarded the request because of the complexity. The trust was the same as the previously examined trust, but the request came from a different client. The second client also has many accounts with the Fl. Further inspection finds links between the second client and the Paradise Papers. The Papers state the client led illegal activities and committed tax evasion.

What steps should the investigator take to review the accounts held by the second client who is listed in the Paradise Papers? (Select Two.)

Options:

A.

Recommend a SAR/STR be filed regarding the second client's use of a questionable trust to open an account.

B.

Review all accounts being reviewed by AML investigators over the past year that have opened trust accounts.

C.

Inform Fl management of deficiencies in their AML program because the second client's activities were not detected.

D.

Monitor all accounts and entities related to the second client

E.

Inform Fl management of the start of a serious risk-based investigation that could result in losses and reputation risk.

Question 3

A KYC specialist from the first line of defense at a bank initiates an internal escalation based on a letter of credit received by the bank.

MEMO

To: Jane Doe. Compliance Manager, Bank B From: Jack Brown, KYC Specialist, Bank B RE: Concerning letter of credit

A letter of credit (LC) was received from a correspondent bank. Bank A. in Country A. in Asia with strict capital controls, providing guarantee of payment to Bank B's client for the export of 10 luxury cars located in Country B. located in Europe. Bank A's customer is a general in the army where Bank A is headquartered.

The information contained in the LC is as follows:

• Advising amount per unit 30.000.00 EU •10 units of BMW

• Model IX3

• Year of registration: 2020

Upon checks on Bank B's client, the exporter mentioned that the transactions were particularly important, and a fast process would be much appreciated in order to avoid reputational damage to the firm and the banks involved in the trade finance process. The exporter has a longstanding relationship with Bank B and was clearly a good income generator. The exporter indicated that, as a general, the importer was trustworthy.

The relationship manager

Feedback from the RM:

The RM contacted the exporter for a client courtesy visit, but it was rearranged four times as the exporter kept cancelling the appointments. When the exporter was finally pinned down for an interview, employees were reluctant to provide clear answers about the basis of the transaction. The employees were evasive when asked about the wider business and trade activity in the country.

Findings from the investigation from various internal and external sources of information:

• There were no negative news or sanctions hits on the exporter company, directors, and shareholders.

• The registered address of the exporting business was a residential address.

• The price of the cats was checked and confirmed to be significantly below the market price of approximately 70,000 EU, based on manufacturer's new price guide.

• The key controllers behind the exporting company, that is the directors and

During the investigation, the investigator determines that a nephew of the general.....

Options:

A.

should be treated well to avoid reputational damage to the bank

B.

is a high-net-worth individual

C.

should be flagged as a senior PEP.

D.

is a trustworthy source.