Free and Premium Nutanix NCP-MCI-6.10 Dumps Questions Answers

When performing aLife Cycle Manager (LCM) upgrade, therecommended way to stop the process is to use the “Stop Update” feature in LCM (Option D).

Option A (Cancel via Ergon ecli)is not a recommended approach since manually interfering with running tasks can cause inconsistencies.

Option B (lcm_task_cleanup.py script)is used for post-upgrade cleanup but does not stop ongoing updates.

Option C (Restarting Genesis)does not stop an LCM upgrade and can cause instability.

Metro Availability requires that VMs always read data from their primary site to maintain optimal performance and prevent remote data access latency.

Option C (Migrate the VM to its primary site and set appropriate rules) is correct:

If a VMfails over to the secondary sitebut is still running in the primary site, it will read data remotely, causinghigh latency and performance issues.

The solution is tomigrate the VM back to the primary siteand configureDRS rulesorhost affinity settingsto prevent unwanted movement.

Option A is incorrect:

The command listsactive Metro Availability protection domainsbut doesnot resolvethe issue.

Option B is incorrect:

Must-affinity rules can help, but they should be configuredafter migrating the VM back to the primary site.

Option D is incorrect:

RunningNCC health checkswill onlydiagnose the issue, not resolve it.

Agent VMs, such as CVMs (Controller VMs) or Witness VMs, have strict affinity and anti-affinity rules to ensure they remain on specific hosts and maintain data consistency and high availability. If an agent VM is powered off and then manually started on another host, it becomes unresponsive because it breaks these rules.

From theNutanix Enterprise Cloud Administration (ECA)course materials:

“Agent VMs have specific configuration and affinity constraints. Manually starting them on another host violates these constraints, resulting in the agent VM becoming unresponsive to the cluster.”

Further clarification:

“The cluster expects the agent VM to be on a particular host. Moving it manually to another host breaks this expectation and causes the VM to be unable to properly join the cluster services, leading to an unresponsive state.”

Therefore, it is essential to avoid manually starting agent VMs on different hosts, as doing so can disrupt cluster services.

Moving vDisks to a storage container with compression enabled ensures better data efficiency without downtime.

Option A (Migrate vDisks) is correct:

vDisk migration is non-disruptiveand allows compression settings to be applied dynamically.

Option B (Recreate the VM) is incorrect:

Rebuilding the VM is unnecessaryand would causedowntime.

Option C (Migrate the VM) is incorrect:

VM migration does not guarantee that only vDisks move, and it may disrupt performance.

Option D (Recreate vDisk) is incorrect:

This method ismanual and time-consuming, while Nutanix provides anautomated approach.

By default, Nutanix Prism Central retains the last 10 instances of a report if no retention policy is configured.

Option B (10) is correct:

Nutanixstores up to 10 reports, after which older reports areautomatically deleted.

Options A (5), C (15), and D (20) are incorrect:

Whileretention policies can be customized, thedefault setting is 10 reports.

Themost efficient wayto allow team leads to manage aspecific set of VMsis bycreating a Project (Option C)in Prism Central and assigning the team leads to that Project.

Nutanix Projects allow administrators to control VM accessbased on groups and permissions, ensuring that users only manage VMs assigned to their project.

Option A (Role Mapping)applies more broadly to roles but does not restrict access to specific VM groups.

Option B (VPC Admin)is related to network segmentation, not VM access control.

Option D (Security Policies)are used for network and firewall rules, not VM access control.

Port mirroring requires the source and target VMs to be on the same host to efficiently copy network traffic without additional routing overhead.

Option B (Source VM and Target VM are on the same host) is correct:

AHV’s port mirroringonly works within a single hostbecause network packets are intercepted before leaving the hypervisor.

If the VMs are on different hosts,mirroring cannot be configured without additional network tools.

Option A (Same VLAN) is incorrect:

VLAN membership isnot a requirementfor port mirroring.

Option C (Same subnet) is incorrect:

Port mirroring happens atthe virtual switch level, which does not require VMs to be in the same subnet.

Option D (Same VPC) is incorrect:

While VPCs provide network isolation,they do not control port mirroring availability.

High SSD utilization in a hybrid cluster can lead to increased I/O latency as new writes may spill over to HDDs, reducing overall performance.

Option D (Average I/O latency in the cluster may increase) is correct:

If SSD usage isabove 75%,data tiering shifts to slower HDDs,increasing latency.

Option A is incorrect:

SSD failures are managed via redundancy policies (RF2/RF3), and high utilizationdoes not impact failure handling.

Option B is incorrect:

Metadata is stored separately, and high SSD usage does not mean metadata is at risk.

Option C is incorrect:

Clusters do not go into read-only mode due to high SSD utilization—they simply experienceperformance degradation.

When diagnosing CPU performance issues, CPU Ready Time and CPU Usage are the key indicators of whether more vCPUs are needed.

Option A (VM CPU Ready Time) is correct:

High CPU Ready Time means the VM is waiting for CPU resources, indicatingCPU contention.

Option B (VM CPU Usage) is correct:

If CPU usage isconsistently high, adding more vCPUsmay improve performance.

Option C (Host CPU Usage) is incorrect:

Host-wide CPU usage does not indicate whether a specific VM needs more vCPUs.

Option D (Host Memory Swap Out Rate) is incorrect:

Memory swappingaffects RAM performance, not CPU allocation.

The LCM (Life Cycle Manager) precheck failures in this scenario indicate an inability to connect to vCenter to validate ESXi-specific checks, such as LACP configuration, HA, and pinned VMs. The appropriate log to analyze the details of the LCM precheck failures is the 1cm_ops.out log.

From theNutanix Enterprise Cloud Administration (ECA)course materials:

“The 1cm_ops.out log file contains detailed output and error information related to LCM operations, including prechecks, execution, and post-checks. This log is essential for troubleshooting LCM framework failures and understanding the root cause of any issues preventing upgrades.”

A single vCPU is likely causing a bottleneck, limiting the VM’s ability to process I/O requests efficiently.

Option D (Increase the VM’s number of vCPUs) is correct:

Windowsrequires sufficient CPU resourcesto handle disk and network operations.

Adding more vCPUs allows the VM to process more I/O operations simultaneously, improving performance.

Option A is incorrect:

AdditionalvSCSI controllers are only useful for very high disk I/O workloads.

Option B is incorrect:

Balance-TCP applies to network traffic, not storage performance.

Option C is incorrect:

CVM resources do not directly affect individual VM performance.

Nutanix storage containers allow administrators to configure capacity reservations and advertised limits for better resource management.

Option D (Set Reserved Capacity to 10 GiB and Advertised Capacity to 500 GiB) is correct:

Reserved Capacityensures that10 GiB is always available for this container and not consumed by other containers.

Advertised Capacitydefines alogical limit of 500 GiBto prevent over-allocation.

Option A is incorrect:

Advertised Capacity of 10 GiB is too lowand does not match the requirement of a500 GiB storage container.

Option B is incorrect:

Only setting Advertised Capacity does not guarantee Reserved Capacity, meaning other containers could consume the reserved space.

Option C is incorrect:

Setting only Reserved Capacity does not enforce an upper limit, which could lead to overprovisioning.

Multicast traffic can generate unnecessary overhead if it is not properly managed.IGMP Snooping (Option C)ensures thatmulticast packets are only sent to VMs that have requested them, rather than broadcasting to all VMs.

Option C (IGMP Snooping) is correct:

Itreduces unnecessary multicast trafficby ensuring that only subscribed VMs receive the packets.

It is supportednatively in AHV networking.

Option A (LACP) is incorrect:

Link Aggregation Control Protocol (LACP)improves bandwidth and redundancy but doesnot control multicast traffic.

Option B (UDP) is incorrect:

UDP (User Datagram Protocol) is a transport protocol, not a network optimization feature.

Option D (Network Segmentation) is incorrect:

Segmentation (VLANs, VPCs) isolates networksbut does not optimizemulticast traffic specifically.

Duringfailover in Nutanix Disaster Recovery, VMs retain theirstatic IPsbut maylose DNS settingsif the network configuration at the DR site is different from the primary site.

Option B (Create custom in-guest scripts) is correct:

Custom scriptsallowWindows or Linux VMs to restore DNS settings automaticallyafter failover.

These scripts can be executed usingpost-failover automationin Nutanix DR policies.

Option A (Self-Service Restore) is incorrect:

Self-Service Restore is used forend-user recovery of deleted files, not for network settings.

Option C (nncli tool) is incorrect:

Thenncli toolis used fornetwork troubleshooting, but it does not automatically restore DNS settings.

Option D (Configure a Protection Domain) is incorrect:

Protection Domains definereplication policies, but they do not fix DNS settings after failover.

When a node is placed intoMaintenance Mode, Nutanix follows a structured process to ensureservice continuity and data integrity.

Option B (All eligible VMs on the host are migrated to other hosts) is correct:

Live Migration automatically moves VMs to other hoststo avoid downtime.

This ensures workloads remain operational during maintenance.

Option D (Non-migratable VMs are powered off) is correct:

Some VMs, such as those usingGPU pass-through or local storage dependencies,cannot be live-migrated.

These VMsmust be powered offbefore placing the host into Maintenance Mode.

Option A is incorrect:

Non-migratable VMs are not automatically restarted on other hosts—they remain powered off until manually restarted.

Option C is incorrect:

Eligible VMs are live-migrated, not powered off.

Storage Policies in Nutanix allow administrators to configuredata protection and performance settingsat thestorage container level.

Replication Factor (RF)definesthe number of copies of datastored across nodes for fault tolerance.

Encryptionensures thatdata at rest is protectedvia Nutanix-native encryption methods.

Option A (Storage Containers and Volume Groups)refers tostorage organization, not policies.

Option C (Shares and Object Stores)applies tofile and object storage services, not VM storage policies.

Option D (Data Protection and Security)is a broad term but does not definespecific policy attributes.

InNutanix Capacity Planning,Overall Runwayrepresents how long the cluster can support current and new workloads before resources are exhausted.

Even if the runway is below 365 days, the system considers the cluster to be in good shape if new workloads are sustainable (Option B).

Option A is incorrect: Storage runway alone is not the only factor; CPU and memory are equally important.

Option C is incorrect: The presence of recommended resources does not mean the cluster is in good shape.

Option D is incorrect: The target of 1 month affects projections but does not explain why the cluster is in good shape.

When synchronous replication fails immediately between two clusters, it is often due to blocked communication across the required ports (2009 and 2020). These must be open manually if the clusters are in different subnets or if network policies block traffic.

From theNutanix Enterprise Cloud Administration (ECA)course materials:

“Replication communication relies on specific ports, which must be allowed through the firewall. If the clusters are in different subnets or if there are external firewalls, these ports must be explicitly opened.”

“The modify_firewall command is used to open or close ports on cluster nodes. For replication and remote site communication, eth1 is typically used for external replication traffic.”

Since eth1 is typically used for external connectivity and replication traffic, opening ports on this interface using modify_firewall resolves the communication block.

In a dark site deployment, LCM does not automatically fetch updates from the internet. The administrator must manually upload compatibility bundles.

Option B (The latest compatibility bundle has not been uploaded) is correct:

Thecompatibility bundlecontainsfirmware mappings, allowing LCM to detect the correct BIOS version.

Option A is incorrect:

AOSdoes not need to be upgraded firstfor a BIOS update.

Option C is incorrect:

TheBMC firmware does not always need updatingbefore BIOS updates.

Option D is incorrect:

In a dark site deployment,LCM does not rely on an internet connection, so webserver access is not required.

The Nutanix ECA course addresses Metro Availability, a high-availability feature that provides synchronous replication between two Nutanix clusters for zero Recovery Point Objective (RPO) and near-zero Recovery Time Objective (RTO). The NCC warning about thebreak_replication_timeoutbeing below the recommended minimum indicates a configuration issue that could affect the stability of Metro Availability. Thebreak_replication_timeoutparameter determines how long the Protection Domain (PD) waits before breaking replication if connectivity between the Metro clusters is disrupted.

Extract from Nutanix Enterprise Cloud Administration (ECA) Course Documents:

Module: Data Protection, Section: Metro Availability Configuration"Metro Availability uses synchronous replication to ensure data consistency between two clusters. The break_replication_timeout parameter defines the timeout period for replication. The recommended minimum value is 15 seconds to prevent premature replication breaks due to transient network issues."

Module: Nutanix Cluster Check (NCC), Section: Metro Availability Alerts"An NCC warning indicating that the break_replication_timeout for a Metro Protection Domain is below the recommended minimum suggests the timeout is too low, risking unnecessary replication breaks. The recommended setting is 15 seconds to balance stability and responsiveness in Metro Availability setups."

Explanation of Options:

A. Update the break_replication_timeout to 10 secondsThis is incorrect. A timeout of 10 seconds is below the recommended minimum of 15 seconds, as specified in the ECA course. Setting the timeout too low increases the risk of replication breaking due to transient network latency or jitter, which could disrupt Metro Availability and cause unnecessary failovers. The ECA documentation warns:"A break_replication_timeout below 15 seconds may lead to frequent replication breaks, reducing the reliability of Metro Availability."

B. Update the break_replication_timeout to 5 millisecondsThis is incorrect. A timeout of 5 milliseconds is far too low and impractical for Metro Availability, as even minor network delays would trigger replication breaks. The ECA course does not support millisecond-level timeouts and explicitly recommends 15 seconds as the minimum. Such a low value would destabilize the Metro setup, as noted:"Extremely low timeout values are not supported, as they cause replication to break under normal network conditions."

C. Update the break_replication_timeout to 15 millisecondsThis is incorrect. A timeout of 15 milliseconds is still significantly below the recommended minimum of 15 seconds. Similar to option B, this setting would cause replication to break too quickly, undermining the purpose of Metro Availability. The ECA course clarifies:"Timeouts in milliseconds are not recommended for Metro Availability, as they do not account for typical network latency in synchronous replication setups."

D. Update the break_replication_timeout to 15 secondsThis is the correct answer. The ECA course explicitly recommends abreak_replication_timeoutof 15 seconds as the minimum to ensure Metro Availability remains stable. This value allows the system to tolerate transient network issues without prematurely breaking replication, maintaining data consistency and availability. The NCC warning indicates the current timeout is below this threshold, and updating it to 15 seconds resolves the issue.

Supporting Extract:"To resolve NCC warnings about break_replication_timeout, set the value to 15 seconds using the ncli command: ncli pd update-metro-avail-pd name= break_replication_timeout=15. This ensures compliance with Nutanix best practices."

Additional Context from ECA:

Metro Availability Overview: Metro Availability synchronously replicates data between two clusters, typically within 100 km, to achieve zero RPO. Thebreak_replication_timeoutis a critical parameter that balances responsiveness to network issues with the need to avoid unnecessary replication breaks. The ECA course notes:"A timeout of 15 seconds is the default and recommended value to handle typical network fluctuations in Metro setups."

NCC Warning Resolution: The NCC (Nutanix Cluster Check) monitors cluster health and flags configurations that deviate from best practices. The warning aboutbreak_replication_timeoutindicates a risk to Metro Availability stability, and setting it to 15 seconds aligns with Nutanix recommendations.

Supporting Reference from Web Results:

The Nutanix Support Portal confirms the ECA guidance: "For Metro Availability, the break_replication_timeout should be set to a minimum of 15 seconds to prevent replication breaks due to transient network issues, as flagged by NCC warnings."

The Nutanix ECA course covers various methods for organizing and managing virtual machines (VMs) within a Nutanix environment, particularly in Prism Central. The question focuses on easily grouping a set of VMs, which requires a mechanism that is flexible, scalable, and straightforward to apply across multiple VMs for management, reporting, or policy application.

Extract from Nutanix Enterprise Cloud Administration (ECA) Course Documents:

Module: Prism Central Management, Section: Entity Organization"Tags provide a flexible way to group entities such as VMs in Prism Central. Tags are key-value pairs that can be assigned to VMs to categorize them for management, reporting, or policy enforcement. They are easy to apply and can be used to group VMs dynamically across clusters."

Module: VM Management, Section: Grouping VMs"To group a set of VMs for simplified management, Tags are the recommended approach. Unlike Categories, which are used for role-based access control and policy enforcement, Tags are lightweight and ideal for custom grouping without additional configuration overhead."

Explanation of Options:

A. Catalog ItemsThis is incorrect. Catalog Items in Nutanix are used within the Nutanix Calm or Marketplace to manage application blueprints or service offerings, not for grouping VMs. The ECA course states:"Catalog Items represent deployable applications or services in the Marketplace, not a mechanism for grouping existing VMs."They are unrelated to VM organization.

B. LabelsThis is incorrect. The term "Labels" is not used in Nutanix ECA documentation for grouping VMs. While Labels may be a generic term in other platforms, Nutanix uses "Tags" or "Categories" for similar purposes. The ECA materials do not reference Labels as a feature in Prism Central or Prism Element for VM grouping.

C. ProjectsThis is incorrect. Projects in Nutanix Prism Central are used to manage resources, users, and policies for a group of workloads, typically for multi-tenancy or resource allocation. While VMs can be associated with Projects, this involves additional configuration (e.g., assigning users, quotas, and policies) and is not the easiest way to group VMs. The ECA course notes:"Projects are used for resource governance and multi-tenancy, requiring additional setup compared to Tags for simple VM grouping."

D. TagsThis is the correct answer. Tags are lightweight, user-defined key-value pairs that can be applied to VMs in Prism Central to group them for management, monitoring, or reporting purposes. The ECA course emphasizes that Tags are easy to assign and manage, making them ideal for grouping VMs without the overhead of other mechanisms like Categories or Projects. Tags can be applied to multiple VMs at once and used in searches, dashboards, or scripts.

Supporting Extract:"Tags allow administrators to quickly group VMs by assigning custom key-value pairs, such as ‘Department: HR’ or ‘Environment: Production.’ They are ideal for ad-hoc grouping and can be leveraged in Prism Central for filtering and management tasks."

Additional Context from ECA:

Tags are managed in Prism Central under theEntities > Tagssection, where administrators can create, assign, and manage Tags for VMs and other entities. The ECA course highlights their simplicity:"Tags require minimal configuration and can be applied to VMs in bulk, making them the easiest method for grouping."

Unlike Categories, which are used for policy enforcement (e.g., security or placement policies), Tags are purely for organizational purposes, aligning with the question’s focus on ease of use.

Supporting Reference from Web Results:

The Nutanix Bible aligns with the ECA documentation: "Tags in Prism Central provide a simple and flexible way to organize VMs and other entities, enabling administrators to group resources for management or reporting without complex configurations."

Application discovery in Prism Central requires sufficient Prism Central resources and an active internet connection to retrieve application signatures.

Option A (Sufficient Prism Central VM resources) is correct:

Prism Central needsadequate CPU and memoryto process application signatures and discovery data.

Option B (Internet connection) is correct:

Application discovery depends on Nutanix’scloud databaseto recognize application patterns.

Option C (API key and key ID) is incorrect:

API keys are not requiredfor automatic application discovery.

Option D (Network controller enabled) is incorrect:

Application discoverydoes not depend on a network controller feature.

For Disaster Recovery to function correctly, the source and destination storage containers must have identical names.

Option C (Storage container name mismatch) is correct:

If thestorage container name at the DR site does not match, Nutanix cannot mapsnapshots and replication data.

This causesfailover operations to fail, even though data exists.

Option A (NGT not installed) is incorrect:

NGT is needed for application-consistent snapshots, butnot required for crash-consistent snapshots.

Option B (Windows updates) is incorrect:

OS updates do not affect replication availability.

Option D (Storage RF factor mismatch) is incorrect:

Replication works across different RF factors, but performance may vary.

Categories in Nutanix are used to group resources and require only a name and a value for definition.

Option A (A name and a value) is correct:

Categoriesrequire a name (e.g., "Production VMs")and a value (e.g., "Tier 1").

These are then applied to VMs, storage, and other resources forpolicy-based management.

Option B (Policy and Entity) is incorrect:

Policiesuse categories but are not required to define a category.

Option C (Service and Scope) is incorrect:

Categoriesdo not require servicesor a defined scope.

Option D (Catalog and Template) is incorrect:

These apply toself-service provisioning, not categories.

Reserved Capacity settings define how much storage is exclusively allocated for a specific container.

Option B (Reserved Capacity is too high) is correct:

If too much space is reserved for a container, it can report "out of space" while the cluster still has free capacity.

Options A, C, and D are incorrect:

Advertised Capacity, Compression, and RF settings do not directly cause storage exhaustion unless misconfigured with Reserved Capacity.

When synchronous replication has been configured and a planned failover is required for datacenter maintenance, Nutanix recommends performing aplanned failoverto ensure data consistency and a clean transition of services.

From theNutanix Enterprise Cloud Administration (ECA)course materials:

“A planned failover ensures that data replication is complete and consistent between the primary and standby sites before the workload is migrated. This prevents data loss and ensures seamless recovery.”

Additionally:

“A planned failover can be initiated either from the primary site or from the standby site. This provides flexibility depending on operational preferences and site availability during maintenance windows.”

“Unplanned failovers should only be used in the event of unexpected site outages or catastrophic failures, as they may involve data loss or incomplete synchronization.”

Therefore, the correct approaches are to conduct a planned failover either from the standby site (B) or from the primary site (D). This ensures seamless workload transition during the datacenter maintenance event.

Understanding the Exhibit & Memory Allocation

Thehost has 128GB of physical RAM.

Thecurrent memory allocationacrossthree VMs (VM1, VM2, VM3) is 128GB, but only92GB is actually utilized.

This means there is36GB of unutilized memory available for allocation.

Step-by-Step Breakdown

Existing Memory Usage Before Adding VM4

Total Physical RAM:128GB

Used by running VMs (VM1, VM2, VM3):92GB

Unutilized Memory Available:36GB

After Creating and Running VM4

VM4 is allocatedmemory but only utilizes 28GB.

The table does not show VM4’s allocated RAM, but assuming it was given a reasonable allocation, it must have been taken from the36GB unutilized memory pool.

IfVM4 uses 28GB, theremaining unutilized memory is now (36GB - 28GB) = 8GB.

Maximum Memory Allocation for VM5

Sinceonly 8GB remains unutilized, the maximum memory VM5 can be allocated while still allowing it to power on is8GB.

Evaluating the Answer Choices

(A) 4GB❌(Incorrect)

More memory (8GB) is available, so limiting to 4GB is unnecessary.

(B) 8GB✅(Correct)

Theremaining unutilized memory after VM4 is 8GB, so VM5 can be allocated up to8GBwhile ensuring it can power on.

(C) 16GB❌(Incorrect)

Only8GB is left, so 16GB isnot possible.

(D) 32GB❌(Incorrect)

There isnot enough unutilized memoryto allocate 32GB.

Key Concept: Nutanix Memory Overcommit

Nutanix AHV supportsmemory overcommit, meaning VMs can be allocated more memory than physically available usingmemory ballooning and swapping.

However,to power on VM5 without impacting performance, it must fit within the available unutilized memory, which is8GB.

In a 12-node FT2 cluster, onlyonenode can be placed into maintenance mode at a time. This ensures that the cluster maintains data redundancy and protection (FT2 indicates 2-failure tolerance).

From theNutanix Enterprise Cloud Administration (ECA)course materials:

“For FT2 clusters, a maximum of one node can be placed in maintenance mode at a time to ensure the cluster’s ability to tolerate failures and maintain quorum.”

VMs using GPU pass-through cannot be live-migrated because they are directly tied to a physical GPU on a specific host.

Option B (VMs use GPU pass-through) is correct:

Pass-through devices (such as GPUs) are directly assigned to VMs, makingmigration impossibleunless the VM is powered off first.

Option A (VMs use a Volume Group) is incorrect:

Volume Groupssupport live migrationunless they are configured incorrectly.

Option C (VM-VM anti-affinity) is incorrect:

Anti-affinity rules prevent two specific VMs from running together, but do not prevent migration.

Option D (VMs use external NAS) is incorrect:

Using NAS does not block VM migration, as Nutanixsupports shared storage across hosts.

In a Nutanix cluster, Replication Factor 2 (RF2) means that each piece of data has two copies: a primary and a replica. To safely remove a node while ensuring data redundancy and cluster health, the system must have enough nodes to maintain the RF2 protection and complete the removal.

From the Nutanix Enterprise Cloud Administration (ECA) documentation:

“The minimum number of nodes required for a safe host removal in an RF2 cluster is four. This ensures that even after removing a node, there are enough remaining nodes to continue hosting the primary and replica data copies, meeting the RF2 requirement.”

The logic is:

In a 3-node RF2 cluster, there isn’t enough redundancy to safely remove a node without impacting data availability.

A 4-node RF2 cluster allows safe removal of one node while still ensuring two copies of all data remain.

Thus, the minimum number of nodes required for a safe host removal in an RF2 cluster is 4