Free and Premium HP HPE7-J01 Dumps Questions Answers

The requirements provided point toward a "Secondary Storage" use case where the data must be more than just a "cold" backup; it needs to be "active" for DevOps and testing. The HPE Alletra 5000 (the successor to the HPE Nimble Storage Adaptive Flash arrays) is specifically engineered for this hybrid role.

Architecturally, the Alletra 5000 utilizes the CASL (Content Aware Storage Architecture) file system. This allows it to perform high-speed inline deduplication and compression, making it a cost-effective repository for long-term retention. Crucially for the customer's DevOps requirement, Alletra 5000 supports Zero-Copy Clones. This means the storage administrator can instantly create multiple copies of production datasets for development and testing without consuming additional storage space or impacting the performance of the primary backup repository.

When paired with Veeam Backup & Replication, the solution meets the "fast granular restore" and "instant recovery" requirements perfectly. Veeam’s vPower technology enables Instant VM Recovery, which allows a virtual machine to be started directly from the compressed and deduplicated backup file on the Alletra 5000. Because the Alletra 5000 includes a flash tier for metadata and frequently accessed data, it provides the necessary IOPS to run these recovered VMs or DevTest workloads with near-production performance.

In contrast, while Cohesity (Option B) is a strong secondary platform, HPE dHCI is a primary infrastructure solution and not just a backup repository. Scality RING (Option C) is an object storage solution geared toward massive scale and petabyte-level archives, but it lacks the performance characteristics for "instant recovery" and seamless DevOps cloning found in the Alletra 5000. HPE Alletra 4000 (Option D) is a high-density data server (formerly Apollo) which provides the raw hardware but lacks the integrated CASL-based intelligence and "Better Together" orchestration that the Alletra 5000/Veeam partnership offers for this specific customer profile.

In a Zerto environment, a Virtual Protection Group (VPG) is the fundamental unit of management used to group virtual machines that must be replicated together to maintain write-order fidelity and application consistency. This is particularly vital for multi-tier applications, such as a database server and a web server, that need to be recovered to the exact same point in time.

According to the HPE Advanced Storage Solutions technical guides and Zerto's architectural specifications, a single Virtual Machine (VM) can be associated with a maximum of three VPGs simultaneously. This capability is often referred to as "one-to-many" replication. This architectural flexibility allows a storage administrator to design complex data protection strategies that go beyond simple site-to-site disaster recovery. For example, a VM could be part of:

A Local VPG for high-speed recovery from the local journal (Short-term retention).

A Remote VPG for disaster recovery to a secondary data center or public cloud.

A Tertiary VPG for long-term retention or to a third site for regional disaster protection.

When a VM is protected in multiple VPGs, each VPG maintains its own independent journal, settings, and Recovery Point Objective (RPO) targets. However, the Virtual Replication Appliance (VRA) on the host only needs to read the data changes (IOs) from the hypervisor once; it then distributes those changes to all the target VRAs associated with the various VPGs. This ensures that while the VM is highly protected across multiple locations, the overhead on the production host and the hypervisor remains minimal. It is important to note that while three is the maximum, the storage architect must ensure that the available network bandwidth and the IOPS of the target storage systems can handle the aggregate replication load of all associated VPGs.

Performance Estimation

The HPE Ninja Sizer is a vital tool for storage architects to model the "Performance vs. Capacity" trade-offs of the HPE Alletra MP B10000 disaggregated architecture. In this scenario, the current configuration (as shown in the exhibit) consists of 4 nodes and 1 JBOF (with 8 drives of 15.36TB each).

To address poor read/write performance in Ninja Sizer, the partner must analyze the Performance Estimation pane. By clicking the chart/graph icon in the bottom right of the summary dashboard, the tool opens a detailed breakdown of the IOPS, throughput, and latency limits for the selected hardware. In a disaggregated shared-everything (DASE) architecture like the Alletra MP, performance is a direct function of the "node-to-drive" ratio. A configuration with only 8 drives (as seen in image_6491d0.png) may be "disk-bound," meaning the controllers have more compute power than the backend drive count can support in parallel.

By accessing the performance details, the partner can see if the bottleneck is at the node level (CPU/Cores) or the drive level (Flash bandwidth). To "correct this issue" and optimize the sizing, the partner would typically need to increase the drive count within the JBOF to allow for more parallel I/O streams or add additional JBOFs to scale the backend bandwidth. The Ninja Sizer provides real-time feedback; as the partner adds more 15.36TB drives, they will see the Performance Estimation bars move from yellow/red toward green, indicating an appropriately balanced solution that meets the customer's latency and throughput SLAs.

The customer's requirements specify a need for a fully managed environment that supports a "multi-gen" IT stack, including virtual machines (VMs), containers, and bare metal servers, all while providing a cloud-like operational experience for DevOps. HPE Private Cloud Enterprise (PCE) is the only solution in the portfolio designed specifically to meet all these criteria in a single, integrated managed service.

HPE Private Cloud Enterprise provides an automated, self-service cloud experience for developers and IT operators. It natively supports the provisioning and lifecycle management of bare metal compute resources, which is a key requirement for the customer’s diverse workload environment. For containers, PCE integrates with standard Kubernetes orchestration, and for virtual machines, it supports multiple hypervisors including VMware. A critical differentiator is that PCE is delivered as a managed service, meaning HPE handles the underlying infrastructure management (updates, patching, and health), allowing the customer to focus on application development and DevOps productivity.

Options A and B are focused on specific stacks (VMware Cloud Foundation and Azure Stack HCI, respectively) which do not offer the same native, unified bare-metal management and multi-workload breadth as PCE. HPE Private Cloud Business Edition (Option C) is a self-managed solution intended for smaller-scale VM environments and does not provide the "fully managed" experience or the native bare-metal compute service required by this enterprise customer. PCE’s inclusion of HPE Morpheus Enterprise software further ensures the "DevOps toolchain" integration requirement is met by providing a powerful self-service engine for infrastructure-as-code.

In modern versions of Zerto (specifically starting with Zerto 9.0 and 9.5), the security model for site pairing was significantly enhanced to move away from legacy credential sharing. To establish a secure relationship between two Zerto Virtual Managers (ZVMs), the administrator must utilize a Pairing Token.

Architecturally, the pairing process works as a "push-pull" handshake. The administrator first logs into the Target (Remote) ZVM—the site that will receive the replication—and navigates to the "Sites" tab. There, they select the option to "Generate Pairing Token." This token is a unique, time-sensitive alphanumeric string that acts as a one-time password for the pairing attempt. Once generated, the administrator copies this token and logs into the Source (Local) ZVM. During the "Pair" wizard, they specify the IP address or FQDN of the remote ZVM and paste the pairing token.

According to the HPE Advanced Storage Solutions implementation guides, this token replaces the need for the source site to know the administrative credentials of the remote vCenter or ZVM, thereby adhering to the principle of least privilege. The token typically has a default expiration (e.g., 48 hours) or expires immediately after a successful pairing session. This ensures that even if a token is intercepted, its window of utility is minimal. Options A and B are incorrect as they represent legacy or non-standard methods; while vCenter credentials are required for the initial installation and registration of the ZVM, they are not the mechanism used for the pairing handshake itself. Option D is incorrect as Zerto manages the underlying encryption keys automatically once the pairing is authenticated via the Pairing Token.

HPE Morpheus Enterprise is a comprehensive multi-cloud management and orchestration platform that enables self-service provisioning and lifecycle management across private and public clouds. To accurately size and quote a Morpheus solution in tools like HPE Online Config Advanced (OCA), the primary licensing metric is the Workload Element (WLE), also frequently referred to as a Workload Element (WE) in some documentation.

A Workload Element is defined as a granular unit of compute directly associated with an application service that is being managed or inventoried by Morpheus. This includes:

Virtual Machines (VMs) on-premises (e.g., VMware vCenter, Hyper-V).

Instances in the public cloud (e.g., AWS EC2, Azure VMs, Google Cloud instances).

Bare metal servers if they are provisioned to run application services.

Container deployments (such as Kubernetes pods).

Importantly, Morpheus does not count supporting infrastructure like storage arrays, load balancers, or physical hypervisor hosts (e.g., the physical server running ESXi) as Workload Elements. Licensing is typically based on a concurrent model, meaning the customer must license the total number of WLEs under management at any given time, regardless of whether they are located on-prem or in a public cloud. Therefore, the partner must calculate the aggregate sum of all VMs and cloud instances the customer intends to manage to ensure the license quantity in OCA is correct.

The customer's requirements focus on a single data management platform that can unify disparate backup tasks and eliminate data silos across files, objects, and archiving while supporting massive scale-out NAS. The HPE Solutions with Cohesity (specifically Cohesity DataProtect and Cohesity SmartFiles) are architecturally designed to meet these specific needs.

Unlike traditional backup software that often relies on separate components for different data types, Cohesity provides a unique shared-nothing, scale-out architecture that consolidates secondary data onto a single platform. It natively supports a vast array of workloads including virtual machines, containers (Kubernetes), databases (SQL, Oracle, NoSQL), and physical servers. A core differentiator for Cohesity is its ability to act as a Scale-Out NAS via its SmartFiles feature, allowing it to manage PB-scale unstructured data without the performance bottlenecks found in traditional "siloed" storage.

When delivered via HPE GreenLake Flex, this solution is typically paired with HPE Alletra 4000 storage servers (such as the Alletra 4120 or 4140). These servers are density-optimized, storage-centric systems that provide the high-throughput and massive internal capacity required for a modern secondary storage environment. While Commvault (Option A) and Veeam (Option D) are powerful data protection suites, they are often used in conjunction with external target storage (like StoreOnce or Alletra MP) and do not always provide the same level of native, unified scale-out NAS and data silo elimination within a single management plane as the integrated Cohesity/Alletra 4000 stack.

Configure

In a VMware vSphere environment, integrating HPE Alletra storage typically involves the installation of the HPE Storage Peer Motion Utility or the HPE Storage Connection Manager for VMware, which provides the VASA (vSphere APIs for Storage Awareness) provider functionality. This integration allows vCenter to manage storage arrays directly for tasks such as provisioning Virtual Volumes (vVols) and monitoring storage health.

According to the HPE Alletra Integration Guide for VMware, after the plug-in or provider is registered with vCenter, an administrator can verify its status through the vSphere Client UI. As shown in the exhibit (image_64a7b7.png), the administrator is currently viewing the Storage Providers section under the Configure tab of the vCenter object. This specific view is the correct location to verify that the HPE VASA provider is active and communicating. The list under "Storage Provider/Storage System" should show the Alletra array's URL and a status of "Active" or "Online."

If the administrator wants to verify the registration of the UI-based plug-in itself (which adds specific HPE menus and dashboards), they should click the three dots (...) at the end of the navigation bar. This reveals additional hidden tabs where specialized vendor extensions, such as the HPE Storage dashboard, are located. Successful installation is confirmed if the HPE-specific provider is listed with a valid certificate and the "Last Rescan" time is current. Failure to see the provider in this list indicates that the registration process (typically performed via the array's management console or a separate appliance) was not completed successfully, which would prevent the use of advanced features like Storage Policy Based Management (SPBM).

To provide automated orchestration and business continuity for VMware virtual machines in a disaster recovery scenario, the industry-standard solution integrated with HPE storage is VMware Live Site Recovery (formerly known as VMware Site Recovery Manager or SRM).

When a customer utilizes Asynchronous Remote Copy on HPE Alletra 9000 arrays, the storage layer handles the data replication between the production and recovery sites. However, the storage array alone cannot automate the re-registration of virtual machines, the mapping of network port groups, or the specific power-on sequencing required for complex applications at the secondary site. VMware Live Site Recovery serves as the orchestration engine that bridges this gap. It works in conjunction with a Storage Replication Adapter (SRA) provided by HPE. The HPE SRA allows the VMware software to communicate directly with the Alletra 9000 arrays to initiate tasks such as promoting recovery volumes to a read-write state, taking temporary snapshots for DR testing, and automating the "failover" and "failback" workflows.

As shown in the exhibit (image_6601ef.jpg), a complete solution requires an SRM appliance and a vCenter appliance at both the production and recovery sites. This architecture ensures that even if the primary site is completely lost, the recovery site has all the necessary metadata and orchestration instructions to bring the business-critical VMs online with minimal manual intervention. Option A (Lifecycle Management) is for patching and updates, Option D (Storage DRS) is for load balancing within a cluster, and Option C refers to operational monitoring rather than disaster recovery orchestration. For a customer already invested in Alletra 9000 Remote Copy, VMware Live Site Recovery is the "Better Together" choice for achieving low Recovery Time Objectives (RTO).

When competing against IBM FlashSystem, HPE's primary differentiators lie in the intelligence of the management platform and the integration into the broader hybrid cloud ecosystem.

The first major advantage is AIOps for infrastructure, pioneered by HPE InfoSight. While IBM has Storage Insights, HPE InfoSight is widely considered the industry benchmark for deep-stack predictive analytics. It uses machine learning to analyze millions of sensor points across the global install base to predict and prevent up to 86% of problems before they occur. This goes beyond simple storage monitoring; it provides visibility into the "noisy neighbor" VMs and host-side issues that impact storage performance, providing a level of autonomous management that IBM's portfolio currently lacks.

The second advantage is Full stack automation with hybrid cloud. By managing the Alletra 9000 through the HPE GreenLake Data Services Cloud Console (DSCC), the customer transitions from managing a "box" to a cloud-native operational model. This provides a unified API and a consistent management experience whether the data is on-premises or in the cloud. DSCC enables "Intent-Based Provisioning," where the user simply specifies the workload type and the cloud console automatically selects the best-suited array and volume parameters, ensuring optimal performance without manual tuning. This "Cloud Ops" model is a cornerstone of the HPE GreenLake strategy, offering a more streamlined, automated experience than the traditional management software typically associated with the IBM FlashSystem line. While IBM does offer ransomware features (Option C), HPE's focus on AIOps and hybrid cloud integration provides a more transformative operational benefit for most enterprise customers.

The HPE B-Series SN7000B is a high-performance Director based on Brocade Gen 7 (G7) technology. Buffer-to-Buffer (BB) credits are the fundamental flow-control mechanism used in Fibre Channel to prevent frame loss and manage congestion.

Statement D is a foundational principle of SAN architecture: BB credits are based on link speed and frame size. In an FC fabric, the number of credits required to "fill the pipe" (keep data moving without waiting for acknowledgments) is a direct function of the Round Trip Time (RTT), which is determined by the physical distance, the speed of the link (e.g., 64Gb/s vs 32Gb/s), and the size of the frames being sent (typically 2KB). As link speeds increase, more buffer credits are required to maintain full throughput over the same distance.

Statement C reflects a specific technical default in the Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) for Gen 7 hardware. To ensure that ports can initialize and handle basic traffic immediately upon being enabled, the switch reserves a default number of credits from the ASIC's global buffer pool. For user ports on these high-density blades, the system reserves eight buffer credits per port, regardless of whether the port is currently online or offline. This reservation ensures that the port has the minimum resources necessary to complete a fabric login (FLOGI) or negotiate a link without competing for pool resources.

Option E is incorrect because the entire pool is not reserved; a significant portion of the ASIC's buffers remains in a "shared pool" that can be dynamically allocated for long-distance links or high-demand ports via the "Extended Fabrics" feature. Option B is incorrect as it confuses the TCP windowing concept with FC credit-based flow control. Option A is incorrect because BB credits are a local port-to-port negotiation (link-level) and do not need a fabric-wide global "agreement" to form the fabric.

HPE GreenLake for File Storage is built upon a disaggregated, shared-everything (DASE) architecture powered by VAST Data software. The replication mechanism in this environment is fundamentally different from traditional block-based replication. Instead of replicating entire volumes or LUNs, HPE GreenLake for File Storage performs replication at the directory level.

According to the HPE GreenLake for File Storage Administrator Guide, the system utilizes a snapshot-based asynchronous replication engine. This allows for highly flexible topologies, including N:1 (fan-in) and 1:N (fan-out) configurations, which are essential for modern distributed data environments and centralized backup strategies. Because the solution is file-based, it leverages "Views" (or shares) that point to specific directory paths. Protection policies and snapshot schedules are applied directly to these paths, ensuring that only the specific datasets required for disaster recovery are replicated.

Option B is a common point of confusion; while the system is inherently "reduction-aware" and uses similarity-based data reduction (deduplication and compression) to save space on the physical media, the replication process itself focuses on the metadata and unique data blocks associated with the directory-level snapshots. Option A is incorrect because, in an asynchronous replication relationship, the destination is typically Read-Only until a failover or clone operation is initiated. Option D is incorrect as the management of protected paths follows strict pairing rules to prevent configuration conflicts. Thus, the support for flexible fan-in/fan-out topologies and granular directory-level protection (Option C) is the defining characteristic of this enterprise file solution.

The HPE Alletra MP X10000 is an object and file storage solution utilizing a Disaggregated Shared-Everything (DASE) architecture. A key differentiator of this disaggregated design is the stateless nature of the controller nodes and the centralized management of the data plane.

When a cluster expansion occurs—such as adding a new controller node or an additional JBOF (Just a Bunch of Flash) storage shelf—the system is designed to automatically optimize the workload distribution. According to the HPE Alletra MP Architectural Guide, adding an additional JBOF or drives triggers an automatic rebalancing of the data stripes. Unlike older architectures where manual rebalancing services were required (such as in the 3PAR/B10000 block lineage), the X10000 uses a sophisticated hashing mechanism.

Specifically, data is distributed across DSPs (Data Storage Processors) which are virtualized management units. Upon the addition of hardware, these DSPs are rebalanced across the available compute and storage resources in a matter of seconds. Because the nodes are stateless and state is persisted only within the JBOFs, this rebalancing happens with minimal performance impact and no need for the massive "data movement" traditionally associated with expanding a RAID group. This ensures that as a customer scales from the minimum of 3 nodes up to 8 or more, the system always maintains an optimal load balance and utilizes all available flash bandwidth and compute cycles in parallel.

The HPE Solutions for Qumulo are a result of a strategic partnership designed to provide a high-performance, scale-out NAS (Network Attached Storage) platform for unstructured data. According to the HPE Solutions with Qumulo Reference Architecture, the primary hardware platform utilized for these factory-built, integrated solutions is the HPE Apollo 4000 series, specifically the HPE Apollo 4200.

The Apollo 4200 is chosen for this role because it is a density-optimized, storage-centric server that provides an ideal balance of compute and massive internal storage capacity within a standard 2U rack footprint. Architecturally, the Apollo 4200 supports an "SSD-first" hybrid configuration or an all-flash configuration, which aligns perfectly with Qumulo's file system requirements. Qumulo’s software uses the SSDs for a high-speed metadata layer and write-cache, while utilizing high-capacity HDDs for the data plane, ensuring that even with billions of files, the system maintains near-flash performance.

While the HPE ProLiant DL325 is also used for specific all-NVMe nodes in the Qumulo portfolio, the Apollo 4200 remains the foundational building block for the hybrid and archive nodes that comprise the bulk of enterprise deployments. The HPE Apollo 4500 (Option D) is a 4U system that, while part of the Apollo family, is not the standard integrated platform for the mainstream Qumulo joint offering. The HPE Alletra 5000 (Option B) is a block-storage-focused platform derived from the Nimble lineage, and the ProLiant DL360 (Option C) is a general-purpose 1U compute server that lacks the internal drive density required for a high-capacity scale-out file storage solution. By selecting the Apollo 4200, customers benefit from a pre-validated, factory-integrated solution that simplifies the deployment of massive file lakes for workloads like video surveillance, medical imaging, and big data analytics.

The HPE Quorum Witness (QW) is a critical component for facilitating Automatic Transparent Failover (ATF) in Peer Persistence, Active Peer Persistence, and Active Sync Replication configurations. Its primary architectural purpose is to act as an independent "tie-breaker" during a split-brain scenario—a situation where the storage arrays lose their heartbeat/replication links and both attempt to claim primary ownership of the volumes.

According to HPE documentation, the Quorum Witness must be installed at a third, neutral site that is geographically separate and failure-independent from the sites hosting the primary and secondary arrays. This "Third Site" placement ensures that if either site hosting an array experiences a total power or network failure, the remaining array can still reach the Quorum Witness via the network to obtain a "quorum vote" and safely assume the primary role without manual intervention. If the QW were placed at the same site as one of the arrays, a failure at that site would take down both the storage and the witness, preventing the surviving array at the other site from achieving quorum for an automatic failover.

Connectivity to the Quorum Witness is strictly over IP (Ethernet); it does not require Fibre Channel (FC) connectivity. While Option B suggests a limitation to specific Linux VMs, the QW is a self-contained application that can be installed on either physical or virtual machines running a variety of supported Linux host OS versions listed in the HPE SPOCK matrix (including RHEL, SUSE, and CentOS). Option A is slightly imprecise because the arrays themselves initiate the failover logic after querying the QW, rather than the QW "initiating" it autonomously. Therefore, the recommendation for third-site placement remains the most essential architectural requirement.

The HPE Alletra 4000 series (specifically the Alletra 4110 and 4120) are technically classified as Storage Servers. Unlike traditional "closed" storage arrays like the Alletra 6000 or 9000, the Alletra 4000s are open platforms derived from the HPE Apollo lineage, designed to run Software-Defined Storage (SDS) stacks such as HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric, Scality, or Qumulo.

Because these systems are fundamentally high-density servers, their lifecycle management—including firmware updates (BIOS, iLO, controllers), health monitoring, and remote configuration—is integrated into the HPE GreenLake for Compute Ops Management (COM) service. COM provides a cloud-native console designed specifically for server administrators to manage fleets of ProLiant and Alletra 4000 servers from a single pane of glass.

While the customer is building a storage solution, the Data Ops Manager (DOM) (Option D) is the control plane for HPE’s specialized block and file arrays (managed via DSCC) and is not the tool used for raw storage server hardware management. Similarly, the "File Storage" and "Block Storage" tiles in GreenLake refer to specific Storage-as-a-Service (STaaS) offerings rather than the underlying hardware management for SDS building blocks. For a partner designing an Ezmeral solution on Alletra 4000, Compute Ops Management is the correct tool to ensure the hardware stays compliant with the latest HPE Service Pack for ProLiant (SPP) and firmware baselines required for stable SDS operations.

HPE Peer Persistence for the Alletra 6000 (and Nimble) provides synchronous replication and automatic transparent failover (ATF) using the Automatic Switchover (ASO) feature. This process is governed by a Quorum Witness that monitors the health of both arrays in a group.

A fundamental design principle of HPE high-availability storage is to prevent "flapping"—a condition where a workload repeatedly bounces between two sites due to an unstable connection. Consequently, the ASO process is designed to be unidirectional and sticky. When a primary site failure occurs and the Quorum Witness authorizes an automatic switchover, the secondary array becomes the "Upstream" (active) array and begins serving I/O. Once the original primary site is restored and the replication link is re-established, the arrays will automatically begin a resynchronization to ensure data consistency. However, even after the data is fully synced, the system will not automatically move the workload back to the original array. The administrator must perform a manual handover to return the volume collection to its preferred primary site.

Regarding the other options:

Option B: If the witness is unreachable, ASO is automatically disabled to prevent a "split-brain" scenario where both arrays might try to become active simultaneously.

Option C: A single controller failure within an Alletra 6000 does not trigger an ASO. Instead, the array performs an internal controller failover (ALUA) which is transparent to the Peer Persistence relationship.

Option D: In a synchronous relationship, if the target becomes unavailable, the source array typically transitions to an "Out of Sync" state but continues to serve host I/O in order to maintain application availability, rather than rejecting it.

HPE Cloud Bank Storage is an extension of HPE StoreOnce Catalyst that enables the movement of deduplicated data to public, private, or hybrid cloud object storage. The Cloud Bank Detach feature is a critical lifecycle management capability designed for long-term retention and disaster recovery scenarios.

According to the HPE StoreOnce User Guide, the "Detach" operation is a specific administrative action that essentially "unplugs" the Catalyst store from the local StoreOnce appliance while leaving the data intact in the cloud bucket (e.g., AWS S3 or Azure Blob). For an administrator to initiate the detach process, the Cloud Bank store must currently be in a Read-Write (RW) state on the StoreOnce system. If a store is currently connected as Read-Only (often the case after a disaster recovery sync), it cannot be detached until it is promoted or was originally connected in a Read-Write capacity.

Once the detach operation is executed using the required Detach Capacity LTU (License to Use), the store enters a "Detached" state. In this state, the data in the cloud becomes immutable and the store is removed from the local StoreOnce system's active management. It is important to note that once detached, the store can only be reconnected to a StoreOnce system (either the original or a new one for DR) in a Read-Only state for recovery purposes. Statement D is incorrect because you cannot write to a detached store. Statement B is incorrect because one of the primary value propositions of Cloud Bank is portability—allowing you to connect a detached store to a completely different StoreOnce appliance in a different region for recovery. Finally, while HPE Services are available for complex DR planning, they are not a technical requirement for the software-defined reconnection of a detached store.