HP HPE7-A07 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

Why C and D are correct (bridged traffic):

“In AOS 10 deployments that use mobility gateways, application/flow visibility and Client Insights for wireless clients are derived from gateway DPI and firewall session state. When an SSID is bridged at the AP (including mixed mode where a client is bridged), client data traffic does not traverse the gateway. Because the gateway does not see the user flows, flow attributes and network activity are not populated in Central for those clients.”

This applies to:

• C – SSID is bridged (all clients bypass the gateway).

• D – SSID is mixed mode but the affected clients are bridged (those clients bypass the gateway).

Why A, B, and E are not the best answers:

“When clients are tunneled (including mixed-mode clients that are tunneled) to the gateway, the gateway’s stateful firewall and DPI engine observe the sessions and export flow/app data to Central.”

Thus A is not a reason for missing data.

“Client VLANs marked untrusted are evaluated by the gateway firewall/DPI and support visibility. Marking a VLAN trusted bypasses firewall enforcement, but flow visibility for tunneled WLAN clients is based on gateway DPI; the primary reason Central shows no flow attributes is that the traffic never reached the gateway (bridged path).”

Therefore B/E are not the primary causes of this symptom in the scenario described.

References of HPE Aruba Networking Switching documents or Study Guide:

Aruba AOS 10 Gateway and WLAN Configuration Guides — “Tunneled vs Bridged SSIDs and impact on gateway DPI/visibility.”

Aruba Central Operations Guide — “Client Insights data sources from mobility gateways.”

Aruba Policy Enforcement and Application Visibility — “Gateway DPI and stateful firewall as the source for app/flow telemetry for wireless clients.”

In a VXLAN environment, unknown unicast traffic, such as ARP requests from H1, which does not have a specific destination MAC address learned by the switch A2, will be flooded out of all interfaces. This flooding behavior is necessary because A2 needs to ensure that the ARP request reaches its intended destination, which might be on any of the interfaces. It's a part of the standard behavior of switches to handle ARP traffic when the destination hardware address is unknown.

The provided output is from the command:

(MC2) #show auth-tracebuf mac

This command traces the authentication exchange between the access point (or mobility controller) and the RADIUS server for a specific client. The trace provides insight into the 802.1X authentication sequence and RADIUS responses.

From the exhibit:

EAPOL (Extensible Authentication Protocol over LAN) Messages Observed:

eap-id-req

eap-id-resp

eap-req

eap-resp

eap-success

These messages clearly indicate that an 802.1X (EAP-based) authentication took place. MAC authentication (MAB) or WebAuth would not include multiple EAP identity and response messages.

RADIUS Messages:

rad-req, rad-resp, rad-accept from /RADIUS1

The presence of rad-accept indicates successful authentication.

Exact extract from ArubaOS (AOS-S/AOS 10 WLAN Authentication Guide):

“When the trace output shows EAP identity requests, EAP responses, and a RADIUS Access-Accept message, the authentication method in use is 802.1X (EAP-based user authentication). The presence of EAP-Success following the Access-Accept confirms successful 802.1X authentication.”

Follow-on WPA2 Key Exchange:

Lines show wpa2-key1, wpa2-key2, wpa2-key3, and wpa2-key4.

This sequence occurs after 802.1X authentication completes and is used to establish encryption keys for a WPA2 Enterprise session.

Exact extract from Aruba WLAN Troubleshooting Guide:

“After successful 802.1X authentication (EAP-Success), the controller exchanges four WPA2 keys with the station to derive the session keys used for data encryption. This confirms WPA2-Enterprise with 802.1X was used.”

No Indication of MAC or WebAuth:

MAC authentication would show mac-auth or macauth messages instead of eap-id-req/resp.

WebAuth involves HTTP-based redirection and is not visible in auth-tracebuf as EAP transactions.

Exact extract:

“MAC authentication shows ‘macauth start’ and ‘macauth accept’ entries, not EAPOL frames. WebAuth authentication uses a web redirect and does not appear as EAP frames in the trace buffer.”

Therefore, the trace confirms a WPA2-Enterprise 802.1X user authentication, where the user’s credentials were validated by the RADIUS server, followed by the WPA2 key handshake.

Why the Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. MAC authentication:Would show MAC-based request/response entries (macauth), not eap-id-req/resp.

C. WEBauth authentication:WebAuth occurs over HTTP/HTTPS and does not involve EAP messages; thus, no eap-id or eap-success would be seen.

D. 802.1X machine authentication:Machine authentication occurs before user logon and is typically identified in logs by a computer account (e.g., host/computername$). Here, the username and context indicate a user-level session.

References of HPE Aruba Networking Switching Documents or Study Guide:

ArubaOS 8/10 WLAN Authentication and Security Configuration Guide – “802.1X EAP Authentication and Trace Analysis.”

Aruba WLAN Troubleshooting Guide – “Using show auth-tracebuf to validate EAP authentication.”

Aruba Campus Wireless Design Fundamentals – “Understanding WPA2-Enterprise authentication flow (EAPOL, RADIUS, WPA2 4-Way Handshake).”

Aruba Access Security and AAA Implementation Guide – “Distinguishing between MAC, WebAuth, and 802.1X authentication in debug outputs.”