Free and Premium APMG-International ISO-IEC-27001-Foundation Dumps Questions Answers

Clause 6.2 (Information security objectives) requires that objectives:

“be consistent with the information security policy”

“be measurable (if practicable)”

“take into account applicable information security requirements”

“be monitored, communicated, and updated as appropriate.”

From this, option A is correct since consistency with policy is an explicit requirement. Option B is incorrect because the standard allows objectives to be measurable “if practicable” (not mandatory for all). Option C is incorrect—objectives are not transferred contractually to third parties, though third-party agreements may include security requirements. Option D is incorrect because the standard requires regular review “as appropriate,” not a fixed annual cycle.

Thus, the verified requirement isA: They shall be consistent with the information security policy.

Clause 9.3.2 (Management Review Inputs) states that management reviews shall include:

“c) information on the information security performance, including trends in: (1) nonconformities and corrective actions; (2) monitoring and measurement results; (3) audit results; and (4) fulfilment of information security objectives.”

This makesachievement of information security objectives(option A) a required trend to be considered. While external/internal requirements (C) and continual improvement opportunities (D) are also part of management review inputs, they are not specifically listed under “trends in performance.” Option B is outside the direct requirement.

Thus, the verified answer isA.

Clause 6.1.3 (c) requires organizations to:

“compare the controls determined in 6.1.3 b) with those in Annex A and verify that no necessary control has been omitted; and prepare a Statement of Applicability.” It also requires organizations to select risk treatment options considering “the organization’s risk acceptance criteria.”

This shows thatrisk acceptance criteriaare a fundamental factor when selecting risk treatment options. Options C and D are incorrect because Annex A and ISO/IEC 27002 are reference sets, not the sole sources of controls — organizations can design their own. Criteria for performing risk assessments (B) are part of 6.1.2 (risk assessment process), not risk treatment.

Thus, the correct requirement isA: Criteria for accepting identified risks.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract ISO/IEC 27005 standards:

ISO/IEC 27005:2022 is titled:

“Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection — Guidance on managing information security risks.”

This standard provides structured methodologies for identifying, analyzing, evaluating, and treating risks, in alignment with ISO/IEC 27001’s risk management requirements (Clause 6.1.2 and 6.1.3). It supports organizations in implementing the risk management process that underpins an ISMS. Options A and B are titles of other ISO standards (ISO/IEC 27007 for auditing, ISO/IEC 27001 for requirements). Option D refers to ISO/IEC 27002 (controls).

Thus, the correct answer isC: Guidance on managing information security risks.

Clause 6.1.3 (e) specifies:

“The organization shall obtain risk owners’ approval of the information security risk treatment plan and acceptance of the residual information security risks.”

This confirms that residual risks — those remaining after risk treatment — must be reviewed and formally accepted by the designated risk owner. Option A is incorrect; awareness training is not a default control for all residual risks. Option B misrepresents leadership responsibility; top management ensures processes exist, butrisk ownersformally approve residual risk. Option D (avoiding risk) is a treatment option, not the mandated requirement for residual risks.

Thus, the required response isC: Review and acceptance by the risk owner.

ISO/IEC 27001 makes clear that the ISMS is intended to be tailored to the organization. The standard states: “This document also includes requirements for the assessment and treatment of information security risks tailored to the needs of the organization. The requirements set out in this document are generic and are intended to be applicable to all organizations regardless of type, size or nature.” This means implementation is scaled based on each organization’s risk, context, and needs, not a fixed one-size-fits-all set of activities or controls. Clause 6.1.3 further reinforces that control selection is flexible and risk-driven: “Organizations can design controls as required or identify them from any source,” and “Annex A contains a list of possible information security controls… The information security controls listed in Annex A are not exhaustive and additional information security controls can be included if needed.” Together, these extracts verify that the ISMS implementation is influenced by and scaled to the organization’s needs and selected controls, not separated from management processes (A, D) nor mandated to include “all controls” (B).

Clause 5.1 (Leadership and Commitment) requires that:

“Top management shall demonstrate leadership and commitment with respect to the information security management system by… ensuring that the resources needed for the ISMS are available… and supporting persons to contribute to the effectiveness of the ISMS.”

This makes it explicit thattop managementhas the responsibility to ensure personnel are supported so they can contribute to the ISMS. Option B (line management) may provide local support, but ultimate accountability rests with top management. Auditors (C) only evaluate compliance, not provide support. Practitioners (D) help implement, but they don’t bear formal responsibility under the standard.

Thus, the verified answer isA: Top management of the organization.

Clause 6.1.1 (Planning) states:

“The organization shall plan:

d) actions to address these risks and opportunities; and

e) how to:

integrate and implement the actions into its ISMS processes; and

evaluate the effectiveness of these actions.”

This confirms the missing words are“evaluate the effectiveness of”. Communication (A), applying resources (B), and improving effectiveness (C) are important concepts elsewhere but not the direct requirement stated in this clause.

Clause 5.1 (Leadership and Commitment) requires top management to demonstrate leadership by:

“ensuring the information security policy and the information security objectives are established and are compatible with the strategic direction of the organization;”

“ensuring the integration of the ISMS requirements into the organization’s processes;”

“ensuring that the resources needed for the ISMS are available;”

Among the options, the one explicitly mandated isensuring that information security objectives are established. Risk assessments (C) and implementing audit actions (D) are responsibilities of management but not the direct leadership evidence required in Clause 5.1. Communicating interested party feedback (A) is relevant but not specifically cited as leadership evidence. Thus, the verified answer isB.

Clause 10.2 (Continual Improvement) specifies that the organization must“continually improve the suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the information security management system.”

This makes it clear that three attributes are explicitly required to be addressed:

Suitability: ensuring the ISMS continues to meet organizational needs in changing contexts.

Adequacy: ensuring the ISMS covers the necessary scope and provides sufficient control coverage.

Effectiveness: ensuring the ISMS achieves intended outcomes in protecting information security.

The word“importance”is not part of the continual improvement requirement. Importance is implicit in prioritization of risks and actions, but it is not a required continual improvement attribute in ISO/IEC 27001. Therefore, optionD: Importanceis the correct choice as it is not specified.

This distinction reinforces that continual improvement is not about subjective importance, but about systematic enhancement of the ISMS’ssuitability, adequacy, and effectiveness.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract ISO/IEC 27000 standards:

ISO/IEC 27000 defines:

Risk analysis: “process to comprehend the nature of risk and to determine the level of risk” (Clause 3.58).

Risk assessment: the overall process of risk identification, risk analysis, and risk evaluation.

Risk evaluation: compares results of risk analysis against risk criteria to determine priority.

Risk management: coordinated activities to direct and control an organization with regard to risk.

Therefore, the missing word in the given definition is“analysis”.

This is important for ISMS implementation: organizations must understand the distinctions. Risk analysis is the core technical evaluation stage, while assessment is the broader process including evaluation, and management refers to the overall governance of risks.

Thus, the correct verified answer isB: Analysis.

Clause 6.1.2 defines the mandatory elements of risk assessment. Under risk identification, the standard requires: “identifies the information security risks:1) apply the information security risk assessment process to identify risks…; and2) identify the risk owners.” By contrast, considering likelihood and determining levels of risk (options B and D) are part ofrisk analysis(6.1.2 d) “assess the realistic likelihood…”; “determine the levels of risk”), and prioritization for treatment (option C) is part ofrisk evaluation(6.1.2 e) “prioritize the analysed risks for risk treatment”). Therefore, the specific activity that belongs torisk identificationis toidentify the risk owners. This sequencing is prescribed to ensure each risk has a designated owner responsible for decisions on treatment and acceptance downstream.

Clause 4.3 (Determining the scope of the ISMS) requires consideration of:

“the external and internal issues referred to in 4.1; the requirements referred to in 4.2; and interfaces and dependencies between activities performed by the organization, and those that are performed by other organizations.”

This confirms that dependencies between activities are a required factor when defining scope. Options B (quality levels), C (lessons learned), and D (regular activities for improvement) are not scope requirements, though they may be relevant in planning or improvement processes.

Thus, the verified answer is A: Dependencies between activities performed by the organization.

Clause 6.1.2 (Information security risk assessment) requires organizations to “define and apply an information security risk assessment process that… establishes and maintains information security risk criteria, including criteria for accepting risk.”

This means that acceptable levels of risk (risk acceptance criteria) must be explicitly defined. These criteria ensure consistent decision-making when evaluating whether identified risks need further treatment or can be tolerated.

Option A is incorrect because exclusions relate to the ISMS scope (Clause 4.3), not risk assessment planning. Option B is not a requirement; effectiveness of risk assessment methods is not required to be measured, though methods must be applied consistently. Option D is false—the standard clearly specifies required elements for risk assessment.

Thus, the correct answer isC: The criteria for acceptable levels of risk.

The benefits of implementing an ISMS under ISO/IEC 27001 are well established. Clause 0.1 (General) explains that an ISMS provides asystematic approach to managing sensitive informationand “preserves confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information by applying a risk management process and gives confidence to interested parties that risks are adequately managed.”

Option A is correct as a benefit, since trust and confidence from stakeholders is an outcome of compliance. Option C is also a benefit, since controls are chosen and tailored based on organizational context and risk assessment (Clause 6.1.3). Option D reflects another real benefit—reducing the probability and/or impact of incidents through effective risk management.

However,staff qualifications (option B)are not guaranteed benefits of implementing an ISMS. While training and competence (Clause 7.2) are required, the standard does not require or provide ISO/IEC 27001 Foundation-level certification for staff. That is an external training/certification scheme, not an ISMS outcome.

Therefore, the benefitNOT relevantto implementing ISO/IEC 27001 isB.