Selected ISO-IEC-27001-Foundation ISO/IEC 27001 Questions Answers

Clause 5.1 (Leadership and Commitment) requires top management to demonstrate leadership by:

“ensuring the information security policy and the information security objectives are established and are compatible with the strategic direction of the organization;”

“ensuring the integration of the ISMS requirements into the organization’s processes;”

“ensuring that the resources needed for the ISMS are available;”

Among the options, the one explicitly mandated isensuring that information security objectives are established. Risk assessments (C) and implementing audit actions (D) are responsibilities of management but not the direct leadership evidence required in Clause 5.1. Communicating interested party feedback (A) is relevant but not specifically cited as leadership evidence. Thus, the verified answer isB.

Clause 10.2 (Continual Improvement) specifies that the organization must“continually improve the suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the information security management system.”

This makes it clear that three attributes are explicitly required to be addressed:

Suitability: ensuring the ISMS continues to meet organizational needs in changing contexts.

Adequacy: ensuring the ISMS covers the necessary scope and provides sufficient control coverage.

Effectiveness: ensuring the ISMS achieves intended outcomes in protecting information security.

The word“importance”is not part of the continual improvement requirement. Importance is implicit in prioritization of risks and actions, but it is not a required continual improvement attribute in ISO/IEC 27001. Therefore, optionD: Importanceis the correct choice as it is not specified.

This distinction reinforces that continual improvement is not about subjective importance, but about systematic enhancement of the ISMS’ssuitability, adequacy, and effectiveness.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract ISO/IEC 27000 standards:

ISO/IEC 27000 defines:

Risk analysis: “process to comprehend the nature of risk and to determine the level of risk” (Clause 3.58).

Risk assessment: the overall process of risk identification, risk analysis, and risk evaluation.

Risk evaluation: compares results of risk analysis against risk criteria to determine priority.

Risk management: coordinated activities to direct and control an organization with regard to risk.

Therefore, the missing word in the given definition is“analysis”.

This is important for ISMS implementation: organizations must understand the distinctions. Risk analysis is the core technical evaluation stage, while assessment is the broader process including evaluation, and management refers to the overall governance of risks.

Thus, the correct verified answer isB: Analysis.

Clause 6.1.2 defines the mandatory elements of risk assessment. Under risk identification, the standard requires: “identifies the information security risks:1) apply the information security risk assessment process to identify risks…; and2) identify the risk owners.” By contrast, considering likelihood and determining levels of risk (options B and D) are part ofrisk analysis(6.1.2 d) “assess the realistic likelihood…”; “determine the levels of risk”), and prioritization for treatment (option C) is part ofrisk evaluation(6.1.2 e) “prioritize the analysed risks for risk treatment”). Therefore, the specific activity that belongs torisk identificationis toidentify the risk owners. This sequencing is prescribed to ensure each risk has a designated owner responsible for decisions on treatment and acceptance downstream.