APICS CPIM-Part-2 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

Activity-based costing (ABC) is a method of allocating costs to products or services based on the activities that consume resources in the production or delivery process. ABC identifies the cost drivers, which are the factors that cause or influence the amount of resources used for each activity. ABC then assigns costs to products or services based on the amount of cost drivers they use. An advantage of ABC is that it uses cost drivers to allocate costs to products, which provides a more accurate and realistic picture of the cost structure and profitability of each product or service. ABC helps to identify the value-added and non-value-added activities, and to eliminate or reduce the waste and inefficiency in the process. ABC does not allow raw material costs to be allocated on a per unit basis, as raw material costs are usually considered as direct costs that can be traced to each product or service. ABC does not make it easier to establish standard costs, which are the predetermined or expected costs of producing or delivering a product or service. ABC does not enable overhead costs to be allocated evenly across all products, as overhead costs are the indirect costs that cannot be traced to each product or service. ABC allocates overhead costs based on the cost drivers, which may vary for different products or services. References: CPIM Exam Content Manual Version 7.0, Domain 8: Manage Quality, Continuous Improvement, and Technology, Section 8.2: Continuous Improvement Concepts, p. 46; Activity-Based Costing (ABC) Definition; Activity-based costing.

 Long lead-time items are items that take a long time to procure, produce, or deliver. Stable demand means that the demand for these items is predictable and does not fluctuate much over time. A supply chain that supports long lead-time items with stable demand would best be designed to position inventory close to the consumer, because this would reduce the delivery time and improve the customer service level. Positioning inventory close to the consumer also reduces the transportation costs and risks associated with long-distance shipments. A supply chain that uses a pull system, which is based on actual customer orders rather than forecasts, may not be suitable for long lead-time items, because it may not be able to meet the customer demand in a timely manner. A supply chain that is linked through an enterprise resources planning (ERP) system, which is a software system that integrates various business functions and processes, may improve the visibility and coordination of the supply chain, but it does not necessarily reduce the lead time or position inventory close to the consumer. A supply chain that is designed to be responsive, which means that it can quickly adapt to changes in demand or other variables, may not be necessary for long lead-time items with stable demand, because these items have low demand uncertainty and variability. References:

• Inventory Positioning | Supply Chain Resource Cooperative
• Push System vs. Pull System: Adopting A Hybrid Approach To MRP
• What Is Inventory Positioning in Supply Chain Management?

The most appropriate action by the master scheduler is to forward the request to senior management. According to the Time Fence Control (MRP and Supply Chain Planning Help) - Oracle, the demand time fence is a period within which the planning process does not consider forecast demand when calculating actual demand, and the planning time fence is a period within which the planning process does not alter the current material plan or master schedule. The master scheduler can make changes to the master schedule within the planning time fence, but only with approval from senior management. The request from marketing falls between the demand and the planning time fences, which means that it may affect the current material plan or master schedule, as well as the capacity and resource requirements of the production system. Therefore, the master scheduler should forward the request to senior management, who can evaluate the impact and feasibility of the request, and decide whether to approve or reject it.