ACFE CFE-Fraud-Schemes-and-Financial-Crimes Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

Why the correct answer is Human Intelligence

The ACFE Fraud Examiners Manual , in the section on fraud examination tools and intelligence gathering , discusses methods of obtaining information from individuals. One of the recognized methods is Human Intelligence (HUMINT) .

The Manual explains that human intelligence gathering involves:

Collecting information directly from people—often through conversation, elicitation, or interviews—sometimes while using a pretext to encourage the target to disclose information.

In this scenario:

Georgina poses as a customer (a pretext),

Contacts an employee of ERO Corp., and

Elicits sensitive information directly from that individual.

This aligns perfectly with the definition of human intelligence gathering —information obtained directly from human sources , often under false pretenses.

Why the other options are incorrect

B. Scavenging – Incorrect

The Manual describes scavenging as:

Obtaining information by searching for discarded documents or materials, such as in trash or recycling bins.

Georgina is not going through discarded materials; she is speaking directly with an employee.

C. Baiting – Incorrect

Baiting typically refers to:

Enticing someone with something of value to trick them into taking an action, often involving malware-infected media or fraudulent offers.

Georgina is not offering anything or luring the employee with incentives.

D. Open-source intelligence – Incorrect

Open-source intelligence (OSINT) refers to gathering information from:

Publicly available sources such as websites, publications, databases, or social media.

Georgina is not using public sources; she is actively eliciting confidential information from a person under false pretenses.

ACFE Manual References

The concepts used in this answer derive from the Fraud Examiners Manual (2020 International Edition), including:

Human intelligence and data collection techniques

Scavenging as an investigative method

Baiting schemes

Open-source intelligence descriptions

Detailed Explanation:

Rationale for Correct Answer: The Fraud Examiners Manual (2020) highlights document reviews, audit tracing, financial analysis, and inside witnesses as the primary methods of proving corrupt payments. Secret infiltration is not a standard fraud examination technique; it is more aligned with law enforcement undercover operations.

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

A. Taxation inquiries – A valid method to confirm payment sources.

C. Inside witness – Valuable evidence in corruption cases.

D. Tracing payments – Fundamental audit step in proving illicit payments.

Key Concept: Proving corrupt payments — standard audit and investigative methods.

Detailed Explanation:

Rationale for Correct Answer: Irregular, low-value, or unpredictable revenue sources such as parking fees, late charges, or vending machine sales are prime skimming targets. Because they are difficult to estimate or reconcile precisely, theft of these funds is less likely to be detected quickly.

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

B. Recorded sales – These are already in the books and easier to reconcile.

C. Internal audits – A control mechanism, not a target.

D. Register manipulations – A method, not the revenue source itself.

Key Concept: Vulnerable revenue streams as skimming targets.