Free and Premium WGU Managing-Cloud-Security Dumps Questions Answers

When a required PCI DSS control cannot be implemented due to technical limitations, the organization must apply acompensating control. A compensating control is an alternative safeguard that meets the intent and rigor of the original requirement.

Risk acceptance is insufficient under PCI DSS, as compliance demands enforceable safeguards. Privacy controls and protection levels may enhance data security but do not formally replace mandatory encryption requirements.

For example, a provider may use strict access controls, network segmentation, or monitoring to mitigate risks from unencrypted cardholder data. Documenting these compensating controls is essential during audits, ensuring compliance despite system limitations.

Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) delivers fundamental computing resources over the cloud. These include virtual machines, block storage, networking, and load balancers. Customers use these resources to build and manage custom IT solutions, while the provider manages the underlying hardware.

PaaS abstracts infrastructure further, providing a development environment for applications without requiring infrastructure management. SaaS delivers fully functional applications over the internet. NaaS is a narrower category focusing on network delivery.

IaaS is the correct answer because it gives maximum flexibility and control compared to the other models, allowing organizations to build tailored environments. It also requires customers to manage operating systems, middleware, and runtime security, making shared responsibility an essential part of the model.

Content-based discoveryinvolves searching within the actual text or binary content of documents to find matches for keywords, phrases, or patterns. In e-discovery, when the requirement is to locate documents containing a specific phrase, searching based on content is the most direct and reliable method.

Other approaches, such as metadata-based discovery, only examine properties like creation date or author, which do not reveal the presence of specific text. Label-based discovery relies on pre-applied classification labels, which may not always be accurate. Location-based discovery limits searches to folders or storage locations but does not guarantee relevance.

Content-based discovery provides completeness in legal and regulatory investigations. It ensures that no relevant documents are overlooked simply because of inconsistent labeling or metadata, thus supporting compliance and defensibility in court proceedings.

Proceduresare detailed, step-by-step instructions that guide personnel on how to perform specific tasks in alignment with higher-level policies. In an investigation, when uncertainty arises about handling a dataset, procedures provide the exact operational guidance required.

Policies establish high-level rules (e.g., “financial data must be protected”), while procedures explain how to achieve compliance with those policies (e.g., “verify encryption, label dataset, log access, and escalate to compliance officer”). Legal rulings and definitions are external references but do not provide operational steps.

By following documented procedures, investigators ensure consistency, compliance, and defensibility in legal contexts. This also ensures that evidence is handled properly, supporting admissibility in court and protecting the organization against legal or regulatory challenges.

Continuous auditingin the context of Information Rights Management (IRM) allows organizations to monitor access events in real time. It records who accessed a file, when, and how often. This enables organizations to enforce accountability and detect unusual access patterns, which are crucial for both security monitoring and compliance reporting.

Automatic expiration sets a time limit on file availability, while dynamic policy control adjusts permissions based on context (such as location or device). Persistent protection ensures files remain encrypted and controlled wherever they travel. While each feature is valuable, only continuous auditing provides the tracking and visibility into usage required by the scenario.

This approach aligns with governance requirements, providing an audit trail that supports incident response and compliance with data protection regulations. Continuous auditing strengthens both operational security and accountability.

WithSaaS, applications are delivered entirely by the provider, and customers have little to no control over the underlying platform or data portability. This creates a higher risk ofvendor lock-in, as migrating away from one SaaS provider to another may require reworking applications or losing features.

In contrast,PaaSgives customers more flexibility by allowing them to build, deploy, and manage their own applications while relying on standardized frameworks and platforms. Because applications are customer-managed, switching providers or migrating workloads can be easier compared to SaaS.

Vendor lock-out, personnel threats, and natural disasters are risks in any service model. The key differentiator here is portability and flexibility. Choosing PaaS reduces dependence on a single provider’s application features, thereby lowering vendor lock-in risk while still offloading infrastructure management.

Asandboxis a controlled, isolated environment used to safely run, observe, and analyze potentially malicious code. In cybersecurity, sandboxes allow analysts to execute malware samples without risking contamination of production systems. This enables identification of malware behavior, persistence techniques, and indicators of compromise.

Encryption protects confidentiality, but does not allow safe execution. Gateways control traffic flow, and controllers manage devices or workloads. Only a sandbox provides the dedicated containment required for malware analysis.

In cloud environments, sandboxing is often implemented at scale to analyze suspicious files or traffic automatically. This practice enhances defenses against zero-day exploits, advanced persistent threats, and polymorphic malware. By preventing malware from escaping, sandboxes provide essential forensic and detection insights without endangering the wider environment.

The STRIDE threat model identifies six categories: Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information disclosure, Denial of service, and Elevation of privilege. In this scenario, the accountant modified data they were not authorized to change. This is an act ofTampering, which refers to unauthorized alteration of data or systems.

Spoofing would involve impersonating another identity, denial of service would block availability, and elevation of privilege would involve gaining higher access rights. The accountant already had legitimate access but misused it to alter data outside their scope of responsibility.

Tampering compromises data integrity, one of the pillars of the CIA triad. In cloud and enterprise systems, safeguards against tampering include role-based access control, least privilege, and auditing to detect unauthorized changes. Recognizing this as tampering helps in identifying insider misuse and implementing compensating controls.

Functional testingvalidates that new or updated code performs correctly from the end user’s perspective. This type of testing ensures that the patch delivers intended results without introducing errors. It focuses on verifying user interactions, workflows, and outputs.

Full testing may cover all aspects, but it is broader than necessary. Nonfunctional testing evaluates performance, scalability, or usability, not direct functionality. Tabletop testing is a discussion-based exercise, often used for incident response.

Functional testing ensures customer satisfaction by aligning patches with expected system behavior. It is a core component of Agile and DevOps pipelines, where user experience and rapid delivery are prioritized.

Once a vendor has been selected, the onboarding phase requirescontractual verification and technical arrangements for data transfer. This step ensures that service levels, compliance requirements, encryption standards, and responsibilities are clearly defined before operations begin.

Options such as identifying the business need or responding to the RFP are pre-selection activities. Ensuring secure destruction of data is relevant to offboarding, not onboarding. Therefore, the most critical onboarding task is verifying the contract details and ensuring secure data transfer agreements.

Discussing these issues protects the organization from legal disputes, ensures smooth technical integration, and supports compliance with frameworks such as GDPR and PCI DSS. It also defines the scope of vendor accountability in case of security incidents.

The described threat is aDenial of Service (DoS)attack. In security contexts, a DoS attack aims to make a system, application, or data unavailable to legitimate users by overwhelming resources. Unlike brute force or rainbow table attacks, which target authentication mechanisms, or encryption, which is a defensive control, DoS focuses on disrupting availability—the “A” in the Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability (CIA) triad.

DoS can be executed in many ways: flooding a network with traffic, exhausting server memory, or overwhelming application processes. When scaled by multiple coordinated systems, it becomes a Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack. In either case, the effect is the same—authorized users cannot access critical data or services.

For cloud environments, where service uptime is crucial, DoS protections such as rate limiting, auto-scaling, and upstream filtering are essential. Training data center engineers to recognize DoS helps them understand the importance of resilience strategies and ensures continuity planning includes availability safeguards.

Industry best practice requires that encryption keys arestored separately from the data they protect. This ensures that if the data storage system is compromised, attackers cannot immediately decrypt sensitive information. The use of a secure escrow system is a recognized approach.

An escrow provides controlled storage for encryption keys, ensuring they are only accessible by authorized processes and not co-located with the protected data. Keeping keys “local” to the data creates a single point of failure. A public or private repository without specialized protection mechanisms would also be insufficient due to risks of insider threats or misconfiguration.

By placing keys in an independent escrow system, the organization enforces separation of duties, strengthens defense-in-depth, and aligns with cryptographic standards from NIST and ISO. This practice is vital when dealing with archival data, where long-term confidentiality must be preserved even as systems evolve.

TheProcess for Attack Simulation and Threat Analysis (PASTA)is a risk-centric threat modeling methodology that explicitly focuses on simulating real-world attacks from an adversary’s perspective. Unlike STRIDE or DREAD, which classify threats and rate severity, PASTA evaluates how an attacker would exploit vulnerabilities step by step.

PASTA has seven stages, including defining objectives, decomposing applications, and simulating attacks. This methodology helps organizations understand both technical and business risks by looking at the application as an attacker would.

STRIDE categorizes threats, DREAD provides scoring, and ATASM emphasizes architecture and mitigation. While valuable, they are not primarily attack-simulation frameworks. PASTA enables proactive testing of defenses against realistic adversary behaviors, making it especially relevant in modern cloud and DevSecOps environments.

Baselining is the process of establishing a reference point for the standard configuration of systems, networks, or applications. This baseline represents the approved, secure state. By continuously comparing the current environment to the baseline, organizations can detect deviations, unauthorized changes, or misconfigurations.

Patch management involves updating systems, deployment refers to installing new systems, and capacity management focuses on resource planning. While important, these do not establish a standard state for comparison.

Baselining is essential for change management and security auditing. It supports configuration management databases (CMDBs), intrusion detection, and compliance requirements. When deviations are detected, they can be escalated for remediation or formally approved through change control processes.

The unplanned event described is adisruptionof service. In IT service management frameworks like ITIL, disruptions occur when an incident prevents normal service delivery. The goal of incident management is to restore service quickly and minimize impact on customers.

A bug refers to a software defect, which may cause disruptions but is not synonymous with the event itself. An error represents a fault, while change refers to deliberate modifications. Only disruption captures the unplanned nature of service unavailability.

Recognizing incidents as disruptions helps organizations apply structured processes such as escalation, root-cause analysis, and communication. It ensures resilience in cloud-based environments where uptime is a key performance indicator and customer trust is closely tied to availability.

The correct contractual safeguard is anescrow agreement. Data escrow involves storing critical data or software with a neutral third party, which can release it to the customer if the provider fails to meet obligations, such as bankruptcy or service discontinuation.

Indemnification covers liability, offboarding manages termination processes, and encryption secures data but does not ensure availability if the provider disappears.

Escrow provisions protect business continuity by guaranteeing customer access to data regardless of provider viability. They are especially important for organizations handling mission-critical workloads or long-term regulatory obligations in the cloud.

Bollardsare physical barriers designed to prevent vehicles from ramming into or breaching secure facilities. They are often placed at entrances, around perimeters, or in front of critical infrastructure like data centers.

Locks, cameras, and fences provide important physical security, but they cannot stop a high-speed vehicle from causing damage. Cameras record activity, fences create boundaries, and locks secure access points, but only bollards physically block or mitigate vehicle attacks.

Governmental and critical infrastructure sites commonly deploy bollards to protect against both accidental collisions and deliberate vehicle-borne attacks. Combined with layered security measures—such as surveillance and fencing—they enhance resilience against physical threats to sensitive data centers.

Multifactor Authentication (MFA)is a commonly mandated control for obtaining cybersecurity insurance. MFA requires users to present at least two independent factors—something they know (password), something they have (token), or something they are (biometrics). This significantly reduces the risk of unauthorized access due to stolen or weak credentials.

Network segmentation and application whitelisting are valuable, but they are not universal insurance requirements. TPM is a hardware component for securing local devices but does not protect remote access in distributed work models.

By enforcing MFA across VPNs, cloud services, email, and administrative interfaces, organizations demonstrate strong access control measures. Insurance providers recognize MFA as a foundational safeguard, reducing claims risk from credential-based breaches. This makes MFA both a compliance requirement and a best practice.

The correct approach for sanitizing a USB thumb drive while preserving its usability isoverwriting. Overwriting involves replacing the existing data on the device with random data or specific patterns to ensure that the original information cannot be recovered. This process leaves the physical device intact, allowing it to be reused securely.

Physical destruction, such as shredding, renders the device unusable. Degaussing only works on magnetic media like hard disks or tapes, not on solid-state or flash-based USB drives. Key revocation applies to cryptographic keys and not to physical devices.

By using overwriting, organizations comply with data sanitization standards while balancing operational efficiency. Many tools exist that perform multi-pass overwrites to meet regulatory requirements such as those from NIST or ISO. This ensures that sensitive data is removed while allowing the device to remain in circulation for continued use.

By analyzing natural events that could impact data centers and assessing the risks associated with each, the leadership team isdefining the disaster criteria. This step determines what conditions or events qualify as disasters requiring activation of the recovery plan.

An asset inventory identifies systems, but here the focus is on external events. A disaster declaration process occurs during an actual event, and identifying actions comes later when response strategies are created.

Defining disaster criteria is essential to avoid ambiguity during crises. It establishes thresholds such as “category 4 hurricanes,” “regional power outages exceeding 12 hours,” or “seismic events over a set magnitude.” Clear criteria ensure consistent decision-making and timely activation of recovery procedures.

TheOperational Excellencepillar emphasizes practices that allow organizations to develop, deploy, and operate workloads effectively. It includes monitoring operations, responding to incidents, and continuously improving processes. By embedding feedback loops, organizations enhance agility and ensure that technology supports business value.

Performance efficiency deals with using computing resources efficiently, reliability ensures system availability, and sustainability focuses on environmental responsibility. While important, these do not encompass the process-driven improvements at the heart of operational excellence.

Operational excellence ensures that organizations can adapt quickly to changes, implement automation, and drive consistent improvements across cloud workloads. It is a key principle in cloud frameworks like AWS Well-Architected, Microsoft CAF, and Google’s Reliability Engineering practices.

Platform as a Service (PaaS) allows customers to focus on writing and deploying code without managing the underlying infrastructure. The provider manages the operating system, runtime, and middleware, enabling faster development cycles and reduced administrative overhead.

IaaS would require the customer to configure servers and operating systems, SaaS provides ready-to-use applications, and DSaaS is a specialized category for analytics.

By abstracting the infrastructure, PaaS accelerates innovation and reduces operational burden but also limits flexibility in some cases. Security responsibilities under PaaS focus on application-level controls, while the provider handles infrastructure-level protections.

AHardware Security Module (HSM)is a dedicated, tamper-resistant device designed for creating, managing, and storing encryption keys. In cloud environments, HSMs are essential for securing cryptographic operations, such as SSL/TLS key management, digital signatures, and secure data transmission.

TPMs are hardware chips used to secure local devices, such as laptops. Memory controllers and RAID controllers manage system performance and storage but are not cryptographic devices.

HSMs provide strong protection against key theft or misuse by isolating cryptographic functions from general-purpose computing resources. They are often certified under standards like FIPS 140-2, ensuring compliance with stringent security requirements. In cloud services, customers can use provider-managed HSMs or deploy dedicated virtual HSM instances for secure key management.

TheCLOUD Actaddresses conflicts that arise when law enforcement in one jurisdiction seeks access to data stored in another country. It clarifies how U.S. authorities can compel cloud providers to produce data, even if stored overseas, and establishes a framework for resolving jurisdictional conflicts through bilateral agreements.

The Act does not regulate genetic data, breach notifications, or employer surveillance. Its central purpose is to handle the challenge of cross-border data access in the era of globalized cloud computing.

For organizations, this means carefully evaluating how and where data is stored, and ensuring contracts and compliance strategies account for potential conflicts between U.S. law and foreign privacy regulations like GDPR. Awareness of CLOUD Act obligations is crucial in multinational cloud deployments.