Legit JN0-281 Exam Download

On Junos switching platforms used in data centers, a VLAN is a Layer 2 broadcast domain. To make a VLAN functional for user traffic, you define the VLAN with a name and typically a VLAN ID, and you associate Layer 2 interfaces with that VLAN so frames arriving on those interfaces are placed into the correct broadcast domain. Without interface membership, the VLAN exists as configuration but does not carry endpoint traffic because no ports participate in it. This is why assigning a VLAN name or ID and associating Layer 2 interfaces to the VLAN is a correct requirement.

Trunk mode interfaces are designed to carry multiple VLANs over a single physical link using 802.1Q tagging. In a data center, trunks are common on leaf-to-spine uplinks, switch-to-switch connections, and server connections where the host or hypervisor tags multiple VLANs. Therefore, assigning one or more VLANs to a trunk port is correct.

An IRB interface is not required for every VLAN. IRB is only needed when the VLAN requires Layer 3 gateway functionality, such as inter-VLAN routing or default gateway services for that subnet. Pure Layer 2 VLANs do not need IRB. Also, an access mode interface is intended to belong to a single VLAN and typically carries untagged traffic, so assigning multiple VLANs to an access mode interface is not correct in standard Ethernet switching behavior.

On Junos Ethernet switching platforms, the Layer 2 forwarding decision is based on a MAC address lookup table. Juniper commonly refers to this as the Ethernet switching table, which contains learned source MAC addresses mapped to an ingress interface and a VLAN or bridge domain context. This table is built dynamically through normal Layer 2 learning, and it is what allows the switch to forward known unicast frames to the correct egress interface instead of flooding within the broadcast domain.

In Juniper terminology, the forwarding plane also maintains a forwarding database used to program hardware forwarding entries. While the term forwarding information base is most often associated with Layer 3 forwarding for IP prefixes, many training and operational contexts use FIB language when describing the programmed forwarding state in the data plane, including the entries that result from Ethernet switching learning. The key idea is that the control plane and switching processes populate forwarding state, and the forwarding plane uses that state to make fast, deterministic forwarding decisions at line rate.

Options inet.0 and RIB are Layer 3 constructs. inet.0 is the main IPv4 routing table, and the RIB is the routing information base that stores routes before they are programmed into forwarding. Neither represents the Layer 2 MAC learning table.

In Junos-based data center switching, an IRB interface is the Layer 3 gateway that is logically associated with a Layer 2 VLAN or bridge domain. The VLAN provides Layer 2 bridging inside the broadcast domain, while the IRB interface provides the routed interface that enables hosts in that VLAN to reach destinations outside their local subnet. This is the standard mechanism used for inter-VLAN routing on Juniper switches and for providing default gateway services to servers connected to access ports or VLAN-tagged trunks.

Operationally, endpoints in a VLAN use the IRB interface IP address as their default gateway. Frames destined to a remote subnet are bridged at Layer 2 to the IRB gateway MAC address, and then the packet is routed at Layer 3 based on the routing table. This allows a single device to perform both bridging within the VLAN and routing between VLANs or to other routed interfaces, which is why the concept is called integrated routing and bridging.

IRB does not encrypt traffic and does not provide NAT by itself; those functions are typically associated with security services features and firewall platforms. IRB is also not the mechanism that performs pure bridging within the same VLAN, because bridging is handled by the VLAN or bridge domain and the Ethernet switching table.

A five-stage IP fabric is typically used when a single pod, even with a three-stage design, cannot meet overall scale requirements for port count, bandwidth, or modular growth. In this model, the data center is built from multiple fabric pods, where each pod is commonly a three-stage topology that includes leaf switches and one or more spine layers. The superspine layer provides the interconnect that ties these pods together into a larger fabric. Functionally, superspines create high-capacity, routed connectivity between the spine layers of different pods so that endpoints in any pod can reach endpoints in any other pod using consistent Layer 3 forwarding principles and equal-cost multipath behavior where applicable.

Option D is correct because the superspine layer is the aggregation and inter-pod transit layer. It does not exist to force every leaf to connect to every spine across the entire multi-pod deployment. That full mesh property is preserved within a pod, not across the entire site at extreme scale. The superspine layer also does not create a Layer 2 underlay; modern fabrics use a routed underlay to avoid spanning tree limitations and to enable deterministic multipathing. Finally, the superspine layer is not defined by creating a single common BGP autonomous system; autonomous system design is a policy choice, while the superspine role is a physical and logical interconnection function between pods.