Insurance Licensing NY-Independent-General-Adjuster Online Access

The correct answer is B. Under the standard CGL condition titled Duties in the Event of Occurrence, Offense, Claim or Suit, the insured must see that the insurer is notified as soon as practicable of an occurrence or offense that may result in a claim. The notice should, to the extent possible, identify how, when, and where the occurrence happened, the names and addresses of injured persons and witnesses, and the nature and location of resulting injury or damage. New York Court of Appeals decisions reproduce this CGL condition substantially verbatim.

Option A is incorrect because the standard CGL does not establish a universal seven-day reporting deadline. Option C is defective because cooperation is not discretionary; the insured must cooperate with investigation, settlement, and defense and provide assistance when requested. Option D is far too broad because the policy does not require reporting every business matter.

Once an actual claim or suit is received, additional duties apply, including promptly notifying the insurer and forwarding demands, notices, summonses, and legal papers.

The Series 17-70 outline specifically covers CGL conditions, occurrence versus claims-made coverage, investigation, and duties after loss or claim.

The correct answer is C — an aggregate limit. An aggregate limit establishes the maximum amount an insurer will pay for all covered claims subject to that aggregate during the applicable policy period, ordinarily one year. The Hartford describes an aggregate limit as the maximum amount an insurer pays for all claims during the policy period.

This must be distinguished from an occurrence limit, which caps the amount payable for one occurrence. For example, a liability policy might provide a $1 million each-occurrence limit and a $2 million general aggregate. Multiple individually covered occurrences can therefore consume the aggregate until the total available limit has been exhausted.

A single limit generally refers to one combined limit rather than separate limits for different components, such as bodily injury and property damage. “Face amount” is terminology more commonly associated with life insurance or other contracts stating a specified benefit amount and does not describe an annual liability ceiling.

The official Series 17-70 outline specifically tests policy limits, per-occurrence limits, per-person limits, general and products/completed-operations aggregate limits, single/split limits, and combined single limits.

Thus, when the question asks for the limit controlling the maximum cumulative payout during the annual policy period, aggregate limit is the precise insurance term.

Therefore, C is correct.

The intended answer is B. Under the dwelling broad form, the two named-peril provisions carrying the vacancy limitation tested by this item are Damage by Burglars and Accidental Discharge or Overflow of Water or Steam. Older DP 00 02 language provided that damage by burglars was not covered when the dwelling had been vacant for more than 30 consecutive days, and the accidental-discharge peril contained the same 30-day vacancy restriction.

Falling Objects and Weight of Ice, Snow, or Sleet have their own coverage limitations, but the specific vacancy restriction presented here does not apply to those perils. Freezing is controlled by separate requirements concerning reasonable care to maintain heat or shut off the water supply and drain the systems.

For Series 17-70 accuracy, there is an important edition distinction: the official New York outline identifies the Dwelling (2014) Policy, and ISO DP 00 02 07 14 changed the comparable vacancy period to 60 consecutive days, not 30. The same two relevant perils remain Damage by Burglars and Accidental Discharge/Overflow of Water or Steam.

Thus, B is the intended answer, while the video's “30 consecutive days” language reflects the older dwelling-form edition.