Ace Your AI-901 Microsoft Certified: Azure AI Fundamentals Exam

Evaluating model outcomes across demographic groups to reduce bias is an example of the Microsoft responsible AI principle of fairness .

The Microsoft responsible AI principle of fairness means AI systems should treat all people fairly and avoid unfair bias or discrimination across groups.

The other options are incorrect:

accountability means people and organizations remain responsible for AI systems and their effects.

privacy and security focuses on protecting data and controlling access.

transparency means users should understand when and how AI is being used, including system capabilities and limitations.

The chatbot must interpret user intent and route actions such as accepting orders, retrieving support documents, and retrieving order status. This is language understanding , because the system must understand what the user wants to do from natural language input.

To compare the costs of large language models in Microsoft Foundry portal, use the Model leaderboard .

Microsoft documentation states that the model leaderboard helps compare models across quality, safety, estimated cost, and throughput . It also supports trade-off charts and side-by-side model comparison for features, performance, and estimated cost.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Evaluator catalog is for selecting evaluators to measure model or application outputs, not comparing LLM costs.

C. Compliance relates to governance and compliance, not model cost comparison.

D. Tools provides Foundry tools, not benchmarked cost comparison across models.

Statement 1: Evaluators in Microsoft Foundry replace the need for configuring token limits. = No

Evaluators are used to assess model or agent output quality, safety, and reliability. They do not replace model configuration settings such as token limits. Microsoft describes evaluators as tools that measure the quality, safety, and reliability of AI responses.

Statement 2: Evaluators in Microsoft Foundry can assess the quality and safety of responses generated by a generative AI model. = Yes

This is correct. Microsoft Foundry includes built-in evaluators for general quality metrics such as coherence and fluency, safety/security metrics, RAG metrics, and agent-specific metrics.

Statement 3: Evaluators in Microsoft Foundry can retrain a deployed generative AI model automatically when quality issues are detected. = No

Evaluators measure and report quality, safety, and reliability issues. They do not automatically retrain deployed generative AI models. Microsoft describes evaluation as measuring model or agent performance against test data, while monitoring can alert when outputs fail quality thresholds.