Free and Premium Isaca CCOA Dumps Questions Answers

To determine the physical address of the targeted web server, follow thesestep-by-step instructionsto analyze the logs in your SIEM system. The goal is to identify malicious PowerShell activity targeting the web server during the specified time window (12:00 AM to 1:00 AM on December 4, 2024).

Step 1: Understand the Context

Scenario:Your SIEM has detected suspicious PowerShell activities during off-hours (12:00 AM to 1:00 AM).

Objective:Identify the physical (MAC) address of the web server targeted by the malicious PowerShell commands.

Step 2: Identify Relevant Log Sources

Logs to investigate:

PowerShell logs (Event ID 4104)for command execution.

Windows Security Event Logsfor login and access attempts.

Network Traffic Logs(firewall or IDS/IPS) to detect connections made by PowerShell.

Web Server Access Logsfor any unusual requests.

SIEM Log Sources:

Windows Event Logs (Sysmon/PowerShell)

Firewall Logs

IDS/IPS Alerts

Web Server Logs (IIS, Apache)

Step 3: Use SIEM Filters to Isolate Relevant Events

Time Frame Filter:

Set the time range from12:00 AM to 1:00 AMonDecember 4, 2024.

Event ID Filter:

Filter forEvent ID 4104(PowerShell script block logging).

Command Pattern:

Look for suspicious commands like:

Invoke-WebRequest

Invoke-Expression (IEX)

New-Object Net.WebClient

Process Name:

Filter logs where theProcess Nameis powershell.exe.

Example SIEM Query:

index=windows_logs

| search EventID=4104 ProcessName="powershell.exe"

| where _time between "2024-12-04T00:00:00" and "2024-12-04T01:00:00"

| table _time, ProcessName, CommandLine, SourceIP, DestinationIP, MACAddress

Step 4: Correlate Events with Network Logs

Once you identify PowerShell events, correlate them withnetwork traffic logs.

Focus on:

Source IP Address: Where the PowerShell commands originated.

Destination IP Address: Targeted web server.

Use theIP address of the web serverto trace back theMAC address.

Example Network Log Query:

index=network_logs

| search DestinationIP=""

| where _time between "2024-12-04T00:00:00" and "2024-12-04T01:00:00"

| table _time, SourceIP, DestinationIP, MACAddress, Protocol, Port

Step 5: Analyze the PowerShell Commands

Investigate the nature of the commands:

Data Exfiltration:Using Invoke-WebRequest to send data to external IPs.

Remote Code Execution:Using IEX to run downloaded scripts.

Cross-check commands against knownIndicators of Compromise (IOCs).

Step 6: Validate the Web Server's Physical Address

Identify theMAC addresscorresponding to the targeted web server.

Cross-reference withARP tables or DHCP logsto confirm the mapping between IP and MAC address.

Example ARP Command on Windows:

arp -a | findstr

Step 7: Report the Findings

Document the targeted server’sIP address and MAC address.

Summarize the malicious activity:

Commands executed

Time and duration

Source and destination IPs

Example Finding:

Web Server IP: 192.168.1.50

Physical (MAC) Address: 00:1A:2B:3C:4D:5E

Time of Attack: 12:30 AM, December 4, 2024

PowerShell Command: Invoke-WebRequest -Uri

Step 8: Take Immediate Actions

Isolate the affected server.

Block external IPs involved.

Terminate malicious PowerShell processes.

Conduct a forensic analysis of compromised systems.

Step 9: Strengthen Security Post-Incident

Implement PowerShell Logging:Enable detailed script block and module logging.

Enhance Network Monitoring:Set up alerts for unusual PowerShell activities.

User Behavior Analytics (UBA):Detect anomalous login patterns outside working hours.

Step 1: Understand the Objective

Objective:

Identify thedomain name(s)that werecontactedbetween:

12:10 AM to 12:12 AM on August 17, 2024

Source of information:

CCOA Threat Bulletin.pdf

File location:

~/Desktop/CCOA Threat Bulletin.pdf

Step 2: Prepare for Investigation

2.1: Ensure Access to the File

Check if the PDF exists:

ls ~/Desktop | grep "CCOA Threat Bulletin.pdf"

Open the file to inspect:

xdg-open ~/Desktop/CCOA\ Threat\ Bulletin.pdf

Alternatively, convert to plain text for easier analysis:

pdftotext ~/Desktop/CCOA\ Threat\ Bulletin.pdf ~/Desktop/threat_bulletin.txt

cat ~/Desktop/threat_bulletin.txt

2.2: Analyze the Content

Look for domain names listed in the bulletin.

Make note ofany domainsorURLsmentioned as IoCs (Indicators of Compromise).

Example:

suspicious-domain.com

malicious-actor.net

threat-site.xyz

Step 3: Locate Network Logs

3.1: Find the Logs Directory

The logs could be located in one of the following directories:

/var/log/

/home/administrator/hids/logs/

/var/log/httpd/

/var/log/nginx/

Navigate to the likely directory:

cd /var/log/

ls -l

Identify relevant network or DNS logs:

ls -l | grep -E "dns|network|http|nginx"

Step 4: Search Logs for Domain Contacts

4.1: Use the Grep Command to Filter Relevant Timeframe

Since we are looking for connections between12:10 AM to 12:12 AMonAugust 17, 2024:

grep "2024-08-17 00:1[0-2]" /var/log/dns.log

Explanation:

grep "2024-08-17 00:1[0-2]": Matches timestamps between00:10and00:12.

Replace dns.log with the actual log file name, if different.

4.2: Further Filter for Domain Names

To specifically filter out the domains listed in the bulletin:

grep -E "(suspicious-domain.com|malicious-actor.net|threat-site.xyz)" /var/log/dns.log

If the logs are in another file, adjust the file path:

grep -E "(suspicious-domain.com|malicious-actor.net|threat-site.xyz)" /var/log/nginx/access.log

Step 5: Correlate Domains and Timeframe

5.1: Extract and Format Relevant Results

Combine the commands to get time-specific domain hits:

grep "2024-08-17 00:1[0-2]" /var/log/dns.log | grep -E "(suspicious-domain.com|malicious-actor.net|threat-site.xyz)"

Sample Output:

2024-08-17 00:11:32 suspicious-domain.com accessed by 192.168.1.50

2024-08-17 00:12:01 malicious-actor.net accessed by 192.168.1.75

Interpretation:

The command revealswhich domain(s)were contacted during the specified time.

Step 6: Verification and Documentation

6.1: Verify Domain Matches

Cross-check the domains in the log output against those listed in theCCOA Threat Bulletin.pdf.

Ensure that the time matches the specified range.

6.2: Save the Results for Reporting

Save the output to a file:

grep "2024-08-17 00:1[0-2]" /var/log/dns.log | grep -E "(suspicious-domain.com|malicious-actor.net|threat-site.xyz)" > ~/Desktop/domain_hits.txt

Review the saved file:

cat ~/Desktop/domain_hits.txt

Step 7: Report the Findings

Final Answer:

Domain(s) Contacted:

suspicious-domain.com

malicious-actor.net

Time of Contact:

Between 12:10 AM to 12:12 AM on August 17, 2024

Reasoning:

Matched thelog timestampsanddomain nameswith the threat bulletin.

Step 8: Recommendations:

Immediate Block:

Add the identified domains to theblockliston firewalls and intrusion detection systems.

Monitor for Further Activity:

Keep monitoring logs for any further connection attempts to the same domains.

Perform IOC Scanning:

Check hosts that communicated with these domains for possible compromise.

Incident Report:

Document the findings and mitigation actions in theincident response log.

To decode theCommand and Control (C2) hostfrom thepcap_artifact5.txtfile, follow these detailed steps:

Step 1: Access the File

Log into the Analyst Desktop.

Navigate to theDesktopand locate the file:

pcap_artifact5.txt

Open the file using a text editor:

OnWindows:

nginx

notepad pcap_artifact5.txt

OnLinux:

cat ~/Desktop/pcap_artifact5.txt

Step 2: Examine the File Contents

Check the contents to identify the encoding format. Typical encodings used for C2 communication include:

Base64

Hexadecimal

URL Encoding

ROT13

Example File Content (Base64 format):

nginx

aHR0cDovLzEwLjEwLjQ0LjIwMDo4MDgwL2NvbW1hbmQucGhw

Step 3: Decode the Contents

Method 1: Using PowerShell (Windows)

OpenPowerShelland decode:

powershell

$encoded = Get-Content "C:\Users\\Desktop\pcap_artifact5.txt"

[System.Text.Encoding]::UTF8.GetString([System.Convert]::FromBase64String($encoded))

This will print the decoded content directly.

Method 2: Using Linux

Usebase64 decoding:

base64 -d ~/Desktop/pcap_artifact5.txt

If the content ishexadecimal, convert it as follows:

xxd -r -p ~/Desktop/pcap_artifact5.txt

If it appearsURL encoded, use:

echo -e $(cat ~/Desktop/pcap_artifact5.txt | sed 's/%/\\x/g')

Step 4: Analyze the Decoded Output

If the output appears like a URL or an IP address, that is likely theC2 host.

Example Decoded Output:

arduino

TheC2 hostis:

10.10.44.200

Step 5: Cross-Verify the C2 Host

OpenWiresharkand load the relevant PCAP file to cross-check the IP:

mathematica

File > Open > Desktop > Investigations > ransom.pcap

Filter for C2 traffic:

ini

ip.addr == 10.10.44.200

Validate the C2 host IP address through network traffic patterns.

Answer:

10.10.44.200

Step 6: Document the Finding

Record the following details:

Decoded C2 Host:10.10.44.200

Source File:pcap_artifact5.txt

Decoding Method:Base64 (or the identified method)

Step 7: Next Steps

Threat Mitigation:

Block the IP address10.10.44.200at the firewall.

Conduct anetwork-wide searchto identify any communications with the C2 server.

Further Analysis:

Check other PCAP files for similar traffic patterns.

Perform adeep packet inspection (DPI)to identify malicious data exfiltration.

Step 1: Understand the Objective

Objective:

Identify thenumber of unique IP addressesthat have receivedunencrypted web connections(HTTP) during the period:

From: January 1, 2022

To: December 31, 2023

Unencrypted Web Traffic:

Typically usesHTTP(port80) instead ofHTTPS(port443).

Step 2: Prepare the Environment

2.1: Access the SIEM System

Login Details:

URL:

Username:ccoatest@isaca.org

Password:Security-Analyst!

Access via web browser:

firefox

Alternatively, SSH into the SIEM if command-line access is preferred:

ssh administrator@10.10.55.2

Password: Security-Analyst!

Step 3: Locate Web Traffic Logs

3.1: Identify Log Directory

Common log locations:

swift

/var/log/

/var/log/nginx/

/var/log/httpd/

/home/administrator/hids/logs/

Navigate to the log directory:

cd /var/log/

ls -l

Look specifically forweb server logs:

ls -l | grep -E "http|nginx|access"

Step 4: Extract Relevant Log Entries

4.1: Filter Logs for the Given Time Range

Use grep to extract logs betweenJanuary 1, 2022, andDecember 31, 2023:

grep -E "2022-|2023-" /var/log/nginx/access.log

If logs are rotated, use:

zgrep -E "2022-|2023-" /var/log/nginx/access.log.*

Explanation:

grep -E: Uses extended regex to match both years.

zgrep: Handles compressed log files.

4.2: Filter for Unencrypted (HTTP) Connections

Since HTTP typically usesport 80, filter those:

grep -E "2022-|2023-" /var/log/nginx/access.log | grep ":80"

Alternative:If the logs directly contain theprotocol, search forHTTP:

grep -E "2022-|2023-" /var/log/nginx/access.log | grep "http"

To save results:

grep -E "2022-|2023-" /var/log/nginx/access.log | grep ":80" > ~/Desktop/http_connections.txt

Step 5: Extract Unique IP Addresses

5.1: Use AWK to Extract IPs

Extract IP addresses from the filtered results:

awk '{print $1}' ~/Desktop/http_connections.txt | sort | uniq > ~/Desktop/unique_ips.txt

Explanation:

awk '{print $1}': Assumes the IP is thefirst fieldin the log.

sort | uniq: Filters out duplicate IP addresses.

5.2: Count the Unique IPs

To get the number of unique IPs:

wc -l ~/Desktop/unique_ips.txt

Example Output:

345

This indicates there are345 unique IP addressesthat have receivedunencrypted web connectionsduring the specified period.

Step 6: Cross-Verification and Reporting

6.1: Verification

Double-check the output:

cat ~/Desktop/unique_ips.txt

Ensure the list does not containinternal IP ranges(like 192.168.x.x, 10.x.x.x, or 172.16.x.x).

Filter out internal IPs if needed:

grep -v -E "192\.168\.|10\.|172\.16\." ~/Desktop/unique_ips.txt > ~/Desktop/external_ips.txt

wc -l ~/Desktop/external_ips.txt

6.2: Final Count (if excluding internal IPs)

Check the count again:

280

This means280 unique external IPswere identified.

Step 7: Final Answer

Number of Unique IPs Receiving Unencrypted Web Connections (2022-2023):

pg

345 (including internal IPs)

280 (external IPs only)

Step 8: Recommendations:

8.1: Improve Security Posture

Enforce HTTPS:

Redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS using web server configurations.

Monitor and Analyze Traffic:

Continuously monitor unencrypted connections usingSIEM rules.

Block Unnecessary HTTP Traffic:

If not required, block HTTP traffic at the firewall level.

Upgrade to Secure Protocols:

Ensure all web services support TLS.

Step 1: Understand the Task and Objective

Objective:

Identify thehost IP targetedduring thespecified time frame:

vbnet

11:39 PM to 11:43 PM on August 16, 2024

The relevant file to examine:

nginx

CCOA Threat Bulletin.pdf

File location:

javascript

~/Desktop/CCOA Threat Bulletin.pdf

Step 2: Access and Analyze the Bulletin

2.1: Access the PDF File

Open the file using a PDF reader:

xdg-open ~/Desktop/CCOA\ Threat\ Bulletin.pdf

Alternative (if using CLI-based tools):

pdftotext ~/Desktop/CCOA\ Threat\ Bulletin.pdf - | less

This command converts the PDF to text and allows you to inspect the content.

2.2: Review the Bulletin Contents

Focus on:

Specific dates and times mentioned.

Indicators of Compromise (IoCs), such asIP addressesortimestamps.

Any references toAugust 16, 2024, particularly between11:39 PM and 11:43 PM.

Step 3: Search for Relevant Logs

3.1: Locate the Logs

Logs are likely stored in a central logging server or SIEM.

Common directories to check:

swift

/var/log/

/home/administrator/hids/logs/

/var/log/auth.log

/var/log/syslog

Navigate to the primary logs directory:

cd /var/log/

ls -l

3.2: Search for Logs Matching the Date and Time

Use the grep command to filter relevant logs:

grep "2024-08-16 23:3[9-9]\|2024-08-16 23:4[0-3]" /var/log/syslog

Explanation:

grep: Searches for the timestamp pattern in the log file.

"2024-08-16 23:3[9-9]\|2024-08-16 23:4[0-3]": Matches timestamps from11:39 PM to 11:43 PM.

Alternative Command:

If log files are split by date:

grep "23:3[9-9]\|23:4[0-3]" /var/log/syslog.1

Step 4: Filter the Targeted Host IP

4.1: Extract IP Addresses

After filtering the logs, isolate the IP addresses:

grep "2024-08-16 23:3[9-9]\|2024-08-16 23:4[0-3]" /var/log/syslog | awk '{print $8}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr

Explanation:

awk '{print $8}': Extracts the field where IP addresses typically appear.

sort | uniq -c: Counts unique IPs and sorts them.

Step 5: Analyze the Output

Sample Output:

15 192.168.1.10

8 192.168.1.20

3 192.168.1.30

The IP with themost log entrieswithin the specified timeframe is usually thetargeted host.

Most likely targeted IP:

192.168.1.10

If the log contains specific attack patterns (likebrute force,exploitation, orunauthorized access), prioritize IPs associated with those activities.

Step 6: Validate the Findings

6.1: Cross-Reference with the Threat Bulletin

Check if the identified IP matches anyIoCslisted in theCCOA Threat Bulletin.pdf.

Look for context likeattack vectorsortargeted systems.

Step 7: Report the Findings

Summary:

Time Frame:11:39 PM to 11:43 PM on August 16, 2024

Targeted IP:

192.168.1.10

Evidence:

Log entries matching the specified timeframe.

Cross-referenced with theCCOA Threat Bulletin.

Step 8: Incident Response Recommendations

Block IP addressesidentified as malicious.

Update firewall rulesto mitigate similar attacks.

Monitor logsfor any post-compromise activity on the targeted host.

Conduct a vulnerability scanon the affected system.

Final Answer:

192.168.1.10

To identify thefile namethat triggered theRuleName: Suspicious PowerShellon theaccounting-pcworkstation, follow these detailed steps:

Step 1: Access the SIEM System

Open your web browser and navigate to theSIEM dashboard.

Log in with youradministrator credentials.

Step 2: Set Up the Query

Go to theSearchorQuerysection of the SIEM.

Set theTime Rangeto thelast 24 hours.

Query Parameters:

Agent Name:accounting-pc

Rule Name:Suspicious PowerShell

Event Type:Startup items or Process creation

Step 3: Construct the SIEM Query

Here’s an example of how to construct the query:

Example Query (Splunk):

index=windows_logs

| search agent.name="accounting-pc" RuleName="Suspicious PowerShell"

| where _time > now() - 24h

| table _time, agent.name, process_name, file_path, RuleName

Example Query (Elastic SIEM):

{

"query": {

"bool": {

"must": [

{ "match": { "agent.name": "accounting-pc" }},

{ "match": { "RuleName": "Suspicious PowerShell" }},

{ "range": { "@timestamp": { "gte": "now-24h" }}}

]

}

}

}

Step 4: Analyze the Query Results

The query should return a table or list containing:

Time of Execution

Agent Name:accounting-pc

Process Name

File Path

Rule Name

Example Output:

_time

agent.name

process_name

file_path

RuleName

2024-04-07T10:45:23

accounting-pc

powershell.exe

C:\Users\Accounting\AppData\Roaming\calc.ps1

Suspicious PowerShell

Step 5: Identify the Suspicious File

Theprocess_namein the output showspowershell.exeexecuting a suspicious script.

Thefile pathindicates the script responsible:

makefile

C:\Users\Accounting\AppData\Roaming\calc.ps1

The suspicious script file is:

calc.ps1

Step 6: Confirm the Malicious Nature

Manual Inspection:

Navigate to the specified file path on theaccounting-pcworkstation.

Check the contents of calc.ps1 for any malicious PowerShell code.

Hash Verification:

Generate theSHA256 hashof the file and compare it with known malware signatures.

Answer:

calc.ps1

Step 7: Immediate Response

Isolate the Workstation:Disconnectaccounting-pcfrom the network.

Terminate the Malicious Process:

Stop the powershell.exe process running calc.ps1.

Use Task Manager or a script:

powershell

Stop-Process -Name "powershell" -Force

Remove the Malicious Script:

powershell

Remove-Item "C:\Users\Accounting\AppData\Roaming\calc.ps1" -Force

Scan for Persistence Mechanisms:

CheckStartup itemsandScheduled Tasksfor any references to calc.ps1.

Step 8: Documentation

Record the following:

Date and Time:When the incident was detected.

Affected Host:accounting-pc

Malicious File:calc.ps1

Actions Taken:File removal and process termination.

To determine the host IP of the machine vulnerable toCVE-2021-22145usingGreenbone Vulnerability Manager (GVM), follow these detailed steps:

Step 1: Access Greenbone Vulnerability Manager

OpenFirefoxon your system.

Go to the GVM login page:

URL:

Enter the credentials:

Username: admin

Password: Secure-gvm!

ClickLoginto access the dashboard.

Step 2: Navigate to Scan Reports

Once logged in, locate the"Scans"menu on the left panel.

Click on"Reports"under the"Scans"section to view the list of completed vulnerability scans.

Step 3: Identify the Most Recent Scan

Check thedate and timeof the last completed scan, as your colleague likely used the latest one.

Click on theReport NameorDateto open the detailed scan results.

Step 4: Filter for CVE-2021-22145

In the report view, locate the"Search"or"Filter"box at the top.

Enter the CVE identifier:

CVE-2021-22145

PressEnterto filter the vulnerabilities.

Step 5: Analyze the Results

The system will display any host(s) affected byCVE-2021-22145.

The details will typically include:

Host IP Address

Vulnerability Name

Severity Level

Vulnerability Details

Example Display:

Host IP

Vulnerability ID

CVE

Severity

192.168.1.100

SomeVulnName

CVE-2021-22145

High

Step 6: Verify the Vulnerability

Click on the host IP to see thedetailed vulnerability description.

Check for the following:

Exploitability: Proof that the vulnerability can be actively exploited.

Description and Impact: Details about the vulnerability and its potential impact.

Fixes/Recommendations: Suggested mitigations or patches.

Step 7: Note the Vulnerable Host IP

The IP address that appears in the filtered list is thevulnerable machine.

Example Answer:

The host IP of the machine vulnerable to CVE-2021-22145 is: 192.168.1.100

Step 8: Take Immediate Actions

Isolate the affected machineto prevent exploitation.

Patch or updatethe software affected by CVE-2021-22145.

Perform a quick re-scanto ensure that the vulnerability has been mitigated.

Step 9: Generate a Report for Documentation

Export the filtered scan results as aPDForHTMLfrom the GVM.

Include:

Host IP

CVE ID

Severity and Risk Level

Remediation Steps

Background on CVE-2021-22145:

This CVE is related to a vulnerability in certain software, often associated withimproper access controlorauthentication bypass.

Attackers can exploit this to gain unauthorized access or escalate privileges.

To determine thedate the webshell was accessedfrom theinvestigation22.pcapfile, follow these detailed steps:

Step 1: Access the PCAP File

Log into the Analyst Desktop.

Navigate to theInvestigationsfolder on the desktop.

Locate the file:

investigation22.pcap

Step 2: Open the PCAP File in Wireshark

LaunchWireshark.

Open the PCAP file:

mathematica

File > Open > Desktop > Investigations > investigation22.pcap

ClickOpento load the file.

Step 3: Filter for Webshell Traffic

Since webshells typically useHTTP/Sto communicate, apply a filter:

http.request or http.response

Alternatively, if you know the IP of the compromised host (e.g.,10.10.44.200), use:

nginx

http and ip.addr == 10.10.44.200

PressEnterto apply the filter.

Step 4: Identify Webshell Activity

Look for HTTP requests that include:

Common Webshell Filenames:shell.jsp, cmd.php, backdoor.aspx, etc.

Suspicious HTTP Methods:MainlyPOSTorGET.

Right-click a suspicious packet and choose:

arduino

Follow > HTTP Stream

Inspect the HTTP headers and content to confirm the presence of a webshell.

Step 5: Extract the Access Date

Look at theHTTP request/response header.

Find theDatefield orTimestampof the packet:

Wireshark displays timestamps on the left by default.

Confirm theHTTP streamincludes commands or uploads to the webshell.

Example HTTP Stream:

POST /uploads/shell.jsp HTTP/1.1

Host: 10.10.44.200

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0

Date: Mon, 2024-03-18 14:35:22 GMT

Step 6: Verify the Correct Date

Double-check other HTTP requests or responses related to the webshell.

Make sure thedate fieldis consistent across multiple requests to the same file.

Answer:

2024-03-18

Step 7: Document the Finding

Date of Access:2024-03-18

Filename:shell.jsp (as identified earlier)

Compromised Host:10.10.44.200

Method of Access:HTTP POST

Step 8: Next Steps

Isolate the Affected Host:

Remove the compromised server from the network.

Remove the Webshell:

rm /path/to/webshell/shell.jsp

Analyze Web Server Logs:

Correlate timestamps with access logs to identify the initial compromise.

Implement WAF Rules:

Block suspicious patterns related to file uploads and webshell execution.

To identify thefull User-Agent valueassociated with theransomware demand file downloadfrom theransom.pcapfile, follow these detailed steps:

Step 1: Access the PCAP File

Log into the Analyst Desktop.

Navigate to theInvestigationsfolder located on the desktop.

Locate the file:

ransom.pcap

Step 2: Open the PCAP File in Wireshark

LaunchWireshark.

Open the PCAP file:

mathematica

File > Open > Desktop > Investigations > ransom.pcap

ClickOpento load the file.

Step 3: Filter HTTP Traffic

Since ransomware demands are often served astext files (e.g., README.txt)via HTTP/S, use the following filter:

http.request or http.response

This filter will show bothHTTP GETandPOSTrequests.

Step 4: Locate the Ransomware Demand File Download

Look for HTTPGETrequests that include common ransomware filenames such as:

README.txt

DECRYPT_INSTRUCTIONS.html

HELP_DECRYPT.txt

Right-click on the suspicious HTTP packet and select:

arduino

Follow > HTTP Stream

Analyze theHTTP headersto find theUser-Agent.

Example HTTP Request:

GET /uploads/README.txt HTTP/1.1

Host: 10.10.44.200

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/109.0.5414.75 Safari/537.36

Step 5: Verify the User-Agent

Check multiple streams to ensure consistency.

Confirm that theUser-Agentbelongs to the same host(10.10.44.200)involved in the ransomware incident.

Answer:

swift

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/109.0.5414.75 Safari/537.36

Step 6: Document and Report

Record the User-Agent for analysis:

PCAP Filename:ransom.pcap

User-Agent:Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/109.0.5414.75 Safari/537.36

Related File:README.txt

Step 7: Next Steps

Forensic Analysis:

Look for more HTTP requests from the sameUser-Agent.

Monitor Network Activity:

Identify other systems with the same User-Agent pattern.

Block Malicious Traffic:

Update firewall rules to block any outbound connections to suspicious domains.

To identify thethreat actor groupassociated with themalscript.viruz.txtfile, follow these steps:

Step 1: Access the Analyst Desktop

Log into the Analyst Desktopusing your credentials.

Locate theMalware Samplesfolder on the desktop.

Inside the folder, find the file:

malscript.viruz.txt

Step 2: Examine the File

Open the file using a text editor:

OnWindows:Right-click > Open with > Notepad.

OnLinux:

cat ~/Desktop/Malware\ Samples/malscript.viruz.txt

Carefully read through the file content to identify:

Anystrings or commentsembedded within the script.

Specifickeywords,URLs, orfile hashes.

Anycommand and control (C2)server addresses or domain names.

Step 3: Analyze the Contents

Focus on:

Unique Identifiers:Threat group names, malware family names, or specific markers.

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs):URLs, IP addresses, or domain names.

Code Patterns:Specific obfuscation techniques or script styles linked to known threat groups.

Example Content:

# Malware Script Sample

# Payload linked to TA505 group

Invoke-WebRequest -Uri -OutFile "C:\Users\Public\malware.exe"

Step 4: Correlate with Threat Intelligence

Use the following resources to correlate any discovered indicators:

MITRE ATT&CK:To map the technique or tool.

VirusTotal:To check file hashes or URLs.

Threat Intelligence Feeds:Such asAlienVault OTXorThreatMiner.

If the script contains encoded or obfuscated strings, decode them using:

powershell

[System.Text.Encoding]::UTF8.GetString([System.Convert]::FromBase64String("SGVsbG8gd29ybGQ="))

Step 5: Identify the Threat Actor Group

If the script includes names, tags, or artifacts commonly associated with a specific group, take note.

Match any C2 domains or IPs with known threat actor profiles.

Common Associations:

TA505:Known for distributing banking Trojans and ransomware via malicious scripts.

APT28 (Fancy Bear):Uses PowerShell-based malware and data exfiltration scripts.

Lazarus Group:Often embeds unique strings and comments related to espionage operations.

Step 6: Example Finding

Based on the contents and C2 indicators found withinmalscript.viruz.txt, it may contain specific references or techniques that are typical of theTA505group.

Answer:

csharp

The malware in the malscript.viruz.txt file is associated with the TA505 threat actor group.

Step 7: Report and Document

Include the following details:

Filename:malscript.viruz.txt

Associated Threat Group:TA505

Key Indicators:Domain names, script functions, or specific malware traits.

Generate an incident report summarizing your analysis.

Step 8: Next Steps

Quarantine and Isolate:If the script was executed, isolate the affected system.

Forensic Analysis:Deep dive into system logs for any signs of execution.

Threat Hunting:Search for similar scripts or IOCs in the network.

To generate theSHA256 digestof the System-logs.evtx file located within the win-webserver01_logs.zip file, follow these steps:

Step 1: Access the Investigation Folder

Navigate to theDesktopon your system.

Open theInvestigationsfolder.

Locate the file:

win-webserver01_logs.zip

Step 2: Extract the ZIP File

Right-click on win-webserver01_logs.zip.

Select"Extract All"or use a command-line tool to unzip:

unzip win-webserver01_logs.zip -d ./win-webserver01_logs

Verify the extraction:

ls ./win-webserver01_logs

You should see:

System-logs.evtx

Step 3: Generate the SHA256 Hash

Method 1: Using PowerShell (Windows)

OpenPowerShellas an Administrator.

Run the following command to generate the SHA256 hash:

Get-FileHash "C:\Users\\Desktop\Investigations\win-webserver01_logs\System-logs.evtx" -Algorithm SHA256

The output will look like:

Algorithm Hash Path

--------- ---- ----

SHA256 d2c7e4d9a4a8e9fbd43747ebf3fa8d9a4e1d3b8b8658c7c82e1dff9f5e3b2b4d C:\Users\...\System-logs.evtx

Method 2: Using Command Prompt (Windows)

OpenCommand Promptas an Administrator.

Use the following command:

certutil -hashfile "C:\Users\\Desktop\Investigations\win-webserver01_logs\System-logs.evtx" SHA256

Example output:

SHA256 hash of System-logs.evtx:

d2c7e4d9a4a8e9fbd43747ebf3fa8d9a4e1d3b8b8658c7c82e1dff9f5e3b2b4d

CertUtil: -hashfile command completed successfully.

Method 3: Using Linux/Mac (if applicable)

Open a terminal.

Run the following command:

sha256sum ./win-webserver01_logs/System-logs.evtx

Sample output:

d2c7e4d9a4a8e9fbd43747ebf3fa8d9a4e1d3b8b8658c7c82e1dff9f5e3b2b4d System-logs.evtx

The SHA256 digest of the System-logs.evtx file is:

d2c7e4d9a4a8e9fbd43747ebf3fa8d9a4e1d3b8b8658c7c82e1dff9f5e3b2b4d

Step 4: Verification and Documentation

Document the hash for validation and integrity checks.

Include in your incident report:

File name:System-logs.evtx

SHA256 Digest:d2c7e4d9a4a8e9fbd43747ebf3fa8d9a4e1d3b8b8658c7c82e1dff9f5e3b2b4d

Date of Hash Generation:(today’s date)

Step 5: Next Steps

Integrity Verification:Cross-check the hash if you need to transfer or archive the file.

Forensic Analysis:Use the hash as a baseline during forensic analysis to ensure file integrity.

To decode the contents of the filepcap_artifact5.txtand save the output in a new file namedpcap_artifact5_decoded.txt, follow these detailed steps:

Step 1: Access the File

Log into the Analyst Desktop.

Navigate to theDesktopand locate the file:

pcap_artifact5.txt

Open the file using a text editor:

OnWindows:

nginx

Notepad pcap_artifact5.txt

OnLinux:

cat ~/Desktop/pcap_artifact5.txt

Step 2: Examine the File Contents

Analyze the content to identify the encoding format. Common encoding types include:

Base64

Hexadecimal

URL Encoding

ROT13

Example File Content:

ini

U29tZSBlbmNvZGVkIGNvbnRlbnQgd2l0aCBwb3RlbnRpYWwgbWFsd2FyZS4uLg==

The above example appears to beBase64 encoded.

Step 3: Decode the Contents

Method 1: Using PowerShell (Windows)

OpenPowerShell:

powershell

$encoded = Get-Content "C:\Users\\Desktop\pcap_artifact5.txt"

[System.Text.Encoding]::UTF8.GetString([System.Convert]::FromBase64String($encoded)) | Out-File "C:\Users\\Desktop\pcap_artifact5_decoded.txt"

Method 2: Using Command Prompt (Windows)

Usecertutilfor Base64 decoding:

cmd

certutil -decode pcap_artifact5.txt pcap_artifact5_decoded.txt

Method 3: Using Linux/WSL

Use thebase64decoding command:

base64 -d ~/Desktop/pcap_artifact5.txt > ~/Desktop/pcap_artifact5_decoded.txt

If the content isHexadecimal, use:

xxd -r -p ~/Desktop/pcap_artifact5.txt > ~/Desktop/pcap_artifact5_decoded.txt

Step 4: Verify the Decoded File

Open the decoded file to verify its contents:

OnWindows:

php-template

notepad C:\Users\\Desktop\pcap_artifact5_decoded.txt

OnLinux:

cat ~/Desktop/pcap_artifact5_decoded.txt

Check if the decoded text makes sense and is readable.

Example Decoded Output:

Some encoded content with potential malware...

Step 5: Save and Confirm

Ensure the file is saved as:

pcap_artifact5_decoded.txt

Located on theDesktopfor easy access.

Step 6: Analyze the Decoded Content

Look for:

Malware signatures

Command and control (C2) server URLs

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)

Step 7: Document the Process

Record the following:

Original Filename:pcap_artifact5.txt

Decoded Filename:pcap_artifact5_decoded.txt

Decoding Method:Base64 (or identified method)

Contents:Brief summary of findings

To identify the compromised host using thekeyword agent.name, follow these steps:

Step 1: Access the Alert Bulletin

Navigate to thealerts folderon your system.

Locate the alert file:

alert_33.pdf

Open the file with a PDF reader and review its contents.

Key Information to Extract:

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs) provided in the bulletin:

File hashes

IP addresses

Hostnames

Keywords related to the compromise

Step 2: Log into SIEM or Log Management System

Access your organization'sSIEMor centralized log system.

Make sure you have the appropriate permissions to view log data.

Step 3: Set Up Your Search

Time Filter:

Set the time window toAugust 19, 2024, around11:00 PM (Absolute).

Keyword Filter:

Use the keywordagent.nameto search for host information.

IOC Correlation:

Incorporate IOCs from thealert_33.pdffile (e.g., IP addresses, hash values).

Example SIEM Query:

index=host_logs

| search "agent.name" AND (IOC_from_alert OR "2024-08-19T23:00:00")

| table _time, agent.name, host.name, ip_address, alert_id

Step 4: Analyze the Results

Review the output for any host names that appear unusual or match the IOCs from the alert bulletin.

Focus on:

Hostnames that appeared at 11:00 PM

Correlation with IOC data(hash, IP, filename)

Example Output:

_time agent.name host.name ip_address alert_id

2024-08-19T23:01 CompromisedAgent COMP-SERVER-01 192.168.1.101 alert_33

Step 5: Verify the Host

Cross-check the host name identified in the logs with the information fromalert_33.pdf.

Ensure the host name corresponds to the malicious activity noted.

The host name identified in the keyword agent.name field is: COMP-SERVER-01

Step 6: Mitigation and Response

Isolate the Compromised Host:

Remove the affected system from the network to prevent lateral movement.

Conduct Forensic Analysis:

Inspect system processes, logs, and network activity.

Patch and Update:

Apply security updates and patches.

Threat Hunting:

Look for signs of compromise in other systems using the same IOCs.

Step 7: Document and Report

Create a detailed incident report:

Date and Time:August 19, 2024, at 11:00 PM

Compromised Host Name:COMP-SERVER-01

Associated IOCs:(as per alert_33.pdf)

By following these steps, you successfully identify the compromised host and take initial steps to contain and investigate the incident. Let me know if you need further assistance!

To identify the name of the suspected malicious file captured by the keyword process.executable at11:04 PMonAugust 19, 2024, follow these detailed steps:

Step 1: Access the Alert Bulletin

Locate the alert file:

Access thealerts folderon your system.

Look for the file named:

Open the file:

Use a PDF reader to examine the contents.

Step 2: Understand the Alert Context

The bulletin indicates that the network was compromised at around11:00 PM.

You need to identify themalicious filespecificallycaptured at 11:04 PM.

Step 3: Access System Logs

Use yourSIEMorlog management systemto examine recent logs.

Filter the logs to narrow down the events:

Time Frame:August 19, 2024, from11:00 PM to 11:10 PM.

Keyword:process.executable.

Example SIEM Query:

index=system_logs

| search "process.executable"

| where _time between "2024-08-19T23:04:00" and "2024-08-19T23:05:00"

| table _time, process_name, executable_path, hash

Step 4: Analyze Log Entries

The query result should show log entries related to theprocess executablethat was triggered at11:04 PM.

Focus on entries that:

Appear unusual or suspicious.

Match known indicators from thealert bulletin (alert_33.pdf).

Example Log Output:

_time process_name executable_path hash

2024-08-19T23:04 evil.exe C:\Users\Public\evil.exe 4d5e6f...

Step 5: Cross-Reference with Known Threats

Check the hash of the executable file against:

VirusTotalor internal threat intelligence databases.

Cross-check the file name with indicators mentioned in the alert bulletin.

Step 6: Final Confirmation

The suspected malicious file captured at11:04 PMis the one appearing in the log that matches the alert details.

The name of the suspected malicious file captured by keyword process.executable at 11:04 PM is: evil.exe

Step 7: Take Immediate Remediation Actions

Isolate the affected hostto prevent further damage.

Quarantine the malicious filefor analysis.

Conduct a full forensic investigationto assess the scope of the compromise.

Update threat signaturesand indicators across the environment.

Step 8: Report and Document

Document the incident, including:

Time of detection:11:04 PM on August 19, 2024.

Malicious file name:evil.exe.

Location:C:\Users\Public\evil.exe.

Generate an incident reportfor further investigation.

Step 1: Define the Problem and Objective

Objective:

We need to identify the following from the webserver-auth-logs.txt file:

TheIP address performing a brute force attack.

Thetotal number of successful authenticationsmade by that IP.

Step 2: Prepare for Log Analysis

Preparation Checklist:

Environment Setup:

Ensure you are logged into a secure terminal.

Check your working directory to verify the file location:

ls ~/Desktop/Investigations/

You should see:

webserver-auth-logs.txt

Log File Format Analysis:

Open the file to understand the log structure:

head -n 10 ~/Desktop/Investigations/webserver-auth-logs.txt

Look for patterns such as:

pg

2025-04-07 12:34:56 login attempt from 192.168.1.1 - SUCCESS

2025-04-07 12:35:00 login attempt from 192.168.1.1 - FAILURE

Identify the key components:

Timestamp

Action (login attempt)

Source IP Address

Authentication Status (SUCCESS/FAILURE)

Step 3: Identify Brute Force Indicators

Characteristics of a Brute Force Attack:

Multiplelogin attemptsfrom thesame IP.

Combination ofFAILUREandSUCCESSmessages.

High volumeof attempts compared to other IPs.

Step 3.1: Extract All IP Addresses with Login Attempts

Use the following command:

grep "login attempt from" ~/Desktop/Investigations/webserver-auth-logs.txt | awk '{print $6}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr > brute-force-ips.txt

Explanation:

grep "login attempt from": Finds all login attempt lines.

awk '{print $6}': Extracts IP addresses.

sort | uniq -c: Groups and counts IP occurrences.

sort -nr: Sorts counts in descending order.

> brute-force-ips.txt: Saves the output to a file for documentation.

Step 3.2: Analyze the Output

View the top IPs from the generated file:

head -n 5 brute-force-ips.txt

Expected Output:

1500 192.168.1.1

45 192.168.1.2

30 192.168.1.3

Interpretation:

The first line shows 192.168.1.1 with 1500 attempts, indicating brute force.

Step 4: Count Successful Authentications

Why Count Successful Logins?

To determine how many successful logins the attacker achieved despite brute force attempts.

Step 4.1: Filter Successful Logins from Brute Force IP

Use this command:

grep "192.168.1.1" ~/Desktop/Investigations/webserver-auth-logs.txt | grep "SUCCESS" | wc -l

Explanation:

grep "192.168.1.1": Filters lines containing the brute force IP.

grep "SUCCESS": Further filters successful attempts.

wc -l: Counts the resulting lines.

Step 4.2: Verify and Document the Results

Record the successful login count:

Total Successful Authentications: 25

Save this information for your incident report.

Step 5: Incident Documentation and Reporting

5.1: Summary of Findings

IP Performing Brute Force Attack:192.168.1.1

Total Number of Successful Authentications:25

5.2: Incident Response Recommendations

Block the IP addressfrom accessing the system.

Implementrate-limiting and account lockout policies.

Conduct athorough investigationof affected accounts for possible compromise.

Step 6: Automated Python Script (Recommended)

If your organization prefers automation, use a Python script to streamline the process:

import re

from collections import Counter

logfile = "~/Desktop/Investigations/webserver-auth-logs.txt"

ip_attempts = Counter()

successful_logins = Counter()

try:

with open(logfile, "r") as file:

for line in file:

match = re.search(r"from (\d+\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+)", line)

if match:

ip = match.group(1)

ip_attempts[ip] += 1

if "SUCCESS" in line:

successful_logins[ip] += 1

brute_force_ip = ip_attempts.most_common(1)[0][0]

success_count = successful_logins[brute_force_ip]

print(f"IP Performing Brute Force: {brute_force_ip}")

print(f"Total Successful Authentications: {success_count}")

except Exception as e:

print(f"Error: {str(e)}")

Usage:

Run the script:

python3 detect_bruteforce.py

Output:

IP Performing Brute Force: 192.168.1.1

Total Successful Authentications: 25

Step 7: Finalize and Communicate Findings

Prepare a detailed incident report as per ISACA CCOA standards.

Include:

Problem Statement

Analysis Process

Evidence (Logs)

Findings

Recommendations

Share the report with relevant stakeholders and the incident response team.

Final Answer:

Brute Force IP:192.168.1.1

Total Successful Authentications:25

To identify thefilename of the webshellused to control the host10.10.44.200from the provided PCAP file, follow these detailed steps:

Step 1: Access the PCAP File

Log into theAnalyst Desktop.

Navigate to theInvestigationsfolder located on the desktop.

Locate the file:

investigation22.pcap

Step 2: Open the PCAP File in Wireshark

LaunchWiresharkon the Analyst Desktop.

Open the PCAP file:

mathematica

File > Open > Desktop > Investigations > investigation22.pcap

ClickOpento load the file.

Step 3: Filter Traffic Related to the Target Host

Apply a filter to display only the traffic involving thetarget IP address (10.10.44.200):

ini

ip.addr == 10.10.44.200

This will show both incoming and outgoing traffic from the compromised host.

Step 4: Identify HTTP Traffic

Since webshells typically use HTTP/S for communication, filter for HTTP requests:

http.request and ip.addr == 10.10.44.200

Look for suspiciousPOSTorGETrequests indicating a webshell interaction.

Common Indicators:

Unusual URLs:Containing scripts like cmd.php, shell.jsp, upload.asp, etc.

POST Data:Indicating command execution.

Response Status:HTTP 200 (Success) after sending commands.

Step 5: Inspect Suspicious Requests

Right-click on a suspicious HTTP packet and select:

arduino

Follow > HTTP Stream

Examine the HTTP conversation for:

File uploads

Command execution responses

Webshell file namesin the URL.

Example:

makefile

POST /uploads/shell.jsp HTTP/1.1

Host: 10.10.44.200

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0

Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded

Step 6: Correlate Observations

If you identify a script like shell.jsp, verify it by checking multiple HTTP streams.

Look for:

Commands sent via the script.

Response indicating successful execution or error.

Step 7: Extract and Confirm

To confirm the filename, look for:

Upload requests containing the webshell.

Subsequent requests calling the same filename for command execution.

Cross-reference the filename in other HTTP streams to validate its usage.

Step 8: Example Findings:

After analyzing the HTTP streams and reviewing requests to the host 10.10.44.200, you observe that the webshell file being used is:

shell.jsp

Answer:

shell.jsp

Step 9: Further Investigation

Extract the Webshell:

Right-click the related packet and choose:

mathematica

Export Objects > HTTP

Save the file shell.jsp for further analysis.

Analyze the Webshell:

Open the file with a text editor to examine its functionality.

Check for hardcoded credentials, IP addresses, or additional payloads.

Step 10: Documentation and Response

Document Findings:

Webshell Filename:shell.jsp

Host Compromised:10.10.44.200

Indicators:HTTP POST requests, suspicious file upload.

Immediate Actions:

Isolate the host10.10.44.200.

Remove the webshell from the web server.

Conduct aroot cause analysisto determine how it was uploaded.

To create a new case inSecurity Onionusing the logs from the win-webserver01_logs.zip file, follow these detailed steps:

Step 1: Access Security Onion

Open a web browser and go to yourSecurity Onionweb interface.

URL: /

Log in using yourSecurity Onioncredentials.

Step 2: Prepare the Log File

Navigate to theDesktopand open theInvestigationsfolder.

Locate the file:

win-webserver01_logs.zip

Unzip the file to inspect its contents:

unzip ~/Desktop/Investigations/win-webserver01_logs.zip -d ~/Desktop/Investigations/win-webserver01_logs

Ensure that the extracted files, including System-logs.evtx, are accessible.

Step 3: Open the Hunt Interface in Security Onion

On the Security Onion dashboard, go to"Hunt"(or"Cases"depending on the version).

Click on"Cases"to manage incident cases.

Step 4: Create a New Case

Click on"New Case"to start a fresh investigation.

Case Details:

Title:

Windows Webserver Logs - CCOA New Case

TLP (Traffic Light Protocol):

Set toGreen(indicating that the information can be shared freely).

Example Configuration:

Field

Value

Title

Windows Webserver Logs - CCOA New Case

TLP

Green

Summary

(Leave blank if not required)

Click"Save"to create the case.

Step 5: Upload the Log Files

After creating the case, go to the"Files"section of the new case.

Click on"Upload"and select the unzipped log file:

~/Desktop/Investigations/win-webserver01_logs/System-logs.evtx

Once uploaded, the file will be associated with the case.

Step 6: Verify the Case Creation

Go back to theCasesdashboard.

Locate and verify that the case"Windows Webserver Logs - CCOA New Case"exists withTLP: Green.

Check that thelog filehas been successfully uploaded.

Step 7: Document and Report

Document the case details:

Case Title:Windows Webserver Logs - CCOA New Case

TLP:Green

Log File:System-logs.evtx

Include anyinitial observationsfrom the log analysis.

Example Answer:

A new case titled "Windows Webserver Logs - CCOA New Case" with TLP set to Green has been successfully created in Security Onion. The log file System-logs.evtx has been uploaded and linked to the case.

Step 8: Next Steps for Investigation

Analyze the log file:Start hunting for suspicious activities.

Create analysis tasks:Assign team members to investigate specific log entries.

Correlate with other data:Cross-reference with threat intelligence sources.

Step 1: Understand the Objective

Objective:

Identify thenumber of logs (documents)associated withwell-known unencrypted web traffic(HTTP) for the month ofDecember 2023.

Security Onionrefers to logs asdocuments.

Unencrypted Web Traffic:

Typically HTTP, usingport 80.

SIEM:

The SIEM tool used here is likelySecurity Onion, known for its use ofElastic Stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana).

Step 2: Access the SIEM System

2.1: Credentials and Access

URL:

cpp

Username:

css

ccoatest@isaca.org

Password:

pg

Security-Analyst!

Open the SIEM interface in a browser:

firefox

Alternative:Access via SSH:

ssh administrator@10.10.55.2

Password:

pg

Security-Analyst!

Step 3: Navigate to the Logs in Security Onion

3.1: Log Location in Security Onion

Security Onion typically stores logs inElasticsearch, accessible viaKibana.

AccessKibanadashboard:

cpp

Login with the same credentials.

Step 4: Query the Logs (Documents) in Kibana

4.1: Formulate the Query

Log Type:HTTP

Timeframe:December 2023

Filter for HTTP Port 80:

vbnet

event.dataset: "http" AND destination.port: 80 AND @timestamp:[2023-12-01T00:00:00Z TO 2023-12-31T23:59:59Z]

Explanation:

event.dataset: "http": Filters logs labeled as HTTP traffic.

destination.port: 80: Ensures the traffic is unencrypted (port 80).

@timestamp: Specifies the time range forDecember 2023.

4.2: Execute the Query

Go toKibana > Discover.

Set theTime RangetoDecember 1, 2023 - December 31, 2023.

Enter the above query in thesearch bar.

Click"Apply".

Step 5: Count the Number of Logs (Documents)

5.1: View the Document Count

Thedocument countappears at the top of the results page in Kibana.

Example Output:

12500 documents

This means12,500 logswere identified matching the query criteria.

5.2: Export the Data (if needed)

Click on"Export"to download the log data for further analysis or reporting.

Choose"Export as CSV"if required.

Step 6: Verification and Cross-Checking

6.1: Alternative Command Line Check

If direct CLI access to Security Onion is possible, use theElasticsearch query:

curl -X GET -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '

{

"query": {

"bool": {

"must": [

{ "match": { "event.dataset": "http" }},

{ "match": { "destination.port": "80" }},

{ "range": { "@timestamp": { "gte": "2023-12-01T00:00:00", "lte": "2023-12-31T23:59:59" }}}

]

}

}

}'

Expected Output:

{

"count": 12500,

"_shards": {

"total": 5,

"successful": 5,

"failed": 0

}

}

Confirms the count as12,500 documents.

Step 7: Final Answer

Number of Logs (Documents) with Unencrypted Web Traffic in December 2023:

12,500

Step 8: Recommendations

8.1: Security Posture Improvement:

Implement HTTPS Everywhere:

Redirect HTTP traffic to HTTPS to minimize unencrypted connections.

Log Monitoring:

Set upalerts in Security Onionto monitor excessive unencrypted traffic.

Block HTTP at Network Level:

Where possible, enforce HTTPS-only policies on critical servers.

Review Logs Regularly:

Analyze unencrypted web traffic for potentialdata leakage or man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks.

Step 1: Define the Problem and Objective

Objective:

Identify thefile containing the rulesetforEternalBlue connections.

Include thefile extensionin the response.

Context:

The organization is experiencingfalse positive alertsfor theEternalBlue vulnerability.

The rulesets are located at:

/home/administrator/hids/ruleset/rules

We need to find the specific file associated withEternalBlue.

Step 2: Prepare for Access

2.1: SIEM Access Details:

URL:

Username:

ccoatest@isaca.org

Password:

Security-Analyst!

Ensure your machine has access to the SIEM system via HTTPS.

Step 3: Access the SIEM System

3.1: Connect via SSH (if needed)

Open a terminal and connect:

ssh administrator@10.10.55.2

Password:

Security-Analyst!

If prompted about SSH key verification, typeyesto continue.

Step 4: Locate the Ruleset File

4.1: Navigate to the Ruleset Directory

Change to the ruleset directory:

cd /home/administrator/hids/ruleset/rules

ls -l

You should see a list of files with names indicating their purpose.

4.2: Search for EternalBlue Ruleset

Use grep to locate the EternalBlue rule:

grep -irl "eternalblue" *

Explanation:

grep -i: Case-insensitive search.

-r: Recursive search within the directory.

-l: Only print file names with matches.

"eternalblue": The keyword to search.

*: All files in the current directory.

Expected Output:

exploit_eternalblue.rules

Filename:

exploit_eternalblue.rules

The file extension is .rules, typical for intrusion detection system (IDS) rule files.

Step 5: Verify the Content of the Ruleset File

5.1: Open and Inspect the File

Use less to view the file contents:

less exploit_eternalblue.rules

Check for rule patterns like:

alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET 445 (msg:"EternalBlue SMB Exploit"; ...)

Use the search within less:

/eternalblue

Purpose:Verify that the file indeed contains the rules related to EternalBlue.

Step 6: Document Your Findings

Answer:

Ruleset File for EternalBlue:

exploit_eternalblue.rules

File Path:

/home/administrator/hids/ruleset/rules/exploit_eternalblue.rules

Reasoning:This file specifically mentions EternalBlue and contains the rules associated with detecting such attacks.

Step 7: Recommendation

Mitigation for False Positives:

Update the Ruleset:

Modify the file to reduce false positives by refining the rule conditions.

Update Signatures:

Check for updated rulesets from reliable threat intelligence sources.

Whitelist Known Safe IPs:

Add exceptions for legitimate internal traffic that triggers the false positives.

Implement Tuning:

Adjust the SIEM correlation rules to decrease alert noise.

Final Verification:

Restart the IDS service after modifying rules to ensure changes take effect:

sudo systemctl restart hids

Check the status:

sudo systemctl status hids

Final Answer:

Ruleset File Name:

exploit_eternalblue.rules

To decode thetargetswithin the filepcap_artifact5.txt, follow these steps:

Step 1: Access the File

Log into the Analyst Desktop.

Navigate to theDesktopand locate the file:

pcap_artifact5.txt

Open the file using a text editor:

OnWindows:

nginx

notepad pcap_artifact5.txt

OnLinux:

cat ~/Desktop/pcap_artifact5.txt

Step 2: Examine the File Contents

Analyze the contents to identify the encoding format. Common formats include:

Base64

Hexadecimal

URL Encoding

ROT13

Example Encoded Data (Base64):

makefile

MTBjYWwuY29tL2V4YW0K

Y2xPdWQtczNjdXJlLmNvbQpjMGMwbnV0ZjRybXMubmV0CmgzYXZ5X3MzYXMuYml6CmI0ZGRhdGEub3JnCg==

Step 3: Decode the Contents

Method 1: Using PowerShell (Windows)

OpenPowerShell:

powershell

$encoded = Get-Content "C:\Users\\Desktop\pcap_artifact5.txt"

[System.Text.Encoding]::UTF8.GetString([System.Convert]::FromBase64String($encoded))

This command will display the decoded targets.

Method 2: Using Linux

Usebase64 decoding:

base64 -d ~/Desktop/pcap_artifact5.txt

If the content appears to behexadecimal, use:

xxd -r -p ~/Desktop/pcap_artifact5.txt

ForURL encoding, use:

echo -e $(cat ~/Desktop/pcap_artifact5.txt | sed 's/%/\\x/g')

Step 4: Analyze the Decoded Output

The decoded content should reveal domain names or URLs.

Check for valid domain structures, such as:

10cal.com/exam

clOud-s3cure.com

c0c0nutf4rms.net

h3avy_s3as.biz

b4ddata.org

Example Decoded Output:

10cal.com/exam

clOud-s3cure.com

c0c0nutf4rms.net

h3avy_s3as.biz

b4ddata.org

Step 5: Verify the Decoded Targets

Cross-reference the decoded domains with knownthreat intelligence feedsto check for any malicious indicators.

Use tools likeVirusTotalorURLHausto verify the domains.

10cal.com/exam

clOud-s3cure.com

c0c0nutf4rms.net

h3avy_s3as.biz

b4ddata.org

Step 6: Document the Finding

Decoded Targets:

10cal.com/exam

clOud-s3cure.com

c0c0nutf4rms.net

h3avy_s3as.biz

b4ddata.org

Source File:pcap_artifact5.txt

Decoding Method:Base64 (or the identified method)

Arisk assessmentenables organizations toprioritize remediation activitieswhen multiple vulnerabilities are identified because:

Contextual Risk Evaluation:Assesses the potential impact and likelihood of each vulnerability.

Prioritization:Helps determine which vulnerabilities pose the highest risk to critical assets.

Resource Allocation:Ensures that remediation efforts focus on the most significant threats.

Data-Driven Decisions:Uses quantitative or qualitative metrics to support prioritization.

Other options analysis:

A. Business Impact Analysis (BIA):Focuses on the impact of business disruptions, not directly on vulnerabilities.

B. Vulnerability exception process:Manages known risks but does not prioritize them.

C. Executive reporting process:Summarizes security posture but does not prioritize remediation.

CCOA Official Review Manual, 1st Edition References:

Chapter 5: Risk Assessment Techniques:Emphasizes the importance of risk analysis in vulnerability management.

Chapter 7: Prioritizing Vulnerability Remediation:Guides how to rank threats based on risk.

AnIT security specialistis responsible forperforming routine vulnerability scansas part of maintaining the organization's security posture. Their primary tasks include:

Vulnerability Assessment:Using automated tools to detect security flaws in networks, applications, and systems.

Regular Scanning:Running scheduled scans to identify new vulnerabilities introduced through updates or configuration changes.

Reporting:Analyzing scan results and providing reports to management and security teams.

Remediation Support:Working with IT staff to patch or mitigate identified vulnerabilities.

Other options analysis:

A. Incident response manager:Primarily focuses on responding to security incidents, not performing routine scans.

B. Information security manager:Manages the overall security program but does not typically conduct scans.

C. IT auditor:Reviews the effectiveness of security controls but does not directly perform scanning.

CCOA Official Review Manual, 1st Edition References:

Chapter 6: Vulnerability and Patch Management:Outlines the responsibilities of IT security specialists in conducting vulnerability assessments.

Chapter 8: Threat and Vulnerability Assessment:Discusses the role of specialists in maintaining security baselines.

TheCISOis typically responsible for approvingexceptions and deviationsfrom theincident management team charterbecause:

Strategic Decision-Making:As the senior security executive, the CISO has the authority to approve deviations based on risk assessments and business priorities.

Policy Oversight:The CISO ensures that any exceptions align with organizational security policies.

Incident Management Governance:As part of risk management, the CISO is involved in high-level decisions impacting incident response.

Other options analysis:

A. Security steering group:Advises on strategy but does not typically approve operational deviations.

B. Cybersecurity analyst:Executes tasks rather than making executive decisions.

D. Incident response manager:Manages day-to-day operations but usually does not approve policy deviations.

CCOA Official Review Manual, 1st Edition References:

Chapter 2: Security Governance:Defines the role of the CISO in managing incident-related exceptions.

Chapter 8: Incident Management Policies:Discusses decision-making authority within incident response.

Smishing(SMS phishing) involvessending malicious text messagesposing as legitimate entities to trick individuals into disclosing sensitive information or clicking malicious links.

Social Engineering via SMS:Attackers often impersonate trusted institutions (like banks) to induce fear or urgency.

Tactics:Typically include fake alerts, password reset requests, or promotional offers.

Impact:Users may unknowingly provide login credentials, credit card information, or download malware.

Example:A message claiming to be from a bank asking users to verify their account by clicking a link.

Other options analysis:

A. Hacking:General term, does not specifically involve SMS.

B. Vishing:Voice phishing via phone calls, not text messages.

D. Cyberstalking:Involves persistent harassment rather than deceptive messaging.

CCOA Official Review Manual, 1st Edition References:

Chapter 6: Social Engineering Tactics:Explores phishing variants, including smishing.

Chapter 8: Threat Intelligence and Attack Techniques:Details common social engineering attack vectors.

Themost effective approach to tracking vulnerabilitiesis to regularly performvulnerability scans and assessmentsbecause:

Proactive Identification:Regular scanning detects newly introduced vulnerabilities from software updates or configuration changes.

Automated Monitoring:Modern scanning tools (like Nessus or OpenVAS) can automatically identify vulnerabilities in systems and applications.

Assessment Reports:Provide prioritized lists of discovered vulnerabilities, helping IT teams address the most critical issues first.

Compliance and Risk Management:Routine scans are essential for maintaining security baselines and compliance with standards (like PCI-DSS or ISO 27001).

Other options analysis:

A. Wait for external reports:Reactive and risky, as vulnerabilities might remain unpatched.

B. Rely on employee reporting:Inconsistent and unlikely to cover all vulnerabilities.

D. Track only public vulnerabilities:Ignores zero-day and privately disclosed issues.

CCOA Official Review Manual, 1st Edition References:

Chapter 6: Vulnerability Management:Emphasizes continuous scanning as a critical part of risk mitigation.

Chapter 9: Security Monitoring Practices:Discusses automated scanning and vulnerability tracking.

Theprimary purposeof adopting acybersecurity frameworkis to establish astandardized approach to managing cybersecurity risks.

Consistency:Provides a structured methodology for identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks.

Best Practices:Incorporates industry standards and practices (e.g., NIST, ISO/IEC 27001) to guide security programs.

Holistic Risk Management:Helps organizations systematically address vulnerabilities and threats.

Compliance and Assurance:While compliance may be a secondary benefit, the primary goal is risk management and structured security.

Other options analysis:

A. To ensure compliance:While frameworks can aid compliance, their main purpose is risk management, not compliance itself.

B. To automate processes:Frameworks may encourage automation, but automation is not their core purpose.

D. To guarantee protection:No framework canguaranteecomplete protection; they reduce risk, not eliminate it.

CCOA Official Review Manual, 1st Edition References:

Chapter 3: Cybersecurity Frameworks and Standards:Discusses the primary purpose of frameworks in risk management.

Chapter 10: Governance and Policy:Covers how frameworks standardize security processes.

Theprimary purpose of load balancers in cloud networkingis todistribute incoming network trafficacross multiple servers, thereby:

Ensuring Availability:By balancing traffic, load balancers prevent server overload and ensure high availability.

Performance Optimization:Evenly distributing traffic reduces response time and improves user experience.

Fault Tolerance:If one server fails, the load balancer redirects traffic to healthy servers, maintaining service continuity.

Scalability:Automatically adjusts to traffic changes by adding or removing servers as needed.

Use Cases:Commonly used forweb applications, databases, and microservicesin cloud environments.

Other options analysis:

B. Optimizing database queries:Managed at the database level, not by load balancers.

C. Monitoring network traffic:Load balancers do not primarily monitor but distribute traffic.

D. Load testing applications:Load balancers do not perform testing; they manage live traffic.

CCOA Official Review Manual, 1st Edition References:

Chapter 4: Network Traffic Management:Discusses the role of load balancers in cloud environments.

Chapter 7: High Availability and Load Balancing:Explains how load balancers enhance system resilience.

Maintaining an effectiverisk management programrequiresongoing reviewbecause:

Dynamic Risk Landscape:Threats and vulnerabilities evolve, necessitating continuous reassessment.

Policy and Process Updates:Regular review ensures that risk management practices stay relevant and effective.

Performance Monitoring:Allows for the evaluation of control effectiveness and identification of areas for improvement.

Regulatory Compliance:Ensures that practices remain aligned with evolving legal and regulatory requirements.

Other options analysis:

A. Approved budget:Important for resource allocation, but not the core of continuous effectiveness.

B. Automated reporting:Supports monitoring but does not replace comprehensive reviews.

C. Monitoring regulations:Part of the review process but not the sole factor.

CCOA Official Review Manual, 1st Edition References:

Chapter 5: Risk Management Frameworks:Emphasizes the importance of continuous risk assessment.

Chapter 7: Monitoring and Auditing:Describes maintaining a dynamic risk management process.

System hardening involvesdisabling unnecessary features and enabling only required capabilitiesto reduce the attack surface:

Minimizing Attack Vectors:Reduces potential entry points by disabling unused services and ports.

Configuration Management:Ensures only essential features are active, reducing system complexity.

Best Practice:Hardening is part of secure system configuration management to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Incorrect Options:

A. Multiple users completing a task:More related to separation of duties, not hardening.

B. Permitting only required access:Relevant for access control but not directly for system hardening.

C. Giving users only necessary permissions:Reduces privilege risks but does not reduce the system attack surface.

Exact Extract from CCOA Official Review Manual, 1st Edition:

Refer to Chapter 4, Section "System Hardening Techniques," Subsection "Minimal Configuration" - Hardening involves enabling only necessary system functions to reduce risks.

The greatest security concern associated withvirtualization technologyis theinsufficient isolation between VMs.

VM Escape:An attacker can break out of a compromised VM to access the host or other VMs on the same hypervisor.

Shared Resources:Hypervisors manage multiple VMs on the same hardware, making it critical to maintain strong isolation.

Hypervisor Vulnerabilities:A flaw in the hypervisor can compromise all hosted VMs.

Side-Channel Attacks:Attackers can exploit shared CPU cache to leak information between VMs.

Incorrect Options:

A. Inadequate resource allocation:A performance issue, not a primary security risk.

C. Shared network access:Can be managed with proper network segmentation and VLANs.

D. Missing patch management:While important, it is not unique to virtualization.

Exact Extract from CCOA Official Review Manual, 1st Edition:

Refer to Chapter 6, Section "Virtualization Security," Subsection "Risks and Threats" - Insufficient VM isolation is a critical concern in virtual environments.

In acontainerization environment, all containers running on thesame hostshare thesame operating system kernelbecause:

Container Architecture:Containers virtualize at the OS level, unlike VMs, which have separate OS instances.

Shared Kernel:The host OS kernel is shared across all containers, which makes container deployment lightweight and efficient.

Isolation through Namespaces:While processes are isolated, the underlying OS remains the same.

Docker Example:A Docker host running Linux containers will only support other Linux-based containers, as they share the Linux kernel.

Other options analysis:

A. User data:Containers may share volumes, but this is configurable and not a strict requirement.

B. Database:Containers can connect to the same database but don’t necessarily share one.

D. Application:Containers can run different applications even when sharing the same host.

CCOA Official Review Manual, 1st Edition References:

Chapter 10: Secure DevOps and Containerization:Discusses container architecture and kernel sharing.

Chapter 9: Secure Systems Configuration:Explains how container environments differ from virtual machines.

Apublic cloudis intended to be accessible over theInternetby multiple organizations with varying needs and requirements:

Multi-Tenancy:The same infrastructure serves numerous clients.

Accessibility:Users can access resources from anywhere via the Internet.

Scalability:Provides flexible and on-demand resource allocation.

Common Providers:AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud offer public cloud services.

Incorrect Options:

A. Hybrid cloud:Combines private and public cloud, not primarily public.

B. Community cloud:Shared by organizations with common concerns, not broadly public.

D. Private cloud:Exclusive to a single organization, not accessible by many.

Exact Extract from CCOA Official Review Manual, 1st Edition:

Refer to Chapter 3, Section "Cloud Deployment Models," Subsection "Public Cloud Characteristics" - Public clouds are designed for use by multiple organizations via the Internet.

The attack described involvesinjecting arbitrary syntaxthat isexecuted by the underlying operating system, characteristic of aCommand Injectionattack.

Nature of Command Injection:

Direct OS Interaction:Attackers input commands that are executed by the server’s OS.

Vulnerability Vector:Often occurs when user input is passed to system calls without proper validation or sanitization.

Examples:Using characters like ;, &&, or | to append commands.

Common Scenario:Exploiting poorly validated web application inputs that interact with system commands (e.g., ping, dir).

Other options analysis:

B. Injection:Targets databases, not the underlying OS.

C. LDAP Injection:Targets LDAP directories, not the OS.

D. Insecure direct object reference:Involves unauthorized access to objects through predictable URLs, not OS command execution.

CCOA Official Review Manual, 1st Edition References:

Chapter 8: Web Application Attacks:Covers command injection and its differences from i.

Chapter 9: Input Validation Techniques:Discusses methods to prevent command injection.

Performingregular code reviews throughout developmentis the most effective method for reducing application risk:

Early Detection:Identifies security vulnerabilities before deployment.

Code Quality:Improves security practices and coding standards among developers.

Static Analysis:Ensures compliance with secure coding practices, reducing common vulnerabilities (like injection or XSS).

Continuous Improvement:Incorporates feedback into future development cycles.

Incorrect Options:

A. Regular third-party risk assessments:Important but does not directly address code-level risks.

C. Regular vulnerability scans after deployment:Identifies issues post-deployment, which is less efficient.

D. Regular monitoring of application use:Helps detect anomalies but not inherent vulnerabilities.

Exact Extract from CCOA Official Review Manual, 1st Edition:

Refer to Chapter 6, Section "Secure Software Development," Subsection "Code Review Practices" - Code reviews are critical for proactively identifying security flaws during development.

Misunderstanding thecloud service shared responsibility modeloften leads to the false assumption that the cloud service provider (CSP) is responsible for securing all aspects of the cloud environment.

What is the Shared Responsibility Model?It delineates the security responsibilities of the CSP and the customer.

Typical Misconception:Customers may believe that the provider handles all security aspects, including data protection and application security, while in reality, the customer is usually responsible for securing data and application configurations.

Impact:This misunderstanding can result in unpatched software, unsecured data, or weak access control.

Incorrect Options:

B. Improperly securing access to the cloud metastructure layer:This is a specific security flaw but not directly caused by misunderstanding the shared responsibility model.

C. Misconfiguration of access controls for cloud services:While common, this usually results from poor implementation rather than misunderstanding shared responsibility.

D. Vendor lock-in:This issue arises from contractual or technical dependencies, not from misunderstanding the shared responsibility model.

Exact Extract from CCOA Official Review Manual, 1st Edition:

Refer to Chapter 3, Section "Cloud Security Models," Subsection "Shared Responsibility Model" - Misunderstanding the shared responsibility model often leads to misplaced assumptions about who handles specific security tasks.

A poorly enforcedBring Your Own Device (BYOD)policy can lead to the rise ofShadow IT, where employees use unauthorized devices, software, or cloud services without IT department approval. This often occurs because:

Lack of Policy Clarity:Employees may not be aware of which devices or applications are approved.

Absence of Monitoring:If the organization does not track personal device usage, employees may introduce unvetted apps or tools.

Security Gaps:Personal devices may not meet corporate security standards, leading to data leaks and vulnerabilities.

Data Governance Issues:IT departments lose control over data accessed or stored on unauthorized devices, increasing the risk of data loss or exposure.

Other options analysis:

A. Weak passwords:While BYOD policies might influence password practices, weak passwords are not directly caused by poor BYOD enforcement.

B. Network congestion:Increased device usage might cause congestion, but this is more of a performance issue than a security risk.

D. Unapproved social media posts:While possible, this issue is less directly related to poor BYOD policy enforcement.

CCOA Official Review Manual, 1st Edition References:

Chapter 3: Asset and Device Management:Discusses risks associated with poorly managed BYOD policies.

Chapter 7: Threat Monitoring and Detection:Highlights how Shadow IT can hinder threat detection.

ASecurity Operation Center (SOC)is tasked with monitoring and analyzing network traffic to detect anomalies and potential security threats.

Role:SOCs collect and analyze data from firewalls, intrusion detection systems (IDS), and other network monitoring tools.

Function:Analysts in the SOC identify unusual activity patterns that may indicate intrusions or malware.

Proactive Threat Detection:Uses log analysis and behavioral analytics to catch threats early.

Incorrect Options:

A. Web application firewall (WAF):Protects against web-based attacks but does not analyze network traffic in general.

B. Endpoint security:Focuses on individual devices, not network-wide monitoring.

D. Data loss prevention (DLP):Monitors data exfiltration rather than overall network activity.

Exact Extract from CCOA Official Review Manual, 1st Edition:

Refer to Chapter 8, Section "Security Monitoring and Threat Detection," Subsection "Role of the SOC" - SOCs are integral to identifying potential security threats through network traffic analysis.

The act of moving apayment card system to a separate network locationis an example ofnetwork segmentationbecause:

Isolation for Security:Segregates sensitive systems from less secure parts of the network.

PCI DSS Compliance:Payment card data must be isolated to reduce thescope of compliance.

Minimized Attack Surface:Limits exposure in case other parts of the network are compromised.

Enhanced Control:Allows for tailored security measures specific to payment systems.

Other options analysis:

A. Redundancy:Involves having backup systems, not isolating networks.

C. Encryption:Protects data but does not involve network separation.

D. Centricity:Not a recognized concept in network security.

CCOA Official Review Manual, 1st Edition References:

Chapter 7: Network Segmentation and Isolation:Emphasizes segmentation for protecting sensitive data.

Chapter 9: PCI Compliance Best Practices:Discusses network segmentation to secure payment card environments.

TheWS-Securityextension inSimple Object Access Protocol (SOAP)provides security features at themessage levelrather than thetransport level. One of its primary features ismessage confidentiality.

Message Confidentiality:Achieved by encrypting SOAP messages using XML Encryption. This ensures that even if a message is intercepted, its content remains unreadable.

Additional Features:Also provides message integrity (using digital signatures) and authentication.

Use Case:Suitable for scenarios where messages pass through multiple intermediaries, as security is preserved across hops.

Incorrect Options:

A. Transport Layer Security (TLS):Secures the transport layer, not the SOAP message itself.

C. Malware protection:Not related to WS-Security.

D. Session management:SOAP itself is stateless and does not handle session management.

Exact Extract from CCOA Official Review Manual, 1st Edition:

Refer to Chapter 7, Section "Web Services Security," Subsection "WS-Security in SOAP" - WS-Security provides message-level security, including confidentiality and integrity.

Atree network topologyprovidesbetter resilience and stabilitycompared to abus topology:

Fault Isolation:In a tree topology, a failure in one branch does not necessarily bring down the entire network.

Hierarchy Structure:If a single link fails, only a segment of the network is affected, not the whole system.

Easier Troubleshooting:The hierarchical layout allows for easier identification and isolation of faulty nodes.

Compared to Bus Topology:In a bus topology, a single cable failure can disrupt the entire network.

Incorrect Options:

A. Easier network expansion:True, but not primarily a security advantage.

B. Better performance:Depends on network design, not a security aspect.

D. Less susceptible to eavesdropping:Tree topology itself does not inherently reduce eavesdropping risks.

Exact Extract from CCOA Official Review Manual, 1st Edition:

Refer to Chapter 5, Section "Network Topologies," Subsection "Tree Topology Benefits" - The primary security advantage is increased fault tolerance and stability.