IAPP CIPP-E Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

SCENARIO

Please use the following to answer the next question:

Financially, it has been a very good year at ARRA Hotels: Their 21 hotels, located in

Greece (5), Italy (15) and Spain (1), have registered their most profitable results

ever. To celebrate this achievement, ARRA Hotels' Human Resources office, based

in ARRA's main Italian establishment, has organized a team event for its 420

employees and their families at its hotel in Spain.

Upon arrival at the hotel, each employee and family member is given an electronic

wristband at the reception desk. The wristband serves a number of functions:

. Allows access to the "party zone" of the hotel, and emits a buzz if the user

approaches any unauthorized areas

. Allows up to three free drinks for each person of legal age, and emits a

buzz once this limit has been reached

. Grants a unique ID number for participating in the games and contests that

have been planned.

Along with the wristband, each guest receives a QR code that leads to the online

privacy notice describing the use of the wristband. The page also contains an

unchecked consent checkbox. In the case of employee family members under the

age of 16, consent must be given by a parent.

Among the various activities planned for the event, ARRA Hotels' HR office has

autonomously set up a photocall area, separate from the main event venue, where

employees can come and have their pictures taken in traditional carnival costume.

The photos will be posted on ARRA Hotels' main website for general marketing

purposes.

On the night of the event, an employee from one of ARRA's Greek hotels is

displeased with the results of the photos in which he appears. He intends to file a

complaint with the relevant supervisory authority in regard to the following:

. The lack of any privacy notice in the separate photocall area

The unlawful cross-border processing of his personal data

. The unacceptable aesthetic outcome of his photos

Why would consent NOT be considered an adequate legal basis for accessing the

party zone?

In which of the following cases, cited as an example by a WP29 guidance, would conducting a single data protection impact assessment to address multiple processing operations be allowed?

SCENARIO

Please use the following to answer the next question:

Due to rapidly expanding workforce, Company A has decided to outsource its payroll function to Company B. Company B is an established payroll service provider with a sizable client base and a solid reputation in the industry.

Company B’s payroll solution for Company A relies on the collection of time and attendance data obtained via a biometric entry system installed in each of Company A’s factories. Company B won’t hold any biometric data itself, but the related data will be uploaded to Company B’s UK servers and used to provide the payroll service. Company B’s live systems will contain the following information for each of Company A’s employees:

Name

Address

Date of Birth

Payroll number

National Insurance number

Sick pay entitlement

Maternity/paternity pay entitlement

Holiday entitlement

Pension and benefits contributions

Trade union contributions

Jenny is the compliance officer at Company A. She first considers whether Company A needs to carry out a data protection impact assessment in relation to the new time and attendance system, but isn’t sure whether or not this is required.

Jenny does know, however, that under the GDPR there must be a formal written agreement requiring Company B to use the time and attendance data only for the purpose of providing the payroll service, and to apply appropriate technical and organizational security measures for safeguarding the data. Jenny suggests that Company B obtain advice from its data protection officer. The company doesn’t have a DPO but agrees, in the interest of finalizing the contract, to sign up for the provisions in full. Company A enters into the contract.

Weeks later, while still under contract with Company A, Company B embarks upon a separate project meant to enhance the functionality of its payroll service, and engages Company C to help. Company C agrees to extract all personal data from Company B’s live systems in order to create a new database for Company B.

This database will be stored in a test environment hosted on Company C’s U.S. server. The two companies agree not to include any data processing provisions in their services agreement, as data is only being used for IT testing purposes.

Unfortunately, Company C’s U.S. server is only protected by an outdated IT security system, and suffers a cyber security incident soon after Company C begins work on the project. As a result, data relating to Company A’s employees is visible to anyone visiting Company C’s website. Company A is unaware of this until Jenny receives a letter from the supervisory authority in connection with the investigation that ensues. As soon as Jenny is made aware of the breach, she notifies all affected employees.

The GDPR requires sufficient guarantees of a company’s ability to implement adequate technical and organizational measures. What would be the most realistic way that Company B could have fulfilled this requirement?