FINRA SIE Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

A stock’s price is generally adjusted downward by the amount of the declared cash dividend on the ex-dividend date, so B is correct. The ex-dividend date is the first day the stock trades without the right to receive the upcoming dividend. Investors who purchase on or after the ex-dividend date are not entitled to that declared dividend; the seller retains the right to receive it. Because new buyers are no longer receiving that cash distribution, the market typically reflects this by reducing the stock’s price by approximately the dividend amount (all else equal). This is a standard SIE-tested dividend timing concept.

The record date (choice C) is the date on which the company reviews its shareholder records to determine who is entitled to receive the dividend. It is a corporate bookkeeping cutoff and is not the date the market typically adjusts the price. The payment date (choice D) is when the company actually pays the dividend to shareholders of record; again, this is not when the stock generally drops by the dividend amount. Choice A is incorrect because “redemption date” applies to instruments like bonds, CDs, or redeemable fund shares—not common stock dividends.

This topic sits under corporate actions and dividend mechanics, and the SIE expects you to connect the sequence: declaration date (announced), ex-dividend date (price adjustment / eligibility cutoff for buyers), record date (company records), and payable/payment date (cash distributed). Understanding the ex-dividend date is crucial for customer communication, trade timing, and explaining why price may appear to “drop” even without negative news.

Purchasing a put option allows the customer to sell the stock at a predetermined price (the strike price) if the share price declines. This strategy protects against downside risk while maintaining upside potential.

C is correct because a put acts as insurance, locking in a minimum sale price.

A is incorrect because selling a put exposes the investor to additional risk if the stock declines.

B is incorrect because selling a call generates income but does not protect against downside risk.

D is incorrect because purchasing a call is a bullish strategy unrelated to protecting existing positions.

The correct answer is A (No filing required) based on the facts provided. A Currency Transaction Report (CTR) is generally triggered by currency transactions (cash) over the applicable threshold within a single business day. In this scenario, the customer deposited a cashier’s check and a money order, which are monetary instruments, not “currency” (cash). Therefore, even though the combined amount is $10,500, the deposits described are not cash deposits, so this does not automatically require a CTR.

A Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) is required when activity is suspicious and meets reporting criteria—such as transactions that appear designed to evade reporting requirements, have no apparent lawful purpose, involve potential money laundering, or otherwise raise red flags. Here, the amounts and instruments alone—$8,000 cashier’s check and $2,500 money order deposited the same day—do not necessarily indicate suspicious activity. Without additional facts (e.g., patterns of structuring, inconsistent customer profile, unusual source of funds, evasive behavior, or other AML red flags), the firm is not required to file a SAR solely on this activity.

Form W-9 is used to request a taxpayer identification number and certification for certain tax-reporting purposes, but it is not a standard “required filing” triggered by these deposits as described.

The SIE tests the ability to distinguish between currency-based reporting (CTR) and suspicion-based reporting (SAR), and to recognize that not every large or same-day deposit is automatically reportable without meeting the specific rule trigger.