Free and Premium Adobe AD0-E137 Dumps Questions Answers

Workflow launchers in AEM are designed to monitor changes in specific repository paths such as /content, /content/dam, and /conf. However, changes under certain system-level paths, including /var, do not trigger workflows. This restriction is intentional, as /var is used for system-generated and internal data such as workflow instances, audit logs, and temporary nodes. Triggering workflows on changes under /var could result in recursive or unintended behavior. Option A is unrelated because Workflow Process Legacy Mode refers to backwards compatibility. Option B is incorrect, as AEM does allow system nodes under /var, but they are not workflow-launcher enabled. Adobe documentation makes clear that workflow launchers must be configured under supported content paths for them to execute correctly.

Modern AEM projects often include front-end build processes for handling CSS, JavaScript, and component-specific assets. Webpack is the recommended tool for managing dependencies, bundling code, minification, transpilation (e.g., ES6+ to ES5), and optimizing assets. It integrates with the AEM Maven build process and supports workflows like Single Page Applications (SPA) and client libraries. Option B, Apache Sling, is the underlying web framework for AEM, not a front-end tool. Option C, Maven, manages project builds and back-end dependencies but not front-end asset pipelines. Option D, the AEM Sites Console, is for authoring and managing pages, not development builds. Adobe documentation for SPA Editor and modern AEM projects consistently demonstrates Webpack as the standard tool for front-end optimization.

Explanation (Adobe Docs Reference):

Assets in AEM are stored as dam:Asset nodes, not nt:base or cq:image.

Metadata like cq:lastModified is stored under jcr:content/metadata.

Therefore, the correct query must use [dam:Asset] with the proper metadata path.

Options A and C are invalid because they use wrong node types or incorrect property paths.

Adobe Documentation:

“Assets are represented as dam:Asset nodes. Metadata such as lastModified is stored under jcr:content/metadata and can be queried using JCR-SQL2.”

— AEM Assets – Querying Assets

The Oak query engine, which underpins AEM’s repository search and indexing capabilities, supports multiple query syntaxes. However, Adobe recommends using XPath or JCR-SQL2, with XPath being the most widely used. JCR-SQL (option A) is deprecated and should not be used in modern AEM implementations. Plain SQL (option B) is not supported as queries must operate within the JCR structure. Option C, XPath, integrates tightly with Oak’s indexing system and provides efficient query execution. Adobe documentation states explicitly that developers should use XPath or JCR-SQL2 for queries, as both are optimized for Oak’s indexing and repository structure. Since the question provides XPath as an option but not JCR-SQL2, XPath is the correct answer.

In AEM, multi-site management allows centralized content updates to be pushed across different localized or departmental sites. The “Partial” option on the rollout configuration ensures that only specific components or regions designated for shared updates are synchronized, while leaving local content intact. This fits the described requirement where a portion of each school’s homepage must receive university updates without affecting school-specific content. Option A, Experience Fragments, could be used but are better suited for shared fragments of design/content, not controlled rollout scenarios. Option C requires manual inheritance restoration per page, which is inefficient. Option D, implementing custom rollout logic, is not needed when the built-in “Partial Rollout” option fulfills the requirement. Adobe emphasizes using partial rollout in multi-site configurations to balance central control with localized autonomy.

Explanation (Adobe Docs Reference):

The SAML Authentication Handler in AEM requires the following key properties:

path: Defines the content path where this handler applies (here /content/siteB).

idpUrl: The Identity Provider’s SAML endpoint (here

Other properties like serviceProviderEntityId and assertionConsumerServiceURL are also required in a real-world setup but the correct basic mapping in this scenario is option B.

Adobe Documentation:

“The SAML authentication handler is configured by setting path to the protected resource root and idpUrl to the Identity Provider endpoint.”

— Adobe AEM 6.5 – SAML Authentication Handler

When workflows require complex conditional logic or integration with external systems, Adobe recommends writing custom workflow process steps in Java. By implementing the WorkflowProcess interface, developers can evaluate metadata dynamically and invoke APIs or services as needed. Option A is too limited because out-of-the-box workflow steps support simple operations but cannot manage advanced branching or integrations. Option C is not suitable because content fragments are intended for structured content authoring, not for managing asset workflows. Adobe’s documentation states that workflows should remain modular, with custom steps encapsulating business-specific logic, while the Workflow Model defines the process flow. This ensures extensibility, testability, and clean separation between workflow orchestration and implementation logic.

Explanation (Adobe Docs Reference):

When configuring SAML SSO with AEM, the dispatcher must allow POST requests to the saml_login endpoint. If blocked, AEM redirects endlessly back to the IDP. This is done by allowing the POST request in filters.any.

Adobe Documentation:

“For SAML authentication to work with AEM behind a Dispatcher, you must configure the dispatcher filter to allow POST requests to /saml_login. Otherwise, authentication attempts will loop infinitely.”

— AEM Dispatcher and SAML Authentication Configuration

In AEM, fine-grained access control is managed using JCR Access Control Entries (ACEs). To grant access only to a specific node but exclude all child nodes, the correct approach is to set the rep:glob = "" property. This ensures that permissions apply strictly to the node itself and not recursively. Option B, rep:globs = "**", would apply access recursively to all descendants. Option C, rep:glob = "child", is invalid and does not represent a valid configuration. Adobe recommends precise use of rep:glob patterns to restrict user access according to security requirements, ensuring least-privilege principles.

To optimize queries against DAM assets with custom properties, developers must extend the existing damAssetLucene index. The correct method is to add the custom property under:

oak:index/damAssetLucene/indexRules/dam:Asset/properties. This ensures that the property is indexed for all assets and avoids traversal queries. Option B refers to a non-existent lucene index path, and Option C incorrectly suggests adding a property value (Hello) instead of the property name. Adobe’s indexing guidelines specify that extending existing Lucene indexes such as damAssetLucene is the standard approach for asset-related queries. This ensures queries remain efficient, scalable, and compatible across environments.

Explanation (Adobe Docs Reference):

The correct OSGi Declarative Services (DS) implementation in AEM:

Must use implements (not extends).

Must register the service interface (SimpleService.class).

Should return an implementation for getMessage().

Option D is the correct implementation.

Options A, B, C are wrong because:

A incorrectly uses extends.

B and C register the wrong service type (MySimpleService).

Adobe Documentation:

“An OSGi service implementation must implement its interface and be annotated with @Component(service=Interface.class) to register the service.”

— OSGi Services in AEM

Explanation (Adobe Docs Reference):

When querying with QueryBuilder API:

type=cq:Page ensures only AEM pages are selected.

property=jcr:content/cq:template filters by the template path.

property.value=/conf/geometrixx/templates/homepage ensures only pages created with the homepage template are returned.

p.hits=selective restricts returned properties.

p.properties=jcr:title ensures only the jcr:title is returned.

Options B, C, and D are invalid due to wrong property paths (jcr:title/cq:template, cq:template, or jcr:content/template) or typos (jrc:title).

Adobe Documentation:

“The property parameter can be used to restrict results based on template usage. Use jcr:content/cq:template to filter by template and p.properties with p.hits=selective to return specific fields.”

— AEM QueryBuilder API Guide

In Dispatcher configuration, request filtering is handled through the filters.any file. To deny access to specific content types or formats (like .json and .xml) for certain paths, the configuration must explicitly match both the extension and the path using correct syntax. The valid approach uses:

/0001 { /type "deny" /extension "(xml|json)" /path "(/path2|/path3)/*" }

Options A and B contain syntax errors. Option A incorrectly uses JSON/* instead of paths, and Option B mixes array-style brackets instead of regex or path expressions. Option C follows the correct pattern of specifying deny rules with /extension and /path. Adobe recommends always explicitly denying unwanted selectors or extensions to prevent exposure of sensitive content through JSON or XML requests.

Explanation (Adobe Docs Reference):

AEM provides Generic Analytics Snippet functionality to allow marketing/analytics teams to manage third-party tracking scripts directly through the AEM UI, without needing a development release cycle. This enables non-developers to add or update scripts (e.g., analytics tags, marketing pixels) safely.

Option A is incorrect: Hardcoding the script in HTL means dev releases are required for every change.

Option B is incorrect: Page policies control design configurations and allowed components, not scripts.

Option C is correct: Generic Analytics Snippet is designed for this scenario.

Adobe Documentation:

“AEM provides a generic analytics snippet component that allows administrators to add and manage third-party tracking codes outside of the development cycle.”

— AEM Sites – Generic Analytics Snippet

The RepoInit feature is the correct solution. RepoInit scripts allow developers to define repository initialization instructions in a declarative manner. With RepoInit, engineers can register namespaces, create folders, define service users, configure access control lists (ACLs), and create groups — all in one script. Option A, Ensure Authorizable, is limited to ensuring users or groups exist but does not handle namespaces or folder creation. Option C, OnDeploy Scripts, is not recommended for these tasks, as RepoInit is the standard, supported, and maintainable approach for repository initialization in AEM. Adobe documentation highlights RepoInit as the best practice for managing repository initialization in both AEM 6.5 and AEM as a Cloud Service.